An Overview of Methodologies to Predict Lean Blowout Limits for Gas Turbine Combustors

S. Lei, H. Yong
{"title":"An Overview of Methodologies to Predict Lean Blowout Limits for Gas Turbine Combustors","authors":"S. Lei, H. Yong","doi":"10.1109/IBCAST.2019.8667224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lean blowout (LBO) is a critical aspect of combustion performance for gas turbine combustors. During the past decades, three major prediction methodologies for the LBO limits, i.e. the semi-empirical model, the numerical prediction method and the hybrid prediction method are proposed. The semi-empirical models are derived mainly based on two kinds of physics-based models, i.e. the characteristic time (CT) model and the perfect stirred reactor (PSR) model. Among these semi-empirical models, Lefebvre’s LBO model that is based on the PSR model had been validated on 8 different aero gas turbine combustors with the prediction uncertainty ±30% and applied widely on the prediction of the LBO limits. Subsequently, a series of studies have been done to further develop Lefebvre’s LBO model. The numerical prediction methods are studied increasingly with the dramatically increase of the computing power. Based on the open literature, the best prediction uncertainty of the numerical prediction methods could be within 14% for a fixed combustor configuration with 3 kinds of fuels. More validations of different combustor configurations, atomization and dispersion models are required for the further application of numerical prediction methods. The hybrid prediction methods combine the semi-empirical models and the numerical methods simultaneously and could be divided into 2 types, i.e. the numerical and the semi-empirical based hybrid methods. The numerical based hybrid prediction method requires more validations and some general criteria for different configurations and operating conditions. The semi-empirical based hybrid prediction method could achieve maximum and average prediction uncertainties about ±15% and ±5%, respectively, for 10 combustor configurations. In summary, all the prediction methodologies should be further developed to achieve much more accurate prediction for the LBO limits as well as ensure the good generality.","PeriodicalId":335329,"journal":{"name":"2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST.2019.8667224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The lean blowout (LBO) is a critical aspect of combustion performance for gas turbine combustors. During the past decades, three major prediction methodologies for the LBO limits, i.e. the semi-empirical model, the numerical prediction method and the hybrid prediction method are proposed. The semi-empirical models are derived mainly based on two kinds of physics-based models, i.e. the characteristic time (CT) model and the perfect stirred reactor (PSR) model. Among these semi-empirical models, Lefebvre’s LBO model that is based on the PSR model had been validated on 8 different aero gas turbine combustors with the prediction uncertainty ±30% and applied widely on the prediction of the LBO limits. Subsequently, a series of studies have been done to further develop Lefebvre’s LBO model. The numerical prediction methods are studied increasingly with the dramatically increase of the computing power. Based on the open literature, the best prediction uncertainty of the numerical prediction methods could be within 14% for a fixed combustor configuration with 3 kinds of fuels. More validations of different combustor configurations, atomization and dispersion models are required for the further application of numerical prediction methods. The hybrid prediction methods combine the semi-empirical models and the numerical methods simultaneously and could be divided into 2 types, i.e. the numerical and the semi-empirical based hybrid methods. The numerical based hybrid prediction method requires more validations and some general criteria for different configurations and operating conditions. The semi-empirical based hybrid prediction method could achieve maximum and average prediction uncertainties about ±15% and ±5%, respectively, for 10 combustor configurations. In summary, all the prediction methodologies should be further developed to achieve much more accurate prediction for the LBO limits as well as ensure the good generality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测燃气轮机燃烧室贫爆限的方法综述
贫爆是燃气轮机燃烧室燃烧性能的一个重要方面。近几十年来,提出了三种主要的LBO极限预测方法,即半经验模型、数值预测方法和混合预测方法。半经验模型主要基于两种基于物理的模型,即特征时间(CT)模型和完美搅拌反应器(PSR)模型。在这些半经验模型中,基于PSR模型的Lefebvre LBO模型在8种不同的航空燃气轮机燃烧室上进行了验证,预测不确定性为±30%,广泛应用于LBO极限的预测。随后,人们进行了一系列研究,进一步发展了列斐伏尔的杠杆收购模型。随着计算能力的急剧提高,数值预测方法的研究日益增多。根据公开文献,对于3种燃料的固定燃烧室配置,数值预测方法的最佳预测不确定性在14%以内。为了进一步应用数值预测方法,还需要对不同的燃烧室配置、雾化和分散模型进行更多的验证。混合预测方法将半经验模型与数值方法相结合,可分为数值方法和半经验混合方法两种。基于数值的混合预测方法需要进行更多的验证,并针对不同的配置和运行条件制定一些通用准则。基于半经验的混合预测方法对10种燃烧室构型的最大预测不确定性为±15%,平均预测不确定性为±5%。总之,所有的预测方法都应该进一步发展,以实现对杠杆收购上限的更准确的预测,并确保良好的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Survey of Techniques and Technologies Used in Transmit Path of Transmit Receive Module of AESA Radar Testing-based Model Learning Approach for Legacy Components Pic Microcontroller Based Power Factor Correction for both Leading and Lagging Loads using Compensation Method Speed Tracking of Spark Ignition Engines using Higher Order Sliding Mode Control Survey of Authentication Schemes for Health Monitoring: A Subset of Cyber Physical System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1