Impact of Board Structure on Insolvency and Credit Risk: Moderating role of Domestic and Transnational Financial Liberalization in Asian Banking Sector

R. Bibi, Zaheer Abbas, Waqas Ahmad, T. Awan
{"title":"Impact of Board Structure on Insolvency and Credit Risk: Moderating role of Domestic and Transnational Financial Liberalization in Asian Banking Sector","authors":"R. Bibi, Zaheer Abbas, Waqas Ahmad, T. Awan","doi":"10.51239/nrjss.v0i0.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose-The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of board structure on risk-taking. It also takes financial liberalization as a moderator between board structure and risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach- Data of variables of interest has been obtained from the annual reports of banks and statistical reports published by Central Bank of concerned countries. Ten banks have been selected from every ten Asian countries during the period 2005 to 2015. GMM estimator is used for data analysis. Findings- Findings of the study reveal that both board size and board independence decrease risk-taking practices in sample economies. Further, the presence of powerful CEOs on board structure increases risk-taking. The most robust result has been proved for board independence as compared with board size and CEO/chairman duality. Financial liberalization moderates the relationship between board structure and risk-taking. Originality/value- Most of the previously published studies in this area use only one type of financial liberalization at one time. This study includes both types of financial liberalization: domestic financial liberalization and transnational financial liberalization, at one time. Laeven financial liberalization index has been created for concerned economies.","PeriodicalId":286621,"journal":{"name":"NICE Research Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NICE Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51239/nrjss.v0i0.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose-The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of board structure on risk-taking. It also takes financial liberalization as a moderator between board structure and risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach- Data of variables of interest has been obtained from the annual reports of banks and statistical reports published by Central Bank of concerned countries. Ten banks have been selected from every ten Asian countries during the period 2005 to 2015. GMM estimator is used for data analysis. Findings- Findings of the study reveal that both board size and board independence decrease risk-taking practices in sample economies. Further, the presence of powerful CEOs on board structure increases risk-taking. The most robust result has been proved for board independence as compared with board size and CEO/chairman duality. Financial liberalization moderates the relationship between board structure and risk-taking. Originality/value- Most of the previously published studies in this area use only one type of financial liberalization at one time. This study includes both types of financial liberalization: domestic financial liberalization and transnational financial liberalization, at one time. Laeven financial liberalization index has been created for concerned economies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会结构对资不抵债和信用风险的影响:亚洲银行业国内和跨国金融自由化的调节作用
目的:本研究的目的是分析董事会结构对风险承担的影响。它还将金融自由化作为董事会结构与风险承担之间的调节因素。设计/方法/方法-有关变量的数据来自银行的年度报告和有关国家中央银行发表的统计报告。2005年至2015年,每10个亚洲国家选出10家银行。使用GMM估计器进行数据分析。研究结果-研究结果表明,在样本经济体中,董事会规模和董事会独立性都降低了风险承担行为。此外,董事会结构中强势ceo的存在增加了风险。与董事会规模和CEO/董事长二元性相比,董事会独立性得到了最有力的证明。金融自由化调节了董事会结构与风险承担之间的关系。原创性/价值——在这一领域以前发表的大多数研究一次只使用一种类型的金融自由化。本研究同时包括两种类型的金融自由化:国内金融自由化和跨国金融自由化。针对相关经济体制定了一系列金融自由化指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dependence Structure between Green Bond Market and Asian Stock Markets: Evidence from India, China and Pakistan Dynamics of Technical Barriers to Trade on Baltic States’ Export to the World Accounting for Murabahah – Reviewing the Need for Exclusive Accounting Standards Impact of Workplace Status on Employee Expediency and Intention to Sabotage: Mediating Role of Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior Psychological Indicator(s) in Stock Activities considering SDGs: The Wealth Maximization Criteria of Investors and Growth of Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1