Classifying Multilingual User Feedback using Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Christoph Stanik, Marlo Häring, W. Maalej
{"title":"Classifying Multilingual User Feedback using Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning","authors":"Christoph Stanik, Marlo Häring, W. Maalej","doi":"10.1109/REW.2019.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rise of social media like Twitter and of software distribution platforms like app stores, users got various ways to express their opinion about software products. Popular software vendors get user feedback thousandfold per day. Research has shown that such feedback contains valuable information for software development teams such as problem reports or feature and support inquires. Since the manual analysis of user feedback is cumbersome and hard to manage many researchers and tool vendors suggested to use automated analyses based on traditional supervised machine learning approaches. In this work, we compare the results of traditional machine learning and deep learning in classifying user feedback in English and Italian into problem reports, inquiries, and irrelevant. Our results show that using traditional machine learning, we can still achieve comparable results to deep learning, although we collected thousands of labels.","PeriodicalId":166923,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2019.00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

With the rise of social media like Twitter and of software distribution platforms like app stores, users got various ways to express their opinion about software products. Popular software vendors get user feedback thousandfold per day. Research has shown that such feedback contains valuable information for software development teams such as problem reports or feature and support inquires. Since the manual analysis of user feedback is cumbersome and hard to manage many researchers and tool vendors suggested to use automated analyses based on traditional supervised machine learning approaches. In this work, we compare the results of traditional machine learning and deep learning in classifying user feedback in English and Italian into problem reports, inquiries, and irrelevant. Our results show that using traditional machine learning, we can still achieve comparable results to deep learning, although we collected thousands of labels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用传统机器学习和深度学习对多语言用户反馈进行分类
随着Twitter等社交媒体和应用商店等软件分发平台的兴起,用户对软件产品的表达方式多种多样。流行的软件供应商每天都能得到上千倍的用户反馈。研究表明,这样的反馈包含对软件开发团队有价值的信息,如问题报告或特性和支持查询。由于对用户反馈的人工分析繁琐且难以管理,许多研究人员和工具供应商建议使用基于传统监督机器学习方法的自动分析。在这项工作中,我们比较了传统机器学习和深度学习的结果,将英语和意大利语的用户反馈分为问题报告、查询和不相关。我们的研究结果表明,使用传统的机器学习,我们仍然可以获得与深度学习相当的结果,尽管我们收集了数千个标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CrowdRE: Achievements, Opportunities and Pitfalls When Interactive Graphic Storytelling Fails Process Mining for Cloud-Based Applications: A Systematic Literature Review Examination of Evaluation Method on Human Error During Work by Bioinstrumentation The Requirements Engineering Reference Model: A Fundamental Impediment to Using Formal Methods in Software Systems Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1