Further analysis on blocking time bounds for partitioned fixed priority multiprocessor scheduling

Zhongqi Ma, Ryo Kurachi, Gang Zeng, H. Takada
{"title":"Further analysis on blocking time bounds for partitioned fixed priority multiprocessor scheduling","authors":"Zhongqi Ma, Ryo Kurachi, Gang Zeng, H. Takada","doi":"10.1109/SIES.2016.7509435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partitioned fixed priority scheduling is one of the most comprehensively chosen predictable scheduling in practice. The FMLP+ developed in recent years is a better protocol, which ensures asymptotically optimal O(n) maximum priority-inversion blocking. The constraints under several protocols besides the FMLP+ can be exploited to gain the bound on maximum blocking time. However, the blocking time bounds may be pessimistic under the FMLP+ on the ground that shared resources local to a processor do not incur priority-inversion blocking in some cases. It is possible that a schedulable task set is judged as unschedulable because of the pessimistic values. Based on our analysis, a few constraints was added to compute the maximum blocking time of each task, and then its worst-case response time. The results of our experiments show less pessimism than the existing ones. Meanwhile, we also demonstrate the usefulness of the conclusion that global resource sharing should be transformed into local one where possible.","PeriodicalId":185636,"journal":{"name":"2016 11th IEEE Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 11th IEEE Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIES.2016.7509435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Partitioned fixed priority scheduling is one of the most comprehensively chosen predictable scheduling in practice. The FMLP+ developed in recent years is a better protocol, which ensures asymptotically optimal O(n) maximum priority-inversion blocking. The constraints under several protocols besides the FMLP+ can be exploited to gain the bound on maximum blocking time. However, the blocking time bounds may be pessimistic under the FMLP+ on the ground that shared resources local to a processor do not incur priority-inversion blocking in some cases. It is possible that a schedulable task set is judged as unschedulable because of the pessimistic values. Based on our analysis, a few constraints was added to compute the maximum blocking time of each task, and then its worst-case response time. The results of our experiments show less pessimism than the existing ones. Meanwhile, we also demonstrate the usefulness of the conclusion that global resource sharing should be transformed into local one where possible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分区固定优先级多处理机调度阻塞时限的进一步分析
分区固定优先级调度是实践中选择最全面的可预测调度方法之一。近年来发展起来的FMLP+是一种较好的协议,它能保证渐进最优的O(n)最大优先级反转阻塞。除了FMLP+协议外,还可以利用其他协议的约束来获得最大阻塞时间的界。然而,在FMLP+下,阻塞时限可能是悲观的,因为处理器本地共享资源在某些情况下不会导致优先级反转阻塞。由于悲观值,可调度任务集可能被判断为不可调度。在分析的基础上,增加了一些约束条件来计算每个任务的最大阻塞时间,然后计算其最坏情况响应时间。我们的实验结果比现有的结果更悲观。同时,我们也证明了全球资源共享应尽可能转变为局部资源共享的结论的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communication aware multiprocessor binding for shared memory systems Efficient algorithms for memory management in embedded vision systems Static probabilistic timing analysis in presence of faults Conformance checking for programmable logic controller programs and specifications Minimizing stack usage for AUTOSAR/OSEK's restricted fixed-priority preemption threshold support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1