{"title":"Rytų, vidurio ir Mažosios Lietuvos raštijos sandūros 1863, 1865 m. reformatų religinės didaktikos knygelėse","authors":"Birutė Kabašinskaitė","doi":"10.33918/26692449-24004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T H E CONFLUENCE OF THE WRITING OF EASTERN, CENTRAL LITHUANIA, AND LITHUANIA MINOR IN REFORMER BOOKS ON RELIGIOUS DIDACTICS FROM 1863 TO 1865\n\n\nThe article looks into five books on religious didactics published by the Calvinists in\nEisleben in 1863–1865: Atsiminimas da geroje adijnoje, Nusidawimas biedna Joniuka, Prisiwertimas grieszna żmogaus ing Diewą, Wartojmas arba meginimas patis sawę and Gromata Naszłaitela ing sawa mieła Iszganitoja, which bibliographers and historians claim to have been written by Alexander Raphael Moczulski. A textological analysis has revealed Prisiwertimas not to have been drafted by Moczulski. This is evidenced in the differences in the spelling and the language of the texts covered by the analysis, the mismatched hypernormalisms, and the specific characteristics of the edits made to Biblical quotes and hymns. Certain qualities of the language in Prisiwertimas demonstrate that, unlike Moczulski, the editor of this text was under the influence of both the subdialect of Biržai and the subdialects of the northern Panevėžys region further to the west. Furthermore, Prisiwertimas features a much larger number of unique morphological forms not recorded elsewhere, which indirectly reflect the typical truncation of the ending of the Panevėžys subdialect and the resultant uncertainty on the editor’s part with regard to how certain parts of the text were to be written.","PeriodicalId":335211,"journal":{"name":"Archivum Lithuanicum","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivum Lithuanicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33918/26692449-24004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
T H E CONFLUENCE OF THE WRITING OF EASTERN, CENTRAL LITHUANIA, AND LITHUANIA MINOR IN REFORMER BOOKS ON RELIGIOUS DIDACTICS FROM 1863 TO 1865
The article looks into five books on religious didactics published by the Calvinists in
Eisleben in 1863–1865: Atsiminimas da geroje adijnoje, Nusidawimas biedna Joniuka, Prisiwertimas grieszna żmogaus ing Diewą, Wartojmas arba meginimas patis sawę and Gromata Naszłaitela ing sawa mieła Iszganitoja, which bibliographers and historians claim to have been written by Alexander Raphael Moczulski. A textological analysis has revealed Prisiwertimas not to have been drafted by Moczulski. This is evidenced in the differences in the spelling and the language of the texts covered by the analysis, the mismatched hypernormalisms, and the specific characteristics of the edits made to Biblical quotes and hymns. Certain qualities of the language in Prisiwertimas demonstrate that, unlike Moczulski, the editor of this text was under the influence of both the subdialect of Biržai and the subdialects of the northern Panevėžys region further to the west. Furthermore, Prisiwertimas features a much larger number of unique morphological forms not recorded elsewhere, which indirectly reflect the typical truncation of the ending of the Panevėžys subdialect and the resultant uncertainty on the editor’s part with regard to how certain parts of the text were to be written.
东立陶宛、中立陶宛和小立陶宛在1863年至1865年宗教教义改革家著作中的写作合流本文考察了加尔文主义者伊斯莱本在1863年至1865年出版的五本宗教教义书:《Atsiminimas da geroje adijnoje》、《Nusidawimas biedna Joniuka》、《Prisiwertimas grieszna żmogaus ing diewei》、《Wartojmas arba meginimas patis sawei》和《Gromata Naszłaitela ing sawa mieła Iszganitoja》,书目编纂者和历史学家声称是亚历山大·Raphael Moczulski写的。一项文本分析表明,《普莉西沃提玛》并非由莫丘尔斯基起草。这可以从分析所涵盖的文本的拼写和语言差异、不匹配的超常态以及对圣经引文和赞美诗的编辑的具体特征中得到证明。priiwertimas语言的某些特性表明,与Moczulski不同,这篇文章的编辑受到Biržai的次方言和向西更远的北部Panevėžys地区的次方言的影响。此外,priiwertimas的特点是大量独特的形态学形式,没有记录在其他地方,这间接反映了Panevėžys子方言结尾的典型截断,以及编辑对文本某些部分如何书写的不确定性。