GENDER, INSTITUTION TYPE AND ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE AS DETERMINANTS OF COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN OSUN STATE TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN NIGERIA

{"title":"GENDER, INSTITUTION TYPE AND ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE AS DETERMINANTS OF COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN OSUN STATE TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN NIGERIA","authors":"","doi":"10.58908/tmuj.v7i1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rate among undergraduate students in Nigeria. It also investigated differences in COVID-19 hesitancy of undergraduates based on gender, institution type, and academic discipline. A descriptive survey method was employed for the study. The study population comprised undergraduate students in tertiary institutions in Osun State. Three tertiary institutions were selected using a stratified sampling technique; three campuses were selected from a public university which included health and non-health-related courses. In addition, a public polytechnic and a private university were also selected from a total of five campuses. A convenient sampling technique was used to select 500 respondents. The Covid-19 Hesitancy Questionnaire (CHQ) instrument with reliability coefficients of 0.716, 0.872, and 0.834 using Split-half, Cronbach Alpha, and Spearman-Brown, respectively. The study revealed a high rate (81.8%) of COVID-19 hesitancy among Osun State tertiary institutions undergraduate students. Statistically, there was no significant difference in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy of students based on gender and institution type [t (2,498) =0.65; P > 0.05] and [t (2,498) =0.13; P > 0.05]; whereas, a significant difference was found in the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy of students based on academic discipline [t (2,498) =0.00; P < 0.05]. It is suggested that government should convey trusted information on the COVID-19 vaccine through the use of different media as well as improving vaccination services. There should be proactive and effective initiatives to fight misinformation regarding the COVID-19 vaccine.","PeriodicalId":376426,"journal":{"name":"The Millennium University Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Millennium University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58908/tmuj.v7i1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rate among undergraduate students in Nigeria. It also investigated differences in COVID-19 hesitancy of undergraduates based on gender, institution type, and academic discipline. A descriptive survey method was employed for the study. The study population comprised undergraduate students in tertiary institutions in Osun State. Three tertiary institutions were selected using a stratified sampling technique; three campuses were selected from a public university which included health and non-health-related courses. In addition, a public polytechnic and a private university were also selected from a total of five campuses. A convenient sampling technique was used to select 500 respondents. The Covid-19 Hesitancy Questionnaire (CHQ) instrument with reliability coefficients of 0.716, 0.872, and 0.834 using Split-half, Cronbach Alpha, and Spearman-Brown, respectively. The study revealed a high rate (81.8%) of COVID-19 hesitancy among Osun State tertiary institutions undergraduate students. Statistically, there was no significant difference in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy of students based on gender and institution type [t (2,498) =0.65; P > 0.05] and [t (2,498) =0.13; P > 0.05]; whereas, a significant difference was found in the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy of students based on academic discipline [t (2,498) =0.00; P < 0.05]. It is suggested that government should convey trusted information on the COVID-19 vaccine through the use of different media as well as improving vaccination services. There should be proactive and effective initiatives to fight misinformation regarding the COVID-19 vaccine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别、院校类型和学科是尼日利亚osun州立高等院校本科生COVID-19疫苗犹豫的决定因素
本研究调查了尼日利亚大学生的COVID-19疫苗犹豫率。研究还调查了不同性别、院校类型和学科的大学生对新冠肺炎的犹豫度差异。本研究采用描述性调查方法。研究对象包括奥松州大专院校的本科生。采用分层抽样技术,选取三所高等院校;从一所公立大学中选择了三个校区,其中包括卫生和非卫生课程。此外,一所公立理工学院和一所私立大学也从总共五个校区中选出。采用方便的抽样技术,选取了500名受访者。采用Split-half法、Cronbach Alpha法和Spearman-Brown法,新冠肺炎犹豫问卷(CHQ)量表的信度系数分别为0.716、0.872和0.834。该研究显示,奥松州立大学本科院校学生对COVID-19的犹豫率很高(81.8%)。统计上,不同性别和院校类型的学生COVID-19疫苗犹豫无显著差异[t (2,498) =0.65;P > 0.05], [t (2,498) =0.13;P > 0.05];不同学科学生对新冠肺炎疫苗的犹豫态度差异有统计学意义[t (2,498) =0.00];P < 0.05]。建议政府在加强疫苗接种服务的同时,通过不同媒体传播可信的新冠肺炎疫苗信息。应采取积极有效的行动,打击有关COVID-19疫苗的错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INTERCONNECTION RESULTANT EFFECT OF TWO INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES, MENTAL ABILITY AND GENDER, ON LEARNERS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN ABSTRACT CONCEPTS IN BIOLOGY PERCEIVED SELF-EFFICACY, PEER GROUP PRESSURE, AND FAMILY CONNECTEDNESS AS PSYCHOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF SEXUAL RISK BEHAVIOURS EFFECT OF COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL INTERVENTION ON AGGRESSION AND VIOLENCE OF PUPILS WITH PROBLEM BEHAVIOURS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL IN ABUJA SELF-ESTEEM AND ATTACHMENT STYLE AS PREDICTOR OF MARITAL HARMONY AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN KWARA STATE NIGERIA GENDER, INSTITUTION TYPE AND ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE AS DETERMINANTS OF COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN OSUN STATE TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN NIGERIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1