An Investigation of Academic Reading Strategies among Thai Economics Students

Prathomwat Suraprajit
{"title":"An Investigation of Academic Reading Strategies among Thai Economics Students","authors":"Prathomwat Suraprajit","doi":"10.30845/ijll.v6n3p12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading is one of the most important skills for language learners. Therefore, the reading strategies play a vital role for comprehending their reading tasks. The present study then investigated the reading strategies employed by Thai university students towards academic reading. The questionnaire, which based on the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (Oxford, 1990), and semi-structure interview were conducted for collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. The collected data then were analysed by using the descriptive statistics. Classified by category, the findings from the questionnaire indicated that affective strategies was rated at the most used strategy, whereas social strategies was reported the least use. Moreover, grouped by strategy, the highest used strategies was cognitive strategies, whereas social strategies was at the least level. In addition, the results from interviewing stated that scanning (cognitive strategies) was the most employed strategy, whereas reading a passage only one time with no focus was the least used. Moreover, summarizing (cognitive strategies) was the most useful strategy reported by the participants, while reading slowly with no focus was the useless technique for most of them. A further study should explore the relationship between the use of reading strategies and the perception towards the useful strategies.","PeriodicalId":409958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v6n3p12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reading is one of the most important skills for language learners. Therefore, the reading strategies play a vital role for comprehending their reading tasks. The present study then investigated the reading strategies employed by Thai university students towards academic reading. The questionnaire, which based on the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (Oxford, 1990), and semi-structure interview were conducted for collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. The collected data then were analysed by using the descriptive statistics. Classified by category, the findings from the questionnaire indicated that affective strategies was rated at the most used strategy, whereas social strategies was reported the least use. Moreover, grouped by strategy, the highest used strategies was cognitive strategies, whereas social strategies was at the least level. In addition, the results from interviewing stated that scanning (cognitive strategies) was the most employed strategy, whereas reading a passage only one time with no focus was the least used. Moreover, summarizing (cognitive strategies) was the most useful strategy reported by the participants, while reading slowly with no focus was the useless technique for most of them. A further study should explore the relationship between the use of reading strategies and the perception towards the useful strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国经济学专业学生学术阅读策略调查
阅读是语言学习者最重要的技能之一。因此,阅读策略对理解学生的阅读任务起着至关重要的作用。本研究随后调查了泰国大学生在学术阅读中所采用的阅读策略。采用基于《语言学习策略量表》(牛津,1990)的问卷调查和半结构访谈,收集定量和定性数据。然后用描述性统计对收集到的数据进行分析。按类别分类,问卷调查结果表明,情感策略被评为使用最多的策略,而社交策略被报道使用最少。此外,按策略分组,使用最多的策略是认知策略,而使用最少的策略是社交策略。此外,访谈的结果表明,浏览(认知策略)是最常用的策略,而只阅读一遍没有重点的文章是最不常用的策略。此外,总结(认知策略)是参与者报告的最有用的策略,而对大多数人来说,没有重点的缓慢阅读是无用的技巧。进一步的研究应该探讨阅读策略的使用与对有用策略的感知之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Word Association Responses in L1 and L2 to the Chinese Word Yueliang (Moon): Implications for L2 Vocabulary Instruction Language Maintenance among Minority Languages with Special Reference to Leya Language of Chief Mukuni, Southern Province Kenya Airways Dominant Image Restoration Strategies during the 2015/16 Financial Crisis Students' Grammatical Errors as Corrected by English Teachers at Secondary Schools in Sudan Teacher Supervision Program to Enhance Teacher’s Learning to Teach Glocal Englishes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1