Varieties of Islamic Social Science

Alireza Doostdar
{"title":"Varieties of Islamic Social Science","authors":"Alireza Doostdar","doi":"10.1086/699019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ocial sciences like anthropology and sociology have lived several different but overlapping lives in Iran. As Europeanimported discourses about society and history, they informed competing modernist political trends from the nineteenth century onward. As academic fields instituted after the 1950s, they aided the Pahlavi regime’s top-down modernization program and continue to act as applied, problem-solving disciplines to this day. As forms of revolutionary praxis in the 1970s, they galvanized militant students to overthrow the monarchic regime and build a new society from the bottom. In the decades since the 1979 Revolution, they have branched off in still more directions: in epistemological debates on science and civilization, and in critiques of the sacralization of power and bureaucratization of religion in the Islamic Republic. These diverse “lives” of the social sciences are intertwined in complex ways with Islam, where the latter must also be understood in a multiplicity of forms: on the one hand, Islam as a tradition comprising many disciplines of inquiry ( jurisprudence, theology, mysticism, ethics, Qurʾanic exegesis, hadith scholarship, and so on), and on the other","PeriodicalId":187662,"journal":{"name":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/699019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ocial sciences like anthropology and sociology have lived several different but overlapping lives in Iran. As Europeanimported discourses about society and history, they informed competing modernist political trends from the nineteenth century onward. As academic fields instituted after the 1950s, they aided the Pahlavi regime’s top-down modernization program and continue to act as applied, problem-solving disciplines to this day. As forms of revolutionary praxis in the 1970s, they galvanized militant students to overthrow the monarchic regime and build a new society from the bottom. In the decades since the 1979 Revolution, they have branched off in still more directions: in epistemological debates on science and civilization, and in critiques of the sacralization of power and bureaucratization of religion in the Islamic Republic. These diverse “lives” of the social sciences are intertwined in complex ways with Islam, where the latter must also be understood in a multiplicity of forms: on the one hand, Islam as a tradition comprising many disciplines of inquiry ( jurisprudence, theology, mysticism, ethics, Qurʾanic exegesis, hadith scholarship, and so on), and on the other
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰社会科学的多样性
像人类学和社会学这样的社会科学在伊朗经历了几种不同但又重叠的生活。随着欧洲引入有关社会和历史的论述,它们为19世纪以来相互竞争的现代主义政治趋势提供了信息。作为20世纪50年代以后建立的学术领域,它们帮助巴列维政权自上而下的现代化计划,并继续作为应用的、解决问题的学科。作为20世纪70年代革命实践的形式,它们激发了激进的学生推翻君主政权,从底层建立一个新社会。自1979年革命以来的几十年里,他们在更多的方向上展开了分支:在关于科学和文明的认识论辩论中,在对伊斯兰共和国权力神圣化和宗教官僚化的批评中。社会科学的这些不同的“生命”以复杂的方式与伊斯兰教交织在一起,后者也必须以多种形式来理解:一方面,伊斯兰教作为一个传统,包括许多探究学科(法学、神学、神秘主义、伦理学、古兰经训诂学、圣训学术等),另一方面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcreation and Postcolonial Knowledge Chomsky versus Foucault, and the Problem of Knowledge in Translation When Dragons Show Themselves: Research, Constructing Knowledge, and the Practice of Translation A Critique of Provincial Reason: Situated Cosmopolitanisms and the Infrastructures of Theoretical Translation Translation and the Archive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1