Fixation and Confusion: Investigating Eye-tracking Participants' Exposure to Information in Personas

Joni O. Salminen, B. Jansen, Jisun An, Soon-Gyo Jung, Lene Nielsen, Haewoon Kwak
{"title":"Fixation and Confusion: Investigating Eye-tracking Participants' Exposure to Information in Personas","authors":"Joni O. Salminen, B. Jansen, Jisun An, Soon-Gyo Jung, Lene Nielsen, Haewoon Kwak","doi":"10.1145/3176349.3176391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To more effectively convey relevant information to end users of persona profiles, we conducted a user study consisting of 29 participants engaging with three persona layout treatments. We were interested in confusion engendered by the treatments on the participants, and conducted a within-subjects study in the actual work environment, using eye-tracking and talk-aloud data collection. We coded the verbal data into classes of informativeness and confusion and correlated it with fixations and durations on the Areas of Interests recorded by the eye-tracking device. We used various analysis techniques, including Mann-Whitney, regression, and Levenshtein distance, to investigate how confused users differed from non-confused users, what information of the personas caused confusion, and what were the predictors of confusion of end users of personas. We consolidate our various findings into a confusion ratio measure, which highlights in a succinct manner the most confusing elements of the personas. Findings show that inconsistencies among the informational elements of the persona generate the most confusion, especially with the elements of images and social media quotes. The research has implications for the design of personas and related information products, such as user profiling and customer segmentation.","PeriodicalId":198379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

To more effectively convey relevant information to end users of persona profiles, we conducted a user study consisting of 29 participants engaging with three persona layout treatments. We were interested in confusion engendered by the treatments on the participants, and conducted a within-subjects study in the actual work environment, using eye-tracking and talk-aloud data collection. We coded the verbal data into classes of informativeness and confusion and correlated it with fixations and durations on the Areas of Interests recorded by the eye-tracking device. We used various analysis techniques, including Mann-Whitney, regression, and Levenshtein distance, to investigate how confused users differed from non-confused users, what information of the personas caused confusion, and what were the predictors of confusion of end users of personas. We consolidate our various findings into a confusion ratio measure, which highlights in a succinct manner the most confusing elements of the personas. Findings show that inconsistencies among the informational elements of the persona generate the most confusion, especially with the elements of images and social media quotes. The research has implications for the design of personas and related information products, such as user profiling and customer segmentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注视与困惑:调查眼动追踪参与者在人物角色中的信息暴露
为了更有效地向角色配置文件的最终用户传达相关信息,我们进行了一项由29名参与者组成的用户研究,他们参与了三种角色布局处理。我们对参与者因治疗而产生的困惑感兴趣,并在实际工作环境中进行了一项受试者内研究,使用眼球追踪和大声说话的数据收集。我们将口头数据按信息量和混乱程度进行编码,并将其与眼球追踪设备记录的兴趣区域的注视和持续时间相关联。我们使用了各种分析技术,包括Mann-Whitney、回归和Levenshtein距离,来调查困惑的用户与未困惑的用户有何不同,角色的哪些信息导致了困惑,以及角色的最终用户的困惑的预测因素是什么。我们将各种发现整合到一个混淆比率测量中,以简洁的方式突出人物角色中最令人困惑的元素。研究结果表明,人物角色信息元素之间的不一致最容易引起混淆,尤其是图片和社交媒体引用元素。该研究对人物角色和相关信息产品的设计具有启示意义,例如用户分析和客户细分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distant Voices in the Dark: Understanding the Incongruent Information Needs of Fiction Authors and Readers Visualizing and Exploring Scientific Literature with CiteSpace: An Introduction What Sources to Rely on:: Laypeople's Source Selection in Online Health Information Seeking Investigating Everyday Information Behavior of Using Ambient Displays: A Case of Indoor Air Quality Monitors Collaborative Information Seeking through Social Media Updates in Real-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1