Rishabh Vallabh Varsha Haria, Sahar Mahdie Klim Al Zaidawi, S. Maneth
{"title":"Predicting Gender via Eye Movements","authors":"Rishabh Vallabh Varsha Haria, Sahar Mahdie Klim Al Zaidawi, S. Maneth","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2206.07442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we report the first stable results on gender prediction via eye movements. We use a dataset with images of faces as stimuli and with a large number of 370 participants. Stability has two meanings for us: first that we are able to estimate the standard deviation (SD) of a single prediction experiment (it is around 4.1 %); this is achieved by varying the number of participants. And second, we are able to provide a mean accuracy with a very low standard error (SEM): our accuracy is 65.2 %, and the SEM is 0.80 %; this is achieved through many runs of randomly selecting training and test sets for the prediction. Our study shows that two particular classifiers achieve the best accuracies: Random Forests and Logistic Regression. Our results reconfirm previous findings that females are more biased towards the left eyes of the stimuli.","PeriodicalId":129626,"journal":{"name":"Interacción","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interacción","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we report the first stable results on gender prediction via eye movements. We use a dataset with images of faces as stimuli and with a large number of 370 participants. Stability has two meanings for us: first that we are able to estimate the standard deviation (SD) of a single prediction experiment (it is around 4.1 %); this is achieved by varying the number of participants. And second, we are able to provide a mean accuracy with a very low standard error (SEM): our accuracy is 65.2 %, and the SEM is 0.80 %; this is achieved through many runs of randomly selecting training and test sets for the prediction. Our study shows that two particular classifiers achieve the best accuracies: Random Forests and Logistic Regression. Our results reconfirm previous findings that females are more biased towards the left eyes of the stimuli.