Economic Status of the Elderly in the United States

V. Reno, Benjamin W. Veghte
{"title":"Economic Status of the Elderly in the United States","authors":"V. Reno, Benjamin W. Veghte","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1763870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American elders saw sharp gains in their incomes and declines in poverty during the 1960s and 70s and have had smaller gains since. Updated poverty measures show that seniors are as likely as children to be poor. When Social Security and pensions are converted to asset values, a typical household approaching retirement in 2007 had net worth of $676,500. Social Security was the largest part (44 percent) and home equity was second (20 percent). The collapse of the housing bubble and the meltdown in the stock market in 2008-2009 significantly eroded asset values. U.S. elders are more likely to be poor than are elders in other OECD countries. The United States faces a smaller challenge from an aging society because our workforce is growing and our Social Security promises are smaller. Small changes in revenues and benefits could securely pay for Social Security and improve benefit adequacy for vulnerable elders.This working paper is based on the chapter “Economic Status of the Aged,” in the Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences by R.H. Binstock and L. George (eds.), 7th Edition (Oxford: Elsevier, 2011).","PeriodicalId":306476,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Low Income Elderly (Topic)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Low Income Elderly (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1763870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

American elders saw sharp gains in their incomes and declines in poverty during the 1960s and 70s and have had smaller gains since. Updated poverty measures show that seniors are as likely as children to be poor. When Social Security and pensions are converted to asset values, a typical household approaching retirement in 2007 had net worth of $676,500. Social Security was the largest part (44 percent) and home equity was second (20 percent). The collapse of the housing bubble and the meltdown in the stock market in 2008-2009 significantly eroded asset values. U.S. elders are more likely to be poor than are elders in other OECD countries. The United States faces a smaller challenge from an aging society because our workforce is growing and our Social Security promises are smaller. Small changes in revenues and benefits could securely pay for Social Security and improve benefit adequacy for vulnerable elders.This working paper is based on the chapter “Economic Status of the Aged,” in the Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences by R.H. Binstock and L. George (eds.), 7th Edition (Oxford: Elsevier, 2011).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国老年人的经济地位
在20世纪60年代和70年代,美国老年人的收入大幅增加,贫困人口减少,但此后的增长幅度较小。最新的贫困指标显示,老年人和儿童一样容易陷入贫困。当社会保障和养老金转换成资产价值时,2007年一个接近退休的典型家庭的净资产为676,500美元。社会保障是最大的一部分(44%),房屋净值是第二部分(20%)。2008-2009年房地产泡沫的破裂和股市的崩盘严重侵蚀了资产价值。美国的老年人比其他经合组织国家的老年人更有可能贫穷。美国面临的老龄化社会的挑战较小,因为我们的劳动力在增长,我们的社会保障承诺在缩小。收入和福利的微小变化可以安全地支付社会保障,并改善弱势老年人的福利充分性。本工作论文基于R.H. Binstock和L. George(编)的《老龄化与社会科学手册》第7版(牛津:爱思唯尔,2011年)中的“老年人的经济地位”章节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Характеристики на социалните дейности и политики (The Characteristics of Social Activities and Policies) Labor Force Participation of the Elderly in Japan Job Polarization and Labor Market Outcomes for Older, Middle-Skilled Workers Legal Protection of Elderly Persons in India Economic Status of the Elderly in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1