Evaluation and improvement of the higher education system

L. Zhou, Zhizheng Lai
{"title":"Evaluation and improvement of the higher education system","authors":"L. Zhou, Zhizheng Lai","doi":"10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For any country, the higher education system not only plays an industrial role, but also sends a large number of talents to the country's development. This article is based on this, establishing an evaluation model of the higher education system and formulating an improvement policy. Question one requires us to establish a system that can assess the health of any country's higher education system. We select the gross enrollment rate, the proportion of people receiving higher education, the proportion of higher education expenditure in fiscal expenditure, and the proportion of international students to measure the health of the higher education system. Because each indicator has different impacts, that is, the weight is different, we first use the analytic hierarchy process to calculate the weight of each indicator, then use the TOPSIS method to build an evaluation model, combine the weights, calculate the scores of each country, and determine their health status in turn. Question two requires us to apply the model. We chose the data of the United States, Germany, Japan, Australia, and China to analyze and calculate the score. Since China has the lowest score, we selected China as our improvement target. Finally, we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of this model, and the model can be improved through the disadvantages.","PeriodicalId":293852,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of New Developments in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of New Developments in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For any country, the higher education system not only plays an industrial role, but also sends a large number of talents to the country's development. This article is based on this, establishing an evaluation model of the higher education system and formulating an improvement policy. Question one requires us to establish a system that can assess the health of any country's higher education system. We select the gross enrollment rate, the proportion of people receiving higher education, the proportion of higher education expenditure in fiscal expenditure, and the proportion of international students to measure the health of the higher education system. Because each indicator has different impacts, that is, the weight is different, we first use the analytic hierarchy process to calculate the weight of each indicator, then use the TOPSIS method to build an evaluation model, combine the weights, calculate the scores of each country, and determine their health status in turn. Question two requires us to apply the model. We chose the data of the United States, Germany, Japan, Australia, and China to analyze and calculate the score. Since China has the lowest score, we selected China as our improvement target. Finally, we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of this model, and the model can be improved through the disadvantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育体系的评价与完善
对于任何一个国家来说,高等教育系统不仅扮演着产业角色,而且为国家的发展输送了大量的人才。本文在此基础上,建立了高等教育系统评价模型,并制定了改进策略。问题一要求我们建立一个能够评估任何国家高等教育体系健康状况的体系。我们选择毛入学率、接受高等教育的人口比例、高等教育支出占财政支出的比例、留学生比例来衡量高等教育体系的健康程度。由于每个指标的影响程度不同,即权重不同,我们首先采用层次分析法计算出各个指标的权重,然后采用TOPSIS法构建评价模型,将权重组合,计算出各个国家的得分,依次确定其健康状况。问题二要求我们应用这个模型。我们选择了美国、德国、日本、澳大利亚和中国的数据来分析和计算分数。由于中国的得分最低,所以我们选择了中国作为我们的改进目标。最后,我们总结了该模型的优点和缺点,并通过缺点对模型进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploration of innovative and entrepreneurship Teaching Mode in Application-oriented Universities School-enterprise cooperation, innovation, entrepreneurial education management model Research on English Flipped Classroom in Higher Vocational Colleges Based on OBE Concept Tightened Regulations on Education Industry in China: Reasons, Challenges, and Solutions A Comparative Study of Chinese, American and European Foreign Language Education Policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1