Learning from Food Laws in Nova Scotia

Rachel B. Herrmann
{"title":"Learning from Food Laws in Nova Scotia","authors":"Rachel B. Herrmann","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses black hunger in Nova Scotia. When white Loyalists fled the mainland American colonies, they transported ideas about hunger prevention with them. As refugee colonists, they advocated for food aid based on their knowledge of previous colonization efforts. In Nova Scotia, they blocked black colonists' access to land while taking more of it for themselves, and they enacted food laws to avoid famine. Their actions became a way to fight white hunger while ignoring—and sometimes creating—black hunger. Because white Loyalists interfered with black people's food choices while keeping them from obtaining land, their actions in Nova Scotia can be characterized as victual imperialism. These food laws were so consequential because they stopped black colonists from producing and obtaining edible commodities using the methods that had previously worked in land-scarce environments. Ultimately, black hunger was a product of several factors: inadequate planning prior to migrants' arrival in the province, land dearth, distance from food-aid distribution centers, unfavorable weather, and, finally, the introduction of laws controlling bread production, fish harvesting, and marketing practices.","PeriodicalId":311322,"journal":{"name":"No Useless Mouth","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No Useless Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter addresses black hunger in Nova Scotia. When white Loyalists fled the mainland American colonies, they transported ideas about hunger prevention with them. As refugee colonists, they advocated for food aid based on their knowledge of previous colonization efforts. In Nova Scotia, they blocked black colonists' access to land while taking more of it for themselves, and they enacted food laws to avoid famine. Their actions became a way to fight white hunger while ignoring—and sometimes creating—black hunger. Because white Loyalists interfered with black people's food choices while keeping them from obtaining land, their actions in Nova Scotia can be characterized as victual imperialism. These food laws were so consequential because they stopped black colonists from producing and obtaining edible commodities using the methods that had previously worked in land-scarce environments. Ultimately, black hunger was a product of several factors: inadequate planning prior to migrants' arrival in the province, land dearth, distance from food-aid distribution centers, unfavorable weather, and, finally, the introduction of laws controlling bread production, fish harvesting, and marketing practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从新斯科舍省的食品法中学习
本章论述了新斯科舍省黑人的饥饿问题。当白人保皇派逃离美国大陆殖民地时,他们带来了预防饥饿的思想。作为难民殖民者,他们根据对以前殖民努力的了解,主张粮食援助。在新斯科舍省,他们阻止黑人殖民者进入土地,同时自己占有更多的土地,他们制定了食品法以避免饥荒。他们的行动成为对抗白人饥饿的一种方式,同时忽视——有时甚至制造——黑人饥饿。因为白人保皇党干涉黑人的食物选择,阻止他们获得土地,他们在新斯科舍省的行为可以被描述为食物帝国主义。这些食品法是如此重要,因为它们阻止了黑人殖民者使用以前在土地稀缺的环境中有效的方法生产和获取可食用商品。最终,黑人饥饿是几个因素的产物:在移民到达该省之前规划不足,土地缺乏,距离食品援助分发中心很远,不利的天气,最后,引入控制面包生产,鱼类捕捞和营销实践的法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5. Fighting Hunger, Fearing Violence after the Revolutionary War 4. Black Victual Warriors and Hunger Creation 1. Hunger, Accommodation, and Violence in Colonial America Victual Imperialism and U.S. Indian Policy Conclusion: Why Native and Black Revolutionaries Lost the Fight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1