AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION TYPES OF DEAF STUDENTS WITH ENVIRONMENT

Cipta Rizqi Rahmah, A. Kholiq
{"title":"AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION TYPES OF DEAF STUDENTS WITH ENVIRONMENT","authors":"Cipta Rizqi Rahmah, A. Kholiq","doi":"10.33394/JO-ELT.V5I2.2304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aimed to analysis (1) the deaf student communicate with the deaf student; (2) with other disability; and (3) with normal people. This research used a qualitative approach. The sources of data are focusing on the communication types of deaf students by three deaf people SMALB Banjarmendalan Lamongan academic year 2016/2017. Data Collection Techniques are interview; observation; and documentation. Research Instruments in this study are a notebook to write about the interview; checklist paper; and field note. Analyzing technique in this study are organizing, coding and reducing, interpreting and representing. The result of this study are  Deaf children's communication with deaf children is more dominant using nonverbal rather than verbal. Use of continuous verbal communication such as Kinect (facial expression, eye contact, sign language), haptics, paralanguage, and proxemict. Deaf children communicate with other disability (down syndrome) is Deaf children's communication with dominant down syndrome children using nonverbal communication types. The use of intense verbal communication such as kinestict (facial expressions, eye contact, sign language) and haptics are two very important aspects of their communication. Deaf children's communication with normal people uses a combination of verbal (oral and writing) and nonverbal (kinect, haptic, and proxemic). Teachers will use a clear combination of sign language and oral. While researchers use oral, written and sign language to make it easier for deaf students to understand the conversation.","PeriodicalId":125733,"journal":{"name":"Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/JO-ELT.V5I2.2304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The research aimed to analysis (1) the deaf student communicate with the deaf student; (2) with other disability; and (3) with normal people. This research used a qualitative approach. The sources of data are focusing on the communication types of deaf students by three deaf people SMALB Banjarmendalan Lamongan academic year 2016/2017. Data Collection Techniques are interview; observation; and documentation. Research Instruments in this study are a notebook to write about the interview; checklist paper; and field note. Analyzing technique in this study are organizing, coding and reducing, interpreting and representing. The result of this study are  Deaf children's communication with deaf children is more dominant using nonverbal rather than verbal. Use of continuous verbal communication such as Kinect (facial expression, eye contact, sign language), haptics, paralanguage, and proxemict. Deaf children communicate with other disability (down syndrome) is Deaf children's communication with dominant down syndrome children using nonverbal communication types. The use of intense verbal communication such as kinestict (facial expressions, eye contact, sign language) and haptics are two very important aspects of their communication. Deaf children's communication with normal people uses a combination of verbal (oral and writing) and nonverbal (kinect, haptic, and proxemic). Teachers will use a clear combination of sign language and oral. While researchers use oral, written and sign language to make it easier for deaf students to understand the conversation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聋哑学生与环境的交流类型分析
本研究旨在分析(1)聋哑学生与聋哑学生的交流;(二)有其他残疾的;(3)正常人。这项研究采用了定性方法。数据来源集中在2016/2017学年三个聋人smallb Banjarmendalan Lamongan的聋人学生的交流类型。数据收集技术为访谈;观察;和文档。本研究的研究工具为笔记本,用于记录访谈内容;检查表纸;还有现场记录。本研究的分析技巧包括组织、编码与还原、解释与再现。本研究结果表明,聋儿与聋儿之间的交流主要是使用非语言而非语言。使用持续的语言交流,如Kinect(面部表情、眼神交流、手语)、触觉学、辅助语言和肢体语言。聋儿与其他残疾(唐氏综合症)的交流是聋儿与显性唐氏综合症儿童使用的非语言交流类型。使用强烈的语言交流,如动态性(面部表情,眼神交流,手语)和触觉是他们交流的两个非常重要的方面。聋儿与正常人的交流使用语言(口头和书面)和非语言(kinect,触觉和邻近)的结合。教师将使用手语和口语的明确结合。研究人员使用口语、书面语和手语,让聋哑学生更容易理解对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Implementation of Literacy Culture Programs in Elementary School Investigating the Implementation of Classroom Assessment by Novice English Teachers The English Speaking Competency and Challenges for BIPA Teachers Project-Based Learning for Mechanical Engineering Students in the Emergency Remote Teaching Square Talks®: A Mobile App to Support EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1