Comparison between Multiple Linear Regression Models Vs Supervised Artificial Neural Networks in the Prediction of Ecuadorian Ser Bachiller 2018-2019 Grades

Sandra Viviana Guamán Luna, Héctor Salomón Mullo Guaminga, Jessica Alexandra Marcatoma Tixi
{"title":"Comparison between Multiple Linear Regression Models Vs Supervised Artificial Neural Networks in the Prediction of Ecuadorian Ser Bachiller 2018-2019 Grades","authors":"Sandra Viviana Guamán Luna, Héctor Salomón Mullo Guaminga, Jessica Alexandra Marcatoma Tixi","doi":"10.31876/ie.v7i2.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the comparison between Multiple Linear Regression models vs supervised Artificial Neural Networks in the prediction of academic performance in the form of grades of the Ser-Bachiller evaluation of Ecuador, period 2018-2019. This by testing assumptions and calculating adequacy measures to identify the best prediction method. To meet the objective, information from the results of the Ser-Bachiller tests of Ecuador in the 2018-2019 cycle whose database is located on the official website of the National Institute of Educational Evaluation was used. There were 514852 students evaluated from all over the country. With this information we compared models that predict the scores in the domains of Mathematics, Linguistics, Science and Social Sciences, through factors associated with academic performance of Institutional, Pedagogical, Psychosocial and sociodemographic type.","PeriodicalId":337157,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de la Educación","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de la Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31876/ie.v7i2.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the comparison between Multiple Linear Regression models vs supervised Artificial Neural Networks in the prediction of academic performance in the form of grades of the Ser-Bachiller evaluation of Ecuador, period 2018-2019. This by testing assumptions and calculating adequacy measures to identify the best prediction method. To meet the objective, information from the results of the Ser-Bachiller tests of Ecuador in the 2018-2019 cycle whose database is located on the official website of the National Institute of Educational Evaluation was used. There were 514852 students evaluated from all over the country. With this information we compared models that predict the scores in the domains of Mathematics, Linguistics, Science and Social Sciences, through factors associated with academic performance of Institutional, Pedagogical, Psychosocial and sociodemographic type.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元线性回归模型与监督人工神经网络在厄瓜多尔Ser Bachiller 2018-2019成绩预测中的比较
本文比较了多元线性回归模型与监督人工神经网络在预测厄瓜多尔2018-2019年Ser-Bachiller评价成绩形式的学习成绩方面的比较。这是通过检验假设和计算充分性来确定最佳预测方法。为了实现这一目标,我们使用了厄瓜多尔2018-2019年Ser-Bachiller测试结果的信息,该测试的数据库位于国家教育评估研究所的官方网站上。共有来自全国各地的514852名学生接受了评估。有了这些信息,我们比较了预测数学、语言学、科学和社会科学领域分数的模型,通过与制度、教学、社会心理和社会人口类型的学术表现相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A grade como instrumento de análise curricular na elaboração de provas padronizadas Gamification as an educational strategy in the learning of arithmetic for elementary school students Strengthening school coexistence through ancestral knowledge Identification of the satisfaction of Tecnológico Espíritu Santo students with the different institutional processes and services Use of Artificial Intelligence in High School Mathematics Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1