Pyramidal Groups and the Separation Between Ownership and Control in Italy

Marc Bianchi, M. Bianco, L. Enriques
{"title":"Pyramidal Groups and the Separation Between Ownership and Control in Italy","authors":"Marc Bianchi, M. Bianco, L. Enriques","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.293882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper provides an overview of the Italian corporate governance system, focusing mainly on the ownership of Italian firms and on the legal and institutional framework. Like those of most other continental European countries, the Italian corporate governance system features a high concentration of direct ownership, for both unlisted and listed companies; at first glance this suggests a very limited degree of separation between ownership and control. The analysis of direct ownership and of the identity of owners reveals that a major role is played by families, coalitions, the State, and above all by other companies: the largest stake in listed and unlisted companies is held by other non-financial or holding companies. In fact, more than 50 percent of all Italian industrial companies belong to pyramidal groups. Taking the pyramidal structure into account, one can identify ultimate owners and evaluate the actual degree of separation between ownership and control. Measuring separation as the amount of capital controlled per unit of capital owned, we find that in 1996 the average figure was 2.4 for listed companies; it was higher for private non-banking groups (4.5) and lower for State-controlled groups (1.6); for the ten largest private groups, the ratio was approximately 5. In Italy, then, pyramidal groups headed by families, coalitions, or the State have supplanted other forms of separation, whereas financial institutions have played a very limited role in fostering separation. This structure, reinforced by cross-ownership, circular ownership, and interlocking directorates, has allowed stable control over both small and large companies, with few control changes, especially hostile takeovers. The paper first provides a brief description of the legal and institutional framework and in particular of the provisions affecting corporate governance mechanisms (shareholders' rights, directors' liability etc.), and of disclosure rules. Next comes a quantitative description for listed and unlisted companies: ownership structure, taking account of groups; the control structure; the diffusion of pyramidal groups; and an evaluation of the separation between ownership and control. This is followed by a discussion of changes and trends: the simplification of the pyramidal structure due to privatization and to the financial difficulties of private groups; the increasing role of financial institutions; the debate that has led to reform of some corporate governance mechanisms and to a new law for listed companies, in force since July 1998.","PeriodicalId":272257,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"145","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.293882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145

Abstract

The paper provides an overview of the Italian corporate governance system, focusing mainly on the ownership of Italian firms and on the legal and institutional framework. Like those of most other continental European countries, the Italian corporate governance system features a high concentration of direct ownership, for both unlisted and listed companies; at first glance this suggests a very limited degree of separation between ownership and control. The analysis of direct ownership and of the identity of owners reveals that a major role is played by families, coalitions, the State, and above all by other companies: the largest stake in listed and unlisted companies is held by other non-financial or holding companies. In fact, more than 50 percent of all Italian industrial companies belong to pyramidal groups. Taking the pyramidal structure into account, one can identify ultimate owners and evaluate the actual degree of separation between ownership and control. Measuring separation as the amount of capital controlled per unit of capital owned, we find that in 1996 the average figure was 2.4 for listed companies; it was higher for private non-banking groups (4.5) and lower for State-controlled groups (1.6); for the ten largest private groups, the ratio was approximately 5. In Italy, then, pyramidal groups headed by families, coalitions, or the State have supplanted other forms of separation, whereas financial institutions have played a very limited role in fostering separation. This structure, reinforced by cross-ownership, circular ownership, and interlocking directorates, has allowed stable control over both small and large companies, with few control changes, especially hostile takeovers. The paper first provides a brief description of the legal and institutional framework and in particular of the provisions affecting corporate governance mechanisms (shareholders' rights, directors' liability etc.), and of disclosure rules. Next comes a quantitative description for listed and unlisted companies: ownership structure, taking account of groups; the control structure; the diffusion of pyramidal groups; and an evaluation of the separation between ownership and control. This is followed by a discussion of changes and trends: the simplification of the pyramidal structure due to privatization and to the financial difficulties of private groups; the increasing role of financial institutions; the debate that has led to reform of some corporate governance mechanisms and to a new law for listed companies, in force since July 1998.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金字塔集团与意大利所有权与控制权的分离
本文概述了意大利公司治理制度,主要关注意大利公司的所有权以及法律和制度框架。与大多数其他欧洲大陆国家一样,意大利公司治理体系的特点是直接所有权高度集中,无论是非上市公司还是上市公司;乍一看,这表明所有权和控制权之间的分离程度非常有限。对直接所有权和所有者身份的分析表明,家庭、联盟、国家以及最重要的是其他公司发挥了主要作用:上市公司和非上市公司的最大股份由其他非金融或控股公司持有。事实上,超过50%的意大利工业公司都属于金字塔集团。考虑到金字塔结构,人们可以确定最终所有者并评估所有权和控制权之间的实际分离程度。以每单位拥有的资本控制的资本数量来衡量分离,我们发现1996年上市公司的平均数字是2.4;私人非银行集团的比率较高(4.5),国有控股集团的比率较低(1.6);对于10家最大的私营集团,这一比例约为5。因此,在意大利,以家庭、联盟或国家为首的金字塔集团取代了其他形式的分离,而金融机构在促进分离方面发挥的作用非常有限。这种结构得到了交叉所有权、循环所有权和连锁董事会的强化,使得对大小公司的控制都保持稳定,控制权几乎没有变化,尤其是敌意收购。本文首先简要介绍了法律和制度框架,特别是影响公司治理机制(股东权利、董事责任等)和披露规则的规定。接下来是对上市公司和非上市公司的定量描述:考虑集团的股权结构;控制结构;金字塔群的扩散;以及对所有权和控制权分离的评估。随后讨论了变化和趋势:由于私有化和私营集团的财政困难,金字塔结构的简化;金融机构的作用日益增强;这场辩论导致了一些公司治理机制的改革,并出台了一部针对上市公司的新法律,该法自1998年7月起生效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pyramidal Groups and the Separation Between Ownership and Control in Italy Are Some Outside Directors Better than Others? Evidence from Director Appointments by Fortune 1000 Firms Winner Take All: Competition, Strategy, and the Structure of Returns in the Internet Economy Global Trends in IPO Methods: Book Building vs. Auctions with Endogenous Entry Capital Structure and Managerial Compensation: The Effects of Remuneration Seniority
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1