Prioritizing Public Interest: The Essence of Shibusawa's Doctrine and Its Implications for the Re-invention of Capitalism

Kazuhiro Tanaka
{"title":"Prioritizing Public Interest: The Essence of Shibusawa's Doctrine and Its Implications for the Re-invention of Capitalism","authors":"Kazuhiro Tanaka","doi":"10.15057/30972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shibusawa Eiichi, an entrepreneur in modern Japan, insisted that morality and economy are mutually inseparable, and therefore compatible. Although this doctrine of “the inseparability of morality and economy” was regarded as the hallmark philosophy of Shibusawa, he is not the only one to advocate the compatibility of morality and economics. Adam Smith and Michael Porter have made similar assertions. Closely comparing their opinions with Shibusawaʼs opinion, however, turns up some inherent differences. Similarly to Smith and Porter, Shibusawa is fully in favor of the pursuit of private profit; but unlike them, he emphasizes that business should be conducted with public interest as the intended and primary objective in itself. The very order of “public interest first, private profit second” is the essence of Shibusawaʼs doctrine. I would argue in this paper that Shibusawaʼs doctrine has a great potential in re-inventing contemporary capitalism in crisis.","PeriodicalId":154016,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/30972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shibusawa Eiichi, an entrepreneur in modern Japan, insisted that morality and economy are mutually inseparable, and therefore compatible. Although this doctrine of “the inseparability of morality and economy” was regarded as the hallmark philosophy of Shibusawa, he is not the only one to advocate the compatibility of morality and economics. Adam Smith and Michael Porter have made similar assertions. Closely comparing their opinions with Shibusawaʼs opinion, however, turns up some inherent differences. Similarly to Smith and Porter, Shibusawa is fully in favor of the pursuit of private profit; but unlike them, he emphasizes that business should be conducted with public interest as the intended and primary objective in itself. The very order of “public interest first, private profit second” is the essence of Shibusawaʼs doctrine. I would argue in this paper that Shibusawaʼs doctrine has a great potential in re-inventing contemporary capitalism in crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共利益优先:涩泽学说的本质及其对资本主义再造的启示
现代日本企业家涩泽荣一坚持认为,道德和经济是不可分割的,因此是兼容的。虽然这种“道德与经济不可分割”的学说被认为是涩泽哲学的标志,但他并不是唯一一个主张道德与经济相容的人。亚当•斯密(Adam Smith)和迈克尔•波特(Michael Porter)也做出了类似的断言。然而,将他们的观点与涩泽的观点进行比较,就会发现一些内在的差异。与史密斯和波特类似,涩泽完全赞成追求私人利益;但与他们不同的是,他强调商业活动本身应该以公众利益为主要目标。“公共利益第一,私人利益第二”的秩序正是涩泽学说的精髓所在。在本文中,我认为涩泽的学说在重塑危机中的当代资本主义方面具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Approach to Modeling on Financial Time Series Data with Regime Shifts Prioritizing Public Interest: The Essence of Shibusawa's Doctrine and Its Implications for the Re-invention of Capitalism The Cyclical Patterns of Capital Buffers: Evidence from Japanese Banks Produktions- und kostentheoretische Fundierung der Kostenrechnung der Servicefunktionen The Luxury Watches as Double-Storied Symbol System: Brand Historicity in Ahistorical China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1