A. B. DERMAN AGAINST V. V. ERMILOV: FROM THE HISTORY OF SOVIET CHEKHOVIAN STUDIES OF THE 1940S

V. S. Zaitsev
{"title":"A. B. DERMAN AGAINST V. V. ERMILOV: FROM THE HISTORY OF SOVIET CHEKHOVIAN STUDIES OF THE 1940S","authors":"V. S. Zaitsev","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2022-1-74-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the discussions of two books by V. V. Ermilov (“Chekhov” and “Dramaturgy of Anton Chekhov”). The discussions were held at the publishing house “Molodaya Gvardiya” and at the meeting of the commission on the theory of literature and criticism of the USSR Writers’ Union in 1946 and 1948. A. B. Derman spoke at both meetings with consistent criticism of V. V. Ermilov’s works. Shorthand records of A. B. Derman, V. B. Shklovsky, L. M. Myshkovskaya and others allow us to consider the specific features of Chekhov scholars disputes of the 1940s and to assess their influence on the subsequent development of Soviet Chekhovian studies.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Text","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2022-1-74-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the discussions of two books by V. V. Ermilov (“Chekhov” and “Dramaturgy of Anton Chekhov”). The discussions were held at the publishing house “Molodaya Gvardiya” and at the meeting of the commission on the theory of literature and criticism of the USSR Writers’ Union in 1946 and 1948. A. B. Derman spoke at both meetings with consistent criticism of V. V. Ermilov’s works. Shorthand records of A. B. Derman, V. B. Shklovsky, L. M. Myshkovskaya and others allow us to consider the specific features of Chekhov scholars disputes of the 1940s and to assess their influence on the subsequent development of Soviet Chekhovian studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A. b.德曼反对v. v.叶尔米洛夫:从20世纪40年代苏联契诃夫研究史看
这篇文章专门讨论了v·v·叶尔米洛夫的两本书(《契诃夫》和《安东·契诃夫的戏剧学》)。讨论是在Molodaya Gvardiya出版社和1946年和1948年苏联作家联盟文学理论和批评委员会的会议上举行的。a·b·德曼(A. B. Derman)在两次会议上都对v·v·叶尔米洛夫的作品提出了一贯的批评。A. B. Derman、V. B. Shklovsky、L. M. Myshkovskaya等人的速记记录使我们能够考虑20世纪40年代契诃夫学者争论的具体特征,并评估它们对苏联契诃夫研究的后续发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
POLYSITUATIVE SEMANTICS OF ACTION PREDICATES IN THE LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF FOREIGNERS STUDYING RUSSIAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE VERB «TO EXAMINE») GRIBOEDOV AND ELDER ARCHAISTS ARCHETYPES OF FEAR AND THE PROBLEM OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE GOTHIC HORROR IN A SYMBOLIST NOVEL TYPES OF TEXT EQUIVALENTS IN EDITIONS OF M. YU. LERMONTOV’S POEM «DEMON» GRIBOEDOV AND WITTINESS IN THE USA: UM, RAZUM AND ZAUM’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1