Hunger, Accommodation, and Violence in Colonial America

Rachel B. Herrmann
{"title":"Hunger, Accommodation, and Violence in Colonial America","authors":"Rachel B. Herrmann","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how, between the 1500s and 1700s, two varying approaches toward dealing with food and hunger allowed inconsistent ideas about hunger to form, which in turn influenced how Natives and non-Natives exchanged food and destroyed it. From the decades after the arrival of Columbus to the mid-eighteenth century, food functioned together with the alcohol, furs, trade goods, and wampum that Indians and Europeans imbued with practical and symbolic meanings. These cross-cultural dealings ensured the existence of a type of Native and non-Native diplomacy called forest diplomacy—and thus of peace. Food sharing, like other practices, could work within the framework of a commodity-exchange economy and a gift-exchange economy. The overlap between these two economies permitted creative misunderstandings and cooperation, while also fostering conflict. Cooperative food exchange was paralleled by battles over commodities, including the destruction of crops and attacks against domesticated animals. Europeans employed victual warfare against other Europeans during military conflicts of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; in North America, Indian warriors, soldiers, and colonial civilians practiced victual warfare. Meanwhile, mainland colonists did not practice victual warfare against enslaved Africans because they did not need to; they simply controlled access to food. Slaveholders ensured that bondpeople went hungry by restricting consumption and limiting their abilities to use land to grow garden produce.","PeriodicalId":311322,"journal":{"name":"No Useless Mouth","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No Useless Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines how, between the 1500s and 1700s, two varying approaches toward dealing with food and hunger allowed inconsistent ideas about hunger to form, which in turn influenced how Natives and non-Natives exchanged food and destroyed it. From the decades after the arrival of Columbus to the mid-eighteenth century, food functioned together with the alcohol, furs, trade goods, and wampum that Indians and Europeans imbued with practical and symbolic meanings. These cross-cultural dealings ensured the existence of a type of Native and non-Native diplomacy called forest diplomacy—and thus of peace. Food sharing, like other practices, could work within the framework of a commodity-exchange economy and a gift-exchange economy. The overlap between these two economies permitted creative misunderstandings and cooperation, while also fostering conflict. Cooperative food exchange was paralleled by battles over commodities, including the destruction of crops and attacks against domesticated animals. Europeans employed victual warfare against other Europeans during military conflicts of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; in North America, Indian warriors, soldiers, and colonial civilians practiced victual warfare. Meanwhile, mainland colonists did not practice victual warfare against enslaved Africans because they did not need to; they simply controlled access to food. Slaveholders ensured that bondpeople went hungry by restricting consumption and limiting their abilities to use land to grow garden produce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国殖民时期的饥饿、住宿与暴力
本章考察了在16世纪到18世纪之间,处理食物和饥饿的两种不同方法是如何形成关于饥饿的不一致观点的,这反过来又影响了土著和非土著如何交换食物和破坏食物。从哥伦布到达后的几十年到18世纪中叶,食物与印第安人和欧洲人注入实际和象征意义的酒、皮草、贸易商品和棉花一起发挥作用。这些跨文化的交易确保了一种称为森林外交的本土和非本土外交的存在,从而确保了和平。与其他做法一样,食物共享可以在商品交换经济和礼物交换经济的框架内发挥作用。这两个经济体之间的重叠允许创造性的误解和合作,同时也助长了冲突。与合作交换食物同时发生的还有争夺商品的战争,包括破坏庄稼和攻击家畜。在17世纪和18世纪的军事冲突中,欧洲人对其他欧洲人进行了食物战;在北美,印第安战士、士兵和殖民地平民进行食物战争。与此同时,大陆殖民者没有对被奴役的非洲人进行食物战争,因为他们不需要这样做;他们只是控制食物的获取。奴隶主通过限制消费和限制奴隶使用土地种植农产品的能力来确保奴隶挨饿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5. Fighting Hunger, Fearing Violence after the Revolutionary War 4. Black Victual Warriors and Hunger Creation 1. Hunger, Accommodation, and Violence in Colonial America Victual Imperialism and U.S. Indian Policy Conclusion: Why Native and Black Revolutionaries Lost the Fight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1