{"title":"Past Response to Grondona System","authors":"","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-8302-9.ch016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Grondona system was sufficiently well-known during the 1950s to be the subject of debate in the British Parliament in 1958, when it was vigorously praised by supporters, as well as in the press. Examples of this support are given in this chapter, which show how those who took the time to study the Grondona system recognized its unique strengths and strongly recommended its adoption by government. Unfortunately, when the British government finally set up a committee in 1976 to consider the problem of commodity price instability, it was chaired by a long-term advocate of the international buffer-stock system advocated by UNCTAD. As Grondona predicted, the result was that the committee's report contained no substantive criticism of his system but merely reiterated the government's existing policy of continuing participation in UNCTAD negotiations – to no effect nearly half a century later.","PeriodicalId":193673,"journal":{"name":"Stabilizing Currency and Preserving Economic Sovereignty Using the Grondona System","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stabilizing Currency and Preserving Economic Sovereignty Using the Grondona System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8302-9.ch016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Grondona system was sufficiently well-known during the 1950s to be the subject of debate in the British Parliament in 1958, when it was vigorously praised by supporters, as well as in the press. Examples of this support are given in this chapter, which show how those who took the time to study the Grondona system recognized its unique strengths and strongly recommended its adoption by government. Unfortunately, when the British government finally set up a committee in 1976 to consider the problem of commodity price instability, it was chaired by a long-term advocate of the international buffer-stock system advocated by UNCTAD. As Grondona predicted, the result was that the committee's report contained no substantive criticism of his system but merely reiterated the government's existing policy of continuing participation in UNCTAD negotiations – to no effect nearly half a century later.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去对格隆多纳系统的反应
格隆多纳系统在20世纪50年代非常出名,以至于1958年成为英国议会辩论的主题,当时它得到了支持者和媒体的大力赞扬。本章给出了这种支持的例子,这些例子表明,那些花时间研究格隆多纳系统的人是如何认识到它的独特优势并强烈建议政府采用它的。不幸的是,当英国政府最终在1976年成立了一个委员会来考虑商品价格不稳定的问题时,这个委员会的主席是一位贸发会议所倡导的国际缓冲储备制度的长期倡导者。正如格隆多纳所预测的那样,结果是委员会的报告没有对他的制度提出实质性的批评,而只是重申了政府继续参与贸发会议谈判的现有政策——在近半个世纪后没有任何效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unsustainability of Debt-Based Money The Grondona System of Conditional Currency Convertibility Based on Primary Commodities Simulation of Four National CRDs' Operations Potential for Further Evolution of CRDs Inevitable Failure of Inconvertible Paper Money
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1