Weizenbaum’s nightmare: The decay of language in AI-generated communication

A. McIntyre
{"title":"Weizenbaum’s nightmare: The decay of language in AI-generated communication","authors":"A. McIntyre","doi":"10.1386/jpm_00002_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Half a century on from the ELIZA program, with the rapid and widespread emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) programs, we are now on the cusp of realizing Joseph Weizenbaum’s nightmare: an absurd world that is not only populated by machines that can convincingly simulate human communication in its various forms (e.g. writing, visual art, performance and music) but in which these machines are readily accepted as authentic replacements. Drawing on the existentialist language philosophy of Vilém Flusser, this article argues that to defer cultural communication to generative AI programs is to step outside the ‘great conversation’ of human culture and to be condemned to an unutterable nothingness. To demonstrate this, I analyse several illustrative examples including Google’s Language Model for Dialogue Applications (LaMDA) language model, the text-based roleplaying game AI Dungeon (Latitude 2019), and the art installation UUmwelt (Huyghe 2018). I argue that generative AI programs only appear to ‘speak’ in a language we understand while continuing to ‘think’ in the formal language of mathematics and that their communications are merely transliterations of numbers. As such, these programs are not bound by the same moral and syntactical rules that we observe and abide by in cultural communication, and in using generative AI programs, we may very well bypass these rules to express raw intention. Though mechanized in the form of technical images, such a mode of expression would be akin to the nonsensical cries of animals in that it fulfils a fundamental desire but reveals nothing of a consciousness within. By deferring the labour of communication to an AI program, the human retreats inward and disappears from culture as they ‘speak’ in one language but ‘think’ in another. Thus, the nightmarish future that Weizenbaum envisioned is one filled with illusions of artistic expression, projected by both machines and humans, and yet there is no evidence of humanity in such a culture.","PeriodicalId":409937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pervasive Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pervasive Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jpm_00002_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Half a century on from the ELIZA program, with the rapid and widespread emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) programs, we are now on the cusp of realizing Joseph Weizenbaum’s nightmare: an absurd world that is not only populated by machines that can convincingly simulate human communication in its various forms (e.g. writing, visual art, performance and music) but in which these machines are readily accepted as authentic replacements. Drawing on the existentialist language philosophy of Vilém Flusser, this article argues that to defer cultural communication to generative AI programs is to step outside the ‘great conversation’ of human culture and to be condemned to an unutterable nothingness. To demonstrate this, I analyse several illustrative examples including Google’s Language Model for Dialogue Applications (LaMDA) language model, the text-based roleplaying game AI Dungeon (Latitude 2019), and the art installation UUmwelt (Huyghe 2018). I argue that generative AI programs only appear to ‘speak’ in a language we understand while continuing to ‘think’ in the formal language of mathematics and that their communications are merely transliterations of numbers. As such, these programs are not bound by the same moral and syntactical rules that we observe and abide by in cultural communication, and in using generative AI programs, we may very well bypass these rules to express raw intention. Though mechanized in the form of technical images, such a mode of expression would be akin to the nonsensical cries of animals in that it fulfils a fundamental desire but reveals nothing of a consciousness within. By deferring the labour of communication to an AI program, the human retreats inward and disappears from culture as they ‘speak’ in one language but ‘think’ in another. Thus, the nightmarish future that Weizenbaum envisioned is one filled with illusions of artistic expression, projected by both machines and humans, and yet there is no evidence of humanity in such a culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weizenbaum的噩梦:人工智能产生的交流中语言的衰落
半个世纪以来,随着生成式人工智能(AI)程序的迅速和广泛出现,我们现在正处于实现约瑟夫·魏岑鲍姆(Joseph Weizenbaum)噩梦的边缘:一个荒谬的世界,不仅充斥着能够以各种形式(如写作、视觉艺术、表演和音乐)令人信服地模拟人类交流的机器,而且这些机器很容易被接受为真正的替代品。借鉴维尔姆·弗卢瑟的存在主义语言哲学,本文认为,将文化交流推迟到生成式人工智能程序是走出了人类文化的“伟大对话”,并被谴责为不可言说的虚无。为了证明这一点,我分析了几个说导性的例子,包括谷歌的对话应用语言模型(LaMDA)语言模型、基于文本的角色扮演游戏AI Dungeon (Latitude 2019)和艺术装置UUmwelt (Huyghe 2018)。我认为,生成式人工智能程序似乎只是在用我们理解的语言“说话”,同时继续用数学的形式语言“思考”,它们的交流仅仅是数字的音译。因此,这些程序不受我们在文化交流中所遵守的道德和句法规则的约束,在使用生成式人工智能程序时,我们很可能绕过这些规则来表达原始意图。虽然以技术图像的形式机械化,但这种表达方式类似于动物的荒谬叫声,因为它满足了基本的欲望,但没有揭示任何内在的意识。通过将交流的工作交给人工智能程序,人类向内撤退,从文化中消失,因为他们用一种语言“说话”,但用另一种语言“思考”。因此,Weizenbaum所设想的噩梦般的未来充满了艺术表达的幻觉,由机器和人类共同投射,然而在这样的文化中没有人性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The future of advertising campaigns: The role of AI-generated images in advertising creative Threaded Edition 21: Exploring Māori creation narratives with augmented reality-animated sonic experiences in publication design The dragon’s AR: Narrative augmentation in Russell’s The Dragon Defenders The NEFFIE project: Technological innovation, artistic co-creation and social augmented experience Recurring patterns: An ethnographic study on the adoption of AI music tools by practitioners of electroacoustic, contemporary and popular musics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1