{"title":"TERMS DERIVED FROM THE STEM CONCEPTIN V. V. KOLESOV’S COGNITIVE METAPHORS","authors":"Lyudmila N. Donina, Elena V. Kupchik","doi":"10.21638/11701/9785288063183.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we discuss cognitive metaphors related to the conceptual field of language, as represented in V. V. Kolesov’s heritage, particularly in his theory of concepts. Initial data were collected from Kolesov’s scholarly researches and nonfiction books published in the last 20 years (2001–2021). In arranging the data we considered such factors as the character of metaphorical expressions, as well as the internal connection between the source and goal areas. Our article is probably the first to tackle the structure of V. V. Kolesov’s cognitive metaphors impicitly underlying the basic terms of conceptology, such as “concept”, “conceptum”, “idea” (Russian kontsept, kontseptum, contseptsiya respectively). The background agaist which these metaphors are demonstrated, is formed by the scholar’s metaphoric ideas of various language phenomena. We also determine the peculiarities of the metaphoric way of defining terms, as well as its place among other definition types. Sometimes metaphorical expressions are used as terms (cf. “conceptum” vs “the grain of primordial sense”), but more often is the situation when they are included into the structure of definitions. Whenever “conceptum” is described using the method of semantic constants, metaphors are primarily concentrated in such parts as “base” and “conditions”. The number of metaphors grow if a notion is relatively new and if the metatext underlying the constant is of metaphoric nature. We can attest multiple metaphors pertaining to linguistic and cognitive phenomena, which differ as to their topics, structure and implementation range. Metaphorical models are used to describe both objects related to language as a whole, and those related to its elements, segmental and suprasegmental units, basic language concepts, language rules and processes. Our corpus of metaphorical models includes vital, anthropomorphic, zoomorphic, phytomorphic, physical, objective and other metaphors. We can single out the most common of them, namely “language as a human being”, “language as a plant”, “language as an object” and “language as material”. It can be claimed without doubt that metaphorical expressions are inseparable part of V. V. Kolesov’s scholarly style. Refs 11.","PeriodicalId":438261,"journal":{"name":"St. Petersburg University Studies in Social Sciences & Humanities","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St. Petersburg University Studies in Social Sciences & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288063183.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article we discuss cognitive metaphors related to the conceptual field of language, as represented in V. V. Kolesov’s heritage, particularly in his theory of concepts. Initial data were collected from Kolesov’s scholarly researches and nonfiction books published in the last 20 years (2001–2021). In arranging the data we considered such factors as the character of metaphorical expressions, as well as the internal connection between the source and goal areas. Our article is probably the first to tackle the structure of V. V. Kolesov’s cognitive metaphors impicitly underlying the basic terms of conceptology, such as “concept”, “conceptum”, “idea” (Russian kontsept, kontseptum, contseptsiya respectively). The background agaist which these metaphors are demonstrated, is formed by the scholar’s metaphoric ideas of various language phenomena. We also determine the peculiarities of the metaphoric way of defining terms, as well as its place among other definition types. Sometimes metaphorical expressions are used as terms (cf. “conceptum” vs “the grain of primordial sense”), but more often is the situation when they are included into the structure of definitions. Whenever “conceptum” is described using the method of semantic constants, metaphors are primarily concentrated in such parts as “base” and “conditions”. The number of metaphors grow if a notion is relatively new and if the metatext underlying the constant is of metaphoric nature. We can attest multiple metaphors pertaining to linguistic and cognitive phenomena, which differ as to their topics, structure and implementation range. Metaphorical models are used to describe both objects related to language as a whole, and those related to its elements, segmental and suprasegmental units, basic language concepts, language rules and processes. Our corpus of metaphorical models includes vital, anthropomorphic, zoomorphic, phytomorphic, physical, objective and other metaphors. We can single out the most common of them, namely “language as a human being”, “language as a plant”, “language as an object” and “language as material”. It can be claimed without doubt that metaphorical expressions are inseparable part of V. V. Kolesov’s scholarly style. Refs 11.
在本文中,我们将讨论与语言概念领域相关的认知隐喻,这体现在V. V. Kolesov的遗产中,特别是在他的概念理论中。最初的数据收集自koolesov在过去20年(2001-2021)出版的学术研究和非小说类书籍。在整理数据时,我们考虑了隐喻表达的特征以及源域和目标域之间的内在联系等因素。我们的文章可能是第一个解决v.v.科列索夫的认知隐喻结构的文章,这些隐喻隐含在概念学的基本术语之下,如“概念”,“概念”,“想法”(俄语分别为kontsept, kontseptum, contseptsiya)。这些隐喻的背景是由学者对各种语言现象的隐喻观念所形成的。我们还确定了定义术语的隐喻方式的特点,以及它在其他定义类型中的地位。有时隐喻性表达被用作术语(如“conceptum”和“the grain of primordial sense”),但更多的情况是它们被包含在定义的结构中。每当用语义常数的方法描述“概念”时,隐喻主要集中在“基础”和“条件”等部分。如果一个概念相对较新,并且该常量的元文本具有隐喻性,那么隐喻的数量就会增加。我们可以证明,语言和认知现象中存在多种隐喻,它们在主题、结构和实现范围上各不相同。隐喻模型既用于描述与语言整体相关的对象,也用于描述与语言要素、语段和超语段单位、基本语言概念、语言规则和过程相关的对象。我们的隐喻模型包括生命隐喻、拟人隐喻、兽形隐喻、植物隐喻、物理隐喻、客观隐喻和其他隐喻。我们可以挑出其中最常见的几种,即“作为人的语言”、“作为植物的语言”、“作为物的语言”和“作为材料的语言”。毫无疑问,隐喻性表达是科尔索夫学术风格不可分割的一部分。参考文献11。