The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Investment Recommendations: Analysts’ Perceptions and Shifting Institutional Logics

I. Ioannou, George Serafeim
{"title":"The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Investment Recommendations: Analysts’ Perceptions and Shifting Institutional Logics","authors":"I. Ioannou, George Serafeim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1507874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"type=\"main\" xml:id=\"smj2268-abs-0001\"> We explore the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) ratings on sell-side analysts' assessments of firms' future financial performance. We suggest that when analysts perceive CSR as an agency cost they produce pessimistic recommendations for firms with high CSR ratings. Moreover, we theorize that, over time, the emergence of a stakeholder focus shifts the analysts' perceptions of CSR. Using a large sample of publicly traded U.S. firms over 15 years, we confirm that, in the early 1990s, analysts issue more pessimistic recommendations for firms with high CSR ratings. However, analysts progressively assess these firms more optimistically over time. Furthermore, we find that analysts of highest status are the first to shift the relation between CSR ratings and investment recommendation optimism . Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":219371,"journal":{"name":"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"640","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1507874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 640

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="smj2268-abs-0001"> We explore the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) ratings on sell-side analysts' assessments of firms' future financial performance. We suggest that when analysts perceive CSR as an agency cost they produce pessimistic recommendations for firms with high CSR ratings. Moreover, we theorize that, over time, the emergence of a stakeholder focus shifts the analysts' perceptions of CSR. Using a large sample of publicly traded U.S. firms over 15 years, we confirm that, in the early 1990s, analysts issue more pessimistic recommendations for firms with high CSR ratings. However, analysts progressively assess these firms more optimistically over time. Furthermore, we find that analysts of highest status are the first to shift the relation between CSR ratings and investment recommendation optimism . Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社会责任对投资建议的影响:分析师的看法和制度逻辑的转变
type="main" xml:id="smj2268-abs-0001">我们探讨了企业社会责任(CSR)评级对卖方分析师对企业未来财务业绩评估的影响。我们认为,当分析师将企业社会责任视为一种代理成本时,他们会对企业社会责任评级高的公司提出悲观的建议。此外,我们的理论认为,随着时间的推移,利益相关者焦点的出现改变了分析师对企业社会责任的看法。通过对超过15年的美国上市公司的大量样本,我们证实,在20世纪90年代初,分析师对CSR评级高的公司给出了更为悲观的建议。然而,随着时间的推移,分析师对这些公司的评估逐渐变得更加乐观。此外,我们发现地位最高的分析师首先改变了企业社会责任评级与投资建议乐观度之间的关系。版权所有©2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Investment Recommendations: Analysts’ Perceptions and Shifting Institutional Logics Optimal Management of an Ecosystem with an Unknown Threshold Carbon Offset Provision with Guilt-Ridden Consumers Stochastic Income Statement Planning and Emissions Trading An Analysis of Tourists’ Expenditure of Winter Sport Events through Tobit Censorate Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1