Rape and evolution: A Reply to our critics

R. Thornhill, C. Palmer
{"title":"Rape and evolution: A Reply to our critics","authors":"R. Thornhill, C. Palmer","doi":"10.1080/14616661.2002.10383129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the last quarter of a century, attempts to prevent rape have been guided by a widespread social-science explanation that holds that rape’s causation has little, if anything, to do with sexual desire. Instead, it holds that rape is motivated by men’s attempt to dominate and control women. It also contends that rape occurs only when males are taught (by their culture) to rape. In A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion (MIT Press, 2000), we scientifically criticize this social-constructionist view of rape. We argue that, although a given rapist may have numerous motivations for committing a rape, social constructionists have not seriously and honestly considered the vast evidence showing that rapists are sexually motivated. Although we agree that culture (that is, social learning, or learning resulting from experience with other members of the same species) plays a significant role in causing rape, we challenge the notion that rape occurs only when males are taught by their culture to rape. The ethnographic record of anthropology indicates that rape occurs in all known cultures. It also occurs in a wide variety of other species in which there is certainly no cultural encouragement of such behavior. We emphasize in our book that the best way to obtain a better understanding of the role of culture in human rape is to approach the subject from the only generally accepted scientific explanation of the behavior of living things: evolution by natural selection. We then show that rape is definitely caused by men’s evolved sexual psychology, and we discuss why this knowledge may be important to society’s efforts to reduce rape.","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616661.2002.10383129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

For the last quarter of a century, attempts to prevent rape have been guided by a widespread social-science explanation that holds that rape’s causation has little, if anything, to do with sexual desire. Instead, it holds that rape is motivated by men’s attempt to dominate and control women. It also contends that rape occurs only when males are taught (by their culture) to rape. In A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion (MIT Press, 2000), we scientifically criticize this social-constructionist view of rape. We argue that, although a given rapist may have numerous motivations for committing a rape, social constructionists have not seriously and honestly considered the vast evidence showing that rapists are sexually motivated. Although we agree that culture (that is, social learning, or learning resulting from experience with other members of the same species) plays a significant role in causing rape, we challenge the notion that rape occurs only when males are taught by their culture to rape. The ethnographic record of anthropology indicates that rape occurs in all known cultures. It also occurs in a wide variety of other species in which there is certainly no cultural encouragement of such behavior. We emphasize in our book that the best way to obtain a better understanding of the role of culture in human rape is to approach the subject from the only generally accepted scientific explanation of the behavior of living things: evolution by natural selection. We then show that rape is definitely caused by men’s evolved sexual psychology, and we discuss why this knowledge may be important to society’s efforts to reduce rape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强奸和进化:对我们批评者的回复
在过去的四分之一个世纪里,防止强奸的努力一直受到一种广泛的社会科学解释的指导,这种解释认为,强奸的因果关系与性欲几乎没有关系。相反,它认为强奸的动机是男性试图支配和控制女性。它还认为,只有当男性被(他们的文化)教导去强奸时,强奸才会发生。在《强奸的自然史:性胁迫的生物学基础》(麻省理工学院出版社,2000)一书中,我们科学地批判了这种社会建构主义的强奸观。我们认为,尽管一个特定的强奸犯可能有许多实施强奸的动机,但社会建构主义者并没有认真和诚实地考虑显示强奸犯有性动机的大量证据。虽然我们同意文化(即社会学习,或从同一物种的其他成员那里获得的经验)在导致强奸中起着重要作用,但我们质疑强奸只发生在男性被其文化教导时的观念。人类学的民族志记录表明,强奸发生在所有已知的文化中。这种行为也发生在许多其他物种中,这些物种当然没有文化鼓励这种行为。我们在书中强调,要更好地理解文化在人类强奸中的作用,最好的方法是从对生物行为唯一被普遍接受的科学解释——自然选择的进化——来探讨这个问题。然后,我们表明强奸绝对是由男性进化的性心理引起的,我们讨论了为什么这一知识可能对社会减少强奸的努力很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rape and evolution: A Reply to our critics Perceptions of sexual harassment: An evolutionary perspective A defence of evolutionary psychology: Reply to Gannon THE ACCEPTABLE FACE OF PARENTHOOD: THE RELATIVE STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INTERPRETATIONS OF OFFSPRING IN INFERTILITY TREATMENT Etiology of male sexual orientation in an Australian twin sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1