Intentionality, Qualia, and the Stream of Unconsciousness

Sam Coleman
{"title":"Intentionality, Qualia, and the Stream of Unconsciousness","authors":"Sam Coleman","doi":"10.17454/pam-2203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Brentano, mentality is essentially intentional in nature. Other philosophers have emphasized the phenomenal-qualitative aspect of conscious experiences as core to the mind. A recent philosophical wave – the ‘phenomenal intentionality programme’ – seeks to unite these conceptions in the idea that mental content is grounded in phenomenal qualities. However, a philosophical and scientific current, which includes Freud and contemporary cognitive science, makes widespread use of the posit of unconscious mentality/mental content. I aim to reconcile these disparate, influential strands of thought concerning mentality’s essence, by defending a conception of the mark of the mental as consisting in content-carrying qualitative character (or mental qualities) – but understood as properties that can exist both in conscious (i.e. phenomenal) form and unconsciously. I describe this conception, deal with major historical objections to the notions of unconscious qualitative character and mentality, and explain the virtues of construing the mark of the mental in this way.","PeriodicalId":404019,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology & Mind","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology & Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

According to Brentano, mentality is essentially intentional in nature. Other philosophers have emphasized the phenomenal-qualitative aspect of conscious experiences as core to the mind. A recent philosophical wave – the ‘phenomenal intentionality programme’ – seeks to unite these conceptions in the idea that mental content is grounded in phenomenal qualities. However, a philosophical and scientific current, which includes Freud and contemporary cognitive science, makes widespread use of the posit of unconscious mentality/mental content. I aim to reconcile these disparate, influential strands of thought concerning mentality’s essence, by defending a conception of the mark of the mental as consisting in content-carrying qualitative character (or mental qualities) – but understood as properties that can exist both in conscious (i.e. phenomenal) form and unconsciously. I describe this conception, deal with major historical objections to the notions of unconscious qualitative character and mentality, and explain the virtues of construing the mark of the mental in this way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意向性、感质和无意识流
布伦塔诺认为,心理本质上是有意识的。其他哲学家强调意识体验的现象-定性方面是心灵的核心。最近的一股哲学浪潮——“现象意向性计划”——试图将这些概念统一起来,认为心理内容是以现象性质为基础的。然而,包括弗洛伊德和当代认知科学在内的哲学和科学潮流,广泛使用了无意识心理/心理内容的假设。我的目标是调和这些不同的、有影响力的关于心理本质的思想,通过捍卫这样一个概念,即心理的标志是由带有内容的定性特征(或心理品质)组成的,但被理解为可以以有意识(即现象)形式和无意识形式存在的属性。我描述了这一概念,处理了对无意识的定性特征和心理概念的主要历史异议,并解释了以这种方式解释心理标记的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Operationalizing Disembodied Interaction: The Perceptual Crossing Experiment in schizophrenia Research Intentionality, Point of View, and the Role of the Interpreter Autistics as empathic subjects. Phenomenology and Intense World Theory Inner Awareness as a Mark of the Mental Intersubjectivity and social perception in epilepsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1