Implementation and Comparison Study of Single-Pulse and PWM control Method to Increase Regenerative Braking Efficiency for SRM

Stanislaus Hans RyanDita, S. Riyadi, F. B. Setiawan
{"title":"Implementation and Comparison Study of Single-Pulse and PWM control Method to Increase Regenerative Braking Efficiency for SRM","authors":"Stanislaus Hans RyanDita, S. Riyadi, F. B. Setiawan","doi":"10.1109/ICITEE56407.2022.9954114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Switched Reluctance Machine (SRM) is an electric drive that is often used in electric vehicles. In electric vehicles, regenerative braking is needed to minimize the energy wasted on conventional braking so that the wasted energy can be used for battery charging. Regenerative braking on SRM utilizes negative torque on the rotor when it moves away from the stator winding, so an appropriate control method is needed to get the optimum value of regenerative braking. The single-pulse method and the PWM control method are regenerative braking methods on SRM that are commonly used. The PWM control operation method includes magnetizing-freewheeling and magnetizing-demagnetizing modes. The single-pulse method is a method that gives one pulse at the time of excitation, then the PWM control method is a method that is carried out by providing a PWM signal during excitation. These two methods have very different characteristics. In this paper, we will present the results of a comparative trial between the two single pulse and PWM control methods at different speed variations, namely when the RPM is 1200, 1500, and 1800 to determine the efficiency of using regenerative braking on the SRM.","PeriodicalId":246279,"journal":{"name":"2022 14th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 14th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEE56407.2022.9954114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Switched Reluctance Machine (SRM) is an electric drive that is often used in electric vehicles. In electric vehicles, regenerative braking is needed to minimize the energy wasted on conventional braking so that the wasted energy can be used for battery charging. Regenerative braking on SRM utilizes negative torque on the rotor when it moves away from the stator winding, so an appropriate control method is needed to get the optimum value of regenerative braking. The single-pulse method and the PWM control method are regenerative braking methods on SRM that are commonly used. The PWM control operation method includes magnetizing-freewheeling and magnetizing-demagnetizing modes. The single-pulse method is a method that gives one pulse at the time of excitation, then the PWM control method is a method that is carried out by providing a PWM signal during excitation. These two methods have very different characteristics. In this paper, we will present the results of a comparative trial between the two single pulse and PWM control methods at different speed variations, namely when the RPM is 1200, 1500, and 1800 to determine the efficiency of using regenerative braking on the SRM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高SRM再生制动效率的单脉冲与PWM控制方法的实现与比较研究
开关磁阻电机(SRM)是一种常用于电动汽车的电驱动器。在电动汽车中,需要再生制动以最大限度地减少传统制动所浪费的能量,从而将浪费的能量用于电池充电。SRM的再生制动利用转子远离定子绕组时的负转矩,因此需要适当的控制方法来获得最佳的再生制动值。单脉冲控制方法和PWM控制方法是SRM上常用的再生制动方法。PWM控制工作方式包括磁化-自由旋转和磁化-退磁两种方式。单脉冲法是在励磁时给出一个脉冲的方法,那么PWM控制方法是在励磁时提供PWM信号来实现的方法。这两种方法有非常不同的特点。在本文中,我们将展示两种单脉冲和PWM控制方法在不同速度变化下的对比试验结果,即当RPM为1200,1500和1800时,以确定在SRM上使用再生制动的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Trust Perception during Information Evaluation Comparative Study of Multi-channel and Omni-channel on Supply Chain Management Classifying Stress Mental State by using Power Spectral Density of Electroencephalography (EEG) Development of CNN Pruning Method for Earthquake Signal Imagery Classification Object Selection Using LSTM Networks for Spontaneous Gaze-Based Interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1