A atualidade do anti-humanismo teórico: Luhmann e Althusser frente à problemática da diferenciação/integração social

Lucas Trindade da Silva, Edemilson Paraná, Alexandre Marinho Pimenta
{"title":"A atualidade do anti-humanismo teórico: Luhmann e Althusser frente à problemática da diferenciação/integração social","authors":"Lucas Trindade da Silva, Edemilson Paraná, Alexandre Marinho Pimenta","doi":"10.5433/2176-6665.2017V22N1P270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a reflection on the currentness of theoretical anti-humanism as a problem for contemporary social thought, we contrast the formulations of Althusserian Marxism with Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Systems - the one considered peripheral, which is recognized as legitimate in the sociological field - the regarding the way in which both, anchored in this epistemological position, forward their formulations and theoretical proposals with regard to the classic sociological question of social differentiation / integration. Therefore, at first, we situate anti-humanism in the face of the current sociological problem and the political configuration to which it is inserted. In a second step, we pass on to the authors in question, with the help of commentators: Althusserian Marxism and its structural proposal are analyzed and, soon after, the systems theory. Fleeing a necessary synthesis between them, we highlight their differences so that, based on the highlight of this plurality,","PeriodicalId":187793,"journal":{"name":"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2017V22N1P270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a reflection on the currentness of theoretical anti-humanism as a problem for contemporary social thought, we contrast the formulations of Althusserian Marxism with Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Systems - the one considered peripheral, which is recognized as legitimate in the sociological field - the regarding the way in which both, anchored in this epistemological position, forward their formulations and theoretical proposals with regard to the classic sociological question of social differentiation / integration. Therefore, at first, we situate anti-humanism in the face of the current sociological problem and the political configuration to which it is inserted. In a second step, we pass on to the authors in question, with the help of commentators: Althusserian Marxism and its structural proposal are analyzed and, soon after, the systems theory. Fleeing a necessary synthesis between them, we highlight their differences so that, based on the highlight of this plurality,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理论反人文主义的现状:卢曼和阿尔都塞面临社会分化/融合的问题
作为对当前理论反人文主义作为当代社会思想的一个问题的反思,我们将阿尔都塞马克思主义的表述与尼古拉斯·卢曼的系统理论进行了对比——后者被认为是边缘的,但在社会学领域被认为是合法的——关于两者的方式,都锚定在认识论的立场上,针对社会分化/整合这一经典社会学问题,提出了他们的表述和理论建议。因此,首先,我们将反人文主义置于当前的社会学问题和它所插入的政治结构面前。在第二步中,我们在评论家的帮助下,将讨论作者:分析阿尔都塞马克思主义及其结构建议,随后,系统理论。为了避免在它们之间进行必要的综合,我们强调了它们之间的差异,因此,在强调这种多样性的基础上,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
El Pueblo como Comunidad de Afectos. Demanda Social y Desborde de la Democracia Liberal en la Teoría Política Populista Pobres e Miseráveis? Preconceitos Contra Povos Indígenas na Região do Alto Rio Negro (AM) A linguagem Política na Era Digital: O Populismo de Matteo Salvini na Itália O Povo como Categoria Política no Pensamento de Jacques Rancière e Ernesto Laclau As Políticas do Olhar: Um Diálogo Entre a Sociologia do Conhecimento de Karl Mannheim e a Epistemologia Feminista 'High Tech' de Donna Haraway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1