Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46 Tahun 2010 Terhadap Hak Dan Kewajiban Keperdataan Anak Hasil Pernikahan Siri Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan

Ahmad Farhan Ilahi, A. Aspandi, Sayehu Sayehu
{"title":"Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46 Tahun 2010 Terhadap Hak Dan Kewajiban Keperdataan Anak Hasil Pernikahan Siri Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan","authors":"Ahmad Farhan Ilahi, A. Aspandi, Sayehu Sayehu","doi":"10.29300/qys.v8i1.10327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 of 2010 accommodates the civil rights and obligations of children of sirri marriages. This decision has implications for civil rights and obligations that are not stipulated by Law Number 16 of 2019 amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This study aims to analyze the implications of the results of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 on the civil rights of children of unregistered marriages with their biological fathers. This study also aims to analyze the implications of the results of the Constitutional Court decision No. 46 of 2010 on the rights and obligations of children of unregistered marriages regarding the provisions of Law No. 16 of 2019 amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This research is a type of qualitative research that reveals the implications of civil law and rights and obligations for children of sirri marriages. This research is also library research, examining the implications of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 on the civil rights and obligations of children of siri marriages that are not stipulated by Law Number 16 of 2019 amendment to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. The primary source of research data is the document resulting from the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 concerning children of sirri marriages. This research is also supported by secondary sources in the form of documents resulting from other decisions, as well as related research results. This research data collection method through documentation of primary sources and secondary sources. This study uses a normative juridical approach by explaining the implications of civil rights and obligations for children of sirri marriages with the perspective of the results of the Constitutional Court’s decision. The results of the study show that the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 has implications for the civil rights of children of siri marriages with their biological fathers but must be based on reliable evidence. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 has implications for the rights and obligations for children of a siri marriage with legitimate children as regulated in articles 45 to 49 of Law Number 16 of 2019 amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Keywords: Constitutional Court, Civil Rights and Obligations, Sirri Marriage","PeriodicalId":155650,"journal":{"name":"Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29300/qys.v8i1.10327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 of 2010 accommodates the civil rights and obligations of children of sirri marriages. This decision has implications for civil rights and obligations that are not stipulated by Law Number 16 of 2019 amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This study aims to analyze the implications of the results of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 on the civil rights of children of unregistered marriages with their biological fathers. This study also aims to analyze the implications of the results of the Constitutional Court decision No. 46 of 2010 on the rights and obligations of children of unregistered marriages regarding the provisions of Law No. 16 of 2019 amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This research is a type of qualitative research that reveals the implications of civil law and rights and obligations for children of sirri marriages. This research is also library research, examining the implications of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 on the civil rights and obligations of children of siri marriages that are not stipulated by Law Number 16 of 2019 amendment to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. The primary source of research data is the document resulting from the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 concerning children of sirri marriages. This research is also supported by secondary sources in the form of documents resulting from other decisions, as well as related research results. This research data collection method through documentation of primary sources and secondary sources. This study uses a normative juridical approach by explaining the implications of civil rights and obligations for children of sirri marriages with the perspective of the results of the Constitutional Court’s decision. The results of the study show that the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 has implications for the civil rights of children of siri marriages with their biological fathers but must be based on reliable evidence. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 of 2010 has implications for the rights and obligations for children of a siri marriage with legitimate children as regulated in articles 45 to 49 of Law Number 16 of 2019 amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Keywords: Constitutional Court, Civil Rights and Obligations, Sirri Marriage
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010年宪法第46条裁决对Siri结婚后女儿的童贞权利和义务的影响影响于1974年第1条婚姻法的修订
摘要:2010年宪法法院第46号判决规定了伊斯兰婚姻子女的公民权利和义务。这一决定涉及2019年第16号法律对1974年第1号关于婚姻的法律的修正案未规定的公民权利和义务。本研究旨在分析2010年第46号宪法法院关于与亲生父亲未登记婚姻的子女的公民权利的决定结果的含义。本研究还旨在分析2010年宪法法院关于未登记婚姻子女的权利和义务的第46号判决结果对2019年第16号法修正案1974年第1号法关于婚姻的规定的影响。本研究是一种定性研究,揭示了民事法律的含义和sirri婚姻的子女的权利和义务。本研究也是图书馆研究,研究了2010年第46号宪法法院关于siri婚姻子女的公民权利和义务的决定的影响,这些决定没有在2019年第16号法律修正案中对1974年关于婚姻的第1号法律作出规定。研究数据的主要来源是2010年第46号宪法法院关于siri婚姻子女的决定所产生的文件。本研究还得到了其他决策产生的文件以及相关研究结果的二手来源的支持。本研究的资料收集方法通过文献资料的一手来源和第二手来源。本研究采用规范的司法方法,从宪法法院判决结果的角度解释sirri婚姻子女的公民权利和义务的含义。研究结果表明,2010年第46号宪法法院的判决对与亲生父亲结婚的子女的公民权利有影响,但必须以可靠的证据为基础。《宪法法院2010年第46号决定》对《关于婚姻的1974年第1号法》的修正案《2019年第16号法》第45至49条规定的与合法子女结婚的未成年子女的权利和义务产生了影响。关键词:宪法法院,公民权利与义务,婚姻
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Produk Hukum Corporate Social Responsibility Dalam Pembangunan Daerah. Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Penyusunan Peraturan Desa Di Indonesia Hukum Adat Dari Tradisi Perkawinan (Uang Japuik Dan Uang Hilang) Yang Berasal Dari Daerah Padang Pariaman Sumatera Barat Implementasi Hukum Terhadap Upah Pekerja Dibawah UMR Praktik Jual Beli Minyak Solar Eceran Dalam Perspektif Ibnu Taimiyah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1