Rejuvenating Green OA for a Greener Pasture

N. Sathyanarayana
{"title":"Rejuvenating Green OA for a Greener Pasture","authors":"N. Sathyanarayana","doi":"10.5703/1288284317201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a critical sequel to John Dove’s paper titled “Maximum\n Dissemination: A possible model for society journals in the humanities and social\n sciences to support Open while retaining their subscription revenue”, presented at the\n Charleston Conference 2019. Dove’s OA advocacy has included both gold and green. Dove’s\n innovative model, which makes full use of the green route to achieve maximum\n dissemination of authors’ works through open repositories, suggests a switch in the\n functional responsibility for depositing author’s manuscript from author to publisher.\n The model has publishers to act as agents of the authors as much through the green route\n as their subscription route. Dove has suggested this maximum use of the green path by\n the publisher for specific journals in specific disciplines. This paper looks to examine\n the feasibility of green OA model in this context, and then to consider other ways to\n expand on this idea to other green OA supporting publishers. It further looks at the\n possibilities of the model driving the re-emergence of green OA as a favoured option for\n facilitating immediate and parallel dissemination of authors’ papers through both green\n and subscription channels.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper is a critical sequel to John Dove’s paper titled “Maximum Dissemination: A possible model for society journals in the humanities and social sciences to support Open while retaining their subscription revenue”, presented at the Charleston Conference 2019. Dove’s OA advocacy has included both gold and green. Dove’s innovative model, which makes full use of the green route to achieve maximum dissemination of authors’ works through open repositories, suggests a switch in the functional responsibility for depositing author’s manuscript from author to publisher. The model has publishers to act as agents of the authors as much through the green route as their subscription route. Dove has suggested this maximum use of the green path by the publisher for specific journals in specific disciplines. This paper looks to examine the feasibility of green OA model in this context, and then to consider other ways to expand on this idea to other green OA supporting publishers. It further looks at the possibilities of the model driving the re-emergence of green OA as a favoured option for facilitating immediate and parallel dissemination of authors’ papers through both green and subscription channels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
振兴绿色OA,打造绿色牧场
这篇论文是John Dove在2019年查尔斯顿会议上发表的题为“最大传播:人文社会科学社会期刊在保持订阅收入的同时支持开放的可能模式”的论文的重要后续。多芬的开放获取倡议包括金色和绿色。多芬的创新模式充分利用绿色路线,通过开放资源库实现作者作品的最大传播,这意味着将作者手稿存放的职能责任从作者转移到出版商。这种模式让出版商充当作者的代理,就像他们通过绿色路线订阅一样。多芬建议出版商对特定学科的特定期刊最大限度地使用绿色路径。本文旨在研究绿色OA模式在此背景下的可行性,然后考虑将此理念扩展到其他绿色OA支持出版商的其他方法。它进一步探讨了该模式推动绿色OA重新出现的可能性,作为一种受欢迎的选择,通过绿色和订阅渠道促进作者论文的即时和并行传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Synthesis: Research Resources to Research Experiences The Time Has Come... To Build, Reflect, and Analyze Connections Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data Collections Data, Tools, and Strategy: Applying R, Tableau, and Excel to Print Assessment Acquiring E-books – Does (Should) Workflow Play a Role? A Collaborative Imperative? Libraries and the Emerging Scholarly Communication Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1