Radical Homemaking in Contemporary American Environmental Fiction

Kris Jacobson
{"title":"Radical Homemaking in Contemporary American Environmental Fiction","authors":"Kris Jacobson","doi":"10.16995/C21.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ursula K. Heise in ‘Ecocriticism and the Transnational Turn in American Studies’ critiques ‘the portrayal of multicultural and sometimes transnational nuclear families as the narrative solution to environmental and political problems’ (Heise, 2008: 383). This essay places Heise’s critique of the ‘ecological family romance’ in conversation with three other ecological domestic fictions: T. C. Boyle’s A Friend of the Earth (2000), Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom (2010), and Barbara Kingsolver’s Flight Behavior (2012). Heise’s critique and Shannon Hayes’ Radical Homemakers (2010) frame my close readings of the novels’ interconnected themes of radical homemaking, transnationalism, and environmentalism. My reading of the novels highlights their shared use of marginalized, racially-other characters to develop their entwined romantic and environmental plots (Lalitha in Freedom, several minor characters in A Friend of the Earth, and Ovid in Flight Behavior) and their use of sentimental deaths, especially of key female characters (Lalitha in Freedom, Sierra in A Friend of the Earth, and Dellarobia’s uncertain fate in Flight Behavior). By adopting the sentimental, domestic romance plot for ecological aims, the three novels highlight how environmental aims get stymied when cultural and ecological diversity are relegated to the margins. They also suggest that more is gained than lost through their use of ecological allegory. While the fictions do not offer solutions, they do push their readers to confront the Anthropocene’s ecological realities and their radical domestic-environmental politics.","PeriodicalId":272809,"journal":{"name":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/C21.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Ursula K. Heise in ‘Ecocriticism and the Transnational Turn in American Studies’ critiques ‘the portrayal of multicultural and sometimes transnational nuclear families as the narrative solution to environmental and political problems’ (Heise, 2008: 383). This essay places Heise’s critique of the ‘ecological family romance’ in conversation with three other ecological domestic fictions: T. C. Boyle’s A Friend of the Earth (2000), Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom (2010), and Barbara Kingsolver’s Flight Behavior (2012). Heise’s critique and Shannon Hayes’ Radical Homemakers (2010) frame my close readings of the novels’ interconnected themes of radical homemaking, transnationalism, and environmentalism. My reading of the novels highlights their shared use of marginalized, racially-other characters to develop their entwined romantic and environmental plots (Lalitha in Freedom, several minor characters in A Friend of the Earth, and Ovid in Flight Behavior) and their use of sentimental deaths, especially of key female characters (Lalitha in Freedom, Sierra in A Friend of the Earth, and Dellarobia’s uncertain fate in Flight Behavior). By adopting the sentimental, domestic romance plot for ecological aims, the three novels highlight how environmental aims get stymied when cultural and ecological diversity are relegated to the margins. They also suggest that more is gained than lost through their use of ecological allegory. While the fictions do not offer solutions, they do push their readers to confront the Anthropocene’s ecological realities and their radical domestic-environmental politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代美国环境小说中的激进家庭主义
厄休拉·k·海泽在《美国研究中的生态批评和跨国转向》中批评“将多元文化、有时甚至是跨国核心家庭的描述作为环境和政治问题的叙事解决方案”(海泽,2008:383)。这篇文章将海斯对“生态家庭浪漫”的批评与另外三部生态家庭小说进行了对话:t·c·博伊尔的《地球之友》(2000),乔纳森·弗兰岑的《自由》(2010)和芭芭拉·金索沃的《飞行行为》(2012)。海斯的批评和香农·海耶斯的《激进的家庭主妇》(2010)构成了我对这两部小说相互关联的主题——激进的家庭主妇、跨国主义和环境主义——的仔细阅读。我对这些小说的阅读突出了他们共同使用边缘化的,种族其他的角色来发展他们交织在一起的浪漫和环境情节(《自由》中的拉莉莎,《地球之友》中的几个次要人物,以及《飞行行为》中的奥维德)和他们对情感死亡的使用,特别是对关键女性角色的使用(《自由》中的拉莉莎,《地球之友》中的塞拉,以及《飞行行为》中德拉罗比亚不确定的命运)。这三部小说采用了伤感的家庭浪漫情节来实现生态目标,突显了文化和生态多样性被边缘化时,环境目标是如何受到阻碍的。他们还认为,通过使用生态寓言,得到的比失去的多。虽然这些小说没有提供解决方案,但它们确实促使读者面对人类世的生态现实和激进的国内环境政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Listen Up: Collective Armenian Genocide Postmemory in Micheline Aharonian Marcom’s Three Apples Fell from Heaven Book Review of Bill Ashcroft's Utopianism in Postcolonial Literatures Review: Megen de Bruin-Molé, Gothic Remixed: Monster Mashups and Frankenfictions in 21st Century Literature. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020 Review of The Comic Turn in Contemporary English Fiction, by Huw Marsh #MeToo and the Northern Ireland Troubles: Anna Burns' Milkman
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1