정리금융회사�? 대한 조세지�? 제공방안 분�? (How to Provide Tax Benefits to Resolution Financial Institution)

Byung Wook Jun
{"title":"정리금융회사�? 대한 조세지�? 제공방안 분�? (How to Provide Tax Benefits to Resolution Financial Institution)","authors":"Byung Wook Jun","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3185954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Korean Abstract 정리금융회사�? 대한 과세제�?�는 공공재�? 예금보험서비스를 제공하는 비�?리법�?��?� 성격�?�?� �?법�? 주�?회사로 설립�?� 결과 �?리내국법�?�으로 취급�?�어 경�?실�?�? 따�?� 거액�?� 법�?�세 부담�?� 발�?하는 문제�?�?� 있다. 본 연구는 정리금융회사가 정책�? 취지�? 따�?� 안정�? 예금보험사업�?� �?위할 수 있게 하기 위한 법�?�세 과세제�?��?� 개편방안�?� 제시하였다. 첫째, 주�?회사�?� 정리금융회사를 세법 개정�?�나 예금�?보호법�? 조�?변경�?� 통해 제한�?� 수�?�사업 발�? 소�?�? 대해서만 납세�?�무를 부담하는 비�?리법�?�으로 �?�정할 필요성�?� 있다. 둘째, 정리금융회사�?� 배당가능�?��?��? 대한 소�?공제를 �?용할 필요성�?� 있다. 셋째, 정리금융회사는 �?�반법�?�과 같�?� 과세소�?�?� 80%를 한�?�로 과세표준�?서 �?�월결�?금�?� 공제하는 대신 전액�?� 한�?�로 공제하�?��? 허용할 필요성�?� 있다. 마지막으로, 정리금융회사가 예금보험공사�?서 차입하는 �?금�? 대해 시가�? �?�한 �?��?비용�?� 계�?해서 과세소�?�?� �?소시키고, 잠재�? 과세가능성�?� 낮출 필요성�?� 있다. English Abstract Current corporate income taxation on the resolution financial institution(“RFI�? hereafter) is problematic because, in spite of its property of non-profit corporation to provide public goods through the deposit insurance service, it is classified as a profit-making company and, as a result, has the risk of unnecessarily taking substantial corporate tax burdens, which is up to unexpected future incomes. Based on analyses of this study, how to rationally revise tax laws to provide tax benefits to the RFI for the purpose of relieving corporate tax burdens are suggested as below. First, the RFI should be regarded as the non-profit corporation, which takes limited corporate tax burdens, to make its business features accorded with the scope of defined tax liabilities in the corporate income taxation. Second, accumulated residual incomes of the RFI should be treated as deductible in the corporate income taxation considering its nature of special purpose company. Third, net operating losses of the RFI should be fully offset against the 100% of the taxable income to consider its restricted business period. Finally, RFI’s loans from the depository insurance corporation should be charged with interests, reflecting fair-market rates, to reduce its taxable income and potential tax burdens.","PeriodicalId":166226,"journal":{"name":"Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) Research Paper Series","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3185954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Korean Abstract 정리금융회사�? 대한 과세제�?�는 공공재�? 예금보험서비스를 제공하는 비�?리법�?��?� 성격�?�?� �?법�? 주�?회사로 설립�?� 결과 �?리내국법�?�으로 취급�?�어 경�?실�?�? 따�?� 거액�?� 법�?�세 부담�?� 발�?하는 문제�?�?� 있다. 본 연구는 정리금융회사가 정책�? 취지�? 따�?� 안정�? 예금보험사업�?� �?위할 수 있게 하기 위한 법�?�세 과세제�?��?� 개편방안�?� 제시하였다. 첫째, 주�?회사�?� 정리금융회사를 세법 개정�?�나 예금�?보호법�? 조�?변경�?� 통해 제한�?� 수�?�사업 발�? 소�?�? 대해서만 납세�?�무를 부담하는 비�?리법�?�으로 �?�정할 필요성�?� 있다. 둘째, 정리금융회사�?� 배당가능�?��?��? 대한 소�?공제를 �?용할 필요성�?� 있다. 셋째, 정리금융회사는 �?�반법�?�과 같�?� 과세소�?�?� 80%를 한�?�로 과세표준�?서 �?�월결�?금�?� 공제하는 대신 전액�?� 한�?�로 공제하�?��? 허용할 필요성�?� 있다. 마지막으로, 정리금융회사가 예금보험공사�?서 차입하는 �?금�? 대해 시가�? �?�한 �?��?비용�?� 계�?해서 과세소�?�?� �?소시키고, 잠재�? 과세가능성�?� 낮출 필요성�?� 있다. English Abstract Current corporate income taxation on the resolution financial institution(“RFI�? hereafter) is problematic because, in spite of its property of non-profit corporation to provide public goods through the deposit insurance service, it is classified as a profit-making company and, as a result, has the risk of unnecessarily taking substantial corporate tax burdens, which is up to unexpected future incomes. Based on analyses of this study, how to rationally revise tax laws to provide tax benefits to the RFI for the purpose of relieving corporate tax burdens are suggested as below. First, the RFI should be regarded as the non-profit corporation, which takes limited corporate tax burdens, to make its business features accorded with the scope of defined tax liabilities in the corporate income taxation. Second, accumulated residual incomes of the RFI should be treated as deductible in the corporate income taxation considering its nature of special purpose company. Third, net operating losses of the RFI should be fully offset against the 100% of the taxable income to consider its restricted business period. Finally, RFI’s loans from the depository insurance corporation should be charged with interests, reflecting fair-market rates, to reduce its taxable income and potential tax burdens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是整理金融公司吗?大韩曹世志是提供方案的人吗?(How to Provide Tax Benefits to Resolution Financial Institution)
是Korean Abstract整理金融公司大韩课税制度我是公共财产提供存款保险服务的利息呢?�性质��?��?法�?�?成立公司?那是什么?《利国税法》你以为我是谁?什么情况?什么情况?根据�?�巨额�?��法?是负担吗?��脚?这是什么问题?�。本研究的政策是整理金融公司?主旨�?根据�?��稳定?储蓄保险事业呢?��?这是为了让他们做的事吗?我要缴课税,什么?是改编方案吗?提出了。第一,你要给我钱还是在公司?他说要修改金融公司的税法?存款呢?保护法呢?什么?边境?有什么限制?��?你是企业家吗?牛��?只对大海纳税吗?谁愿意负担他的钱?法律吗?��?有必要这么做吗?�。第二,是整理金融公司能分配吗?能分配吗?小�?对扣除�?有必要这么做吗?�。第三,整顿金融公司的方法是什么?像��?我在征税站我有八成呢课税标准是什么?西月牙骨和金子?这是全额扣除��?什么时候扣除?有必要允许吗?�。最后,整理金融公司是储蓄保险公社吗?借的是金子吗?大海市吗?�?怎么样?费用呢?��?所以征税处呢?��?点了牛再睡,好吗?有可能会征税吗?有必要降低吗?�。English Abstract Current corporate income taxation on the resolution financial institution(“RFI ?hereafter) is problematic because, in spite of its property of non-profit corporation to provide public goods through the deposit insurance service, it is classified as a profit-making company and;a result, has the risk of unnecessarily taking substantial corporate tax burdens, which is up to unexpected future incomes。Based on analyses of this study, how to rationally revise tax laws to provide tax benefits to the RFI for the purpose of relieving corporate tax burdens are suggested as below。First, the RFI should be regarded as the non-profit corporation, which takes limited corporate tax burdens,to make its business features accorded with the scope of defined tax liabilities in the corporate income taxation。Second, accumulated residual incomes of the RFI should be treated as deductible in the corporate income taxation considering its nature of special purpose company。Third, net operating losses of the RFI should be fully offset against the 100% of the taxable income to consider its restricted business period。Finally, RFI ' s loans from the depository insurance corporation should be charged with interests, reflecting fair-market rates, to reduce its taxable income and potential tax burdens。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EVT �? CAViaR 모형�? �?�한 국고채 VaR 예측모형 분�? (VaR Forecasts for Korea Treasury Bonds via EVT and CAViaR Models) 다(多)시장 정보를 활용한 금융시장 불안정성 지수 개발�? 관한 연구-CISS 방법론�?� 중심으로- (A Proposal for a Systemic Stress Index in Korea-A CISS Approach) 정리금융회사�? 대한 조세지�? 제공방안 분�? (How to Provide Tax Benefits to Resolution Financial Institution) 국내 신용카드사 제공서비스 분석과 시사점: 할인 및 적립 혜택을 중심으로(Analyzing the Pattern of Credit Card Companies’ Optional Services Based on Consumers’ Credit Card Usage in the Korean Credit Card Industry) 채무위기와 유동성 지원 제도의 효과 (The Effectiveness of Liquidity Provision During Debt Crises: Evidence from Korean Firm-Level Data)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1