Influence of tissue non-homogeneities on the accuracy of 3-D dose distribution monitoring during gamma-ray radiotherapy

M. Miklavec, D. Savran, S. Širca, M. Vencelj
{"title":"Influence of tissue non-homogeneities on the accuracy of 3-D dose distribution monitoring during gamma-ray radiotherapy","authors":"M. Miklavec, D. Savran, S. Širca, M. Vencelj","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2016.8069540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delivering precisely the desired dose distribution to the patient during radiotherapy is of crucial importance for treatment success and monitoring the actual distributed dose opens the possibility to correct for deposition inaccuracies and thus achieve better conformance to the treatment plan. Positron emission tomography has already been successfully used to measure the residual radioactivity from (γ, n) reactions in the patient after the treatment with hadron therapy or high-energy gamma-ray radiotherapy (above ∼20 MV) [1], [2]. When trying to use a similar approach for gamma-rays of lower energies (most commonly 6 to 18 MV) the only source of positrons is prompt pair production in the beam, calling for measurements while the linac is operating and saturating the detector. The problems with saturation were alleviated to a formidable extent by using advanced digital processing techniques to measure energies of incident particles at rates beyond 10 Mcps per each scintillation crystal. The approach suggested by [3] builds on the discovery that there is a strong correlation between the delivered dose and the density of pair production. Our research confirmed the findings, but only as long as homogeneous objects were involved. In an inhomogeneous object, the annihilation density was no longer proportional to the dose, but rather to the density of deposited energy. This means that the intimate knowledge of the material density is required for proper reconstruction of the dose field image from the PET measurement. Additionally, one gets 2–4 mm thick regions at material boundaries where the charge particle equilibrium gets broken and the correlation no longer holds. This is, in principle, possible to account for based on ct data that is always available in such cases, but definitely calls for further work.","PeriodicalId":184587,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2016.8069540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delivering precisely the desired dose distribution to the patient during radiotherapy is of crucial importance for treatment success and monitoring the actual distributed dose opens the possibility to correct for deposition inaccuracies and thus achieve better conformance to the treatment plan. Positron emission tomography has already been successfully used to measure the residual radioactivity from (γ, n) reactions in the patient after the treatment with hadron therapy or high-energy gamma-ray radiotherapy (above ∼20 MV) [1], [2]. When trying to use a similar approach for gamma-rays of lower energies (most commonly 6 to 18 MV) the only source of positrons is prompt pair production in the beam, calling for measurements while the linac is operating and saturating the detector. The problems with saturation were alleviated to a formidable extent by using advanced digital processing techniques to measure energies of incident particles at rates beyond 10 Mcps per each scintillation crystal. The approach suggested by [3] builds on the discovery that there is a strong correlation between the delivered dose and the density of pair production. Our research confirmed the findings, but only as long as homogeneous objects were involved. In an inhomogeneous object, the annihilation density was no longer proportional to the dose, but rather to the density of deposited energy. This means that the intimate knowledge of the material density is required for proper reconstruction of the dose field image from the PET measurement. Additionally, one gets 2–4 mm thick regions at material boundaries where the charge particle equilibrium gets broken and the correlation no longer holds. This is, in principle, possible to account for based on ct data that is always available in such cases, but definitely calls for further work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织非均匀性对γ射线放射治疗中三维剂量分布监测准确性的影响
在放疗过程中准确地向患者提供所需的剂量分布对治疗成功至关重要,监测实际分布的剂量为纠正沉积不准确提供了可能,从而更好地符合治疗计划。正电子发射断层扫描已经成功地用于测量患者在接受强子治疗或高能伽马射线放射治疗(高于~ 20 MV)后(γ, n)反应的残余放射性[1],[2]。当试图使用类似的方法对能量较低的伽马射线(最常见的是6到18 MV)时,正电子的唯一来源是光束中的提示对产生,要求在直线加速器运行和使探测器饱和时进行测量。利用先进的数字处理技术,以每个闪烁晶体超过10 Mcps的速率测量入射粒子的能量,极大地缓解了饱和问题。[3]提出的方法是建立在发现递送剂量与成对产生密度之间存在很强的相关性的基础上的。我们的研究证实了这些发现,但前提是涉及到同质物体。在非均匀物体中,湮灭密度不再与剂量成正比,而是与沉积能量的密度成正比。这意味着,要从PET测量中正确重建剂量场图像,需要对材料密度有深入的了解。此外,在材料边界处有2-4毫米厚的区域,在那里电荷粒子平衡被打破,相关性不再成立。原则上,这是可以根据ct数据来解释的,在这种情况下,ct数据总是可用的,但肯定需要进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of flexible, scalable, low cost readout for beam tests of the high granularity calorimeter for the CMS endcap Latest frontier technology and design of the ATLAS calorimeter trigger board dedicated to jet identification for the LHC run 3 The ATLAS tile calorimeter DCS for run 2 The phase-II ATLAS pixel tracker upgrade: Layout and mechanics Null-hypothesis testing using distance metrics for verification of arms-control treaties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1