A Comparative Study of Sentence Building in Writing Ability Among Students in Indonesia

Sari Famularsih, M. Helmy
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Sentence Building in Writing Ability Among Students in Indonesia","authors":"Sari Famularsih, M. Helmy","doi":"10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on a comparative study of sentence building between the better students (more knowledgeable) and the novice students (less knowledgeable) in writing 1 class. It belongs to qualitative research involving two respondents of the better and the novice students. Three questions emerge in this research related to the dominant sentence types between the better and the novice students, the challenges and strategies in writing. Those questions are (1) What types of sentences dominate the building of the sentence of novice and better students? (2) What are the challenges in writing between novice and better students?, and (3) What are the students’ strategies in writing?.  In order to answer those three research questions, I run two methods of data collection. The first one is email observation, which tries to find an answer to the dominant sentence types of the better and the novice students. The second method is a face-to-face interview to get more in-depth insight and understanding of the challenges and strategies in writing. As a result, the better student surprisingly dominates her paragraph writing assignments with complex sentences that show her advanced writing skills as the effect of her writing practice. Meanwhile, the novice one mostly occupies simple sentences to avoid errors because she has an inadequate practice that exposes her fear. In terms of challenges, this study finds five items, including the complex process of writing, anxiety, and panic, time constraints, grammar, and vocabulary. In the case of writing strategies, the finding reveals four items, such as short writing, frequent writing, dictionary usage, and reading practice.  \n ","PeriodicalId":443442,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research focuses on a comparative study of sentence building between the better students (more knowledgeable) and the novice students (less knowledgeable) in writing 1 class. It belongs to qualitative research involving two respondents of the better and the novice students. Three questions emerge in this research related to the dominant sentence types between the better and the novice students, the challenges and strategies in writing. Those questions are (1) What types of sentences dominate the building of the sentence of novice and better students? (2) What are the challenges in writing between novice and better students?, and (3) What are the students’ strategies in writing?.  In order to answer those three research questions, I run two methods of data collection. The first one is email observation, which tries to find an answer to the dominant sentence types of the better and the novice students. The second method is a face-to-face interview to get more in-depth insight and understanding of the challenges and strategies in writing. As a result, the better student surprisingly dominates her paragraph writing assignments with complex sentences that show her advanced writing skills as the effect of her writing practice. Meanwhile, the novice one mostly occupies simple sentences to avoid errors because she has an inadequate practice that exposes her fear. In terms of challenges, this study finds five items, including the complex process of writing, anxiety, and panic, time constraints, grammar, and vocabulary. In the case of writing strategies, the finding reveals four items, such as short writing, frequent writing, dictionary usage, and reading practice.   
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚学生写作能力造句的比较研究
本研究的重点是对写作1课上较好的学生(知识较丰富)和初级学生(知识较贫乏)造句能力的比较研究。本研究属于质性研究,调查对象为优等生和新手。在本研究中,出现了三个问题,涉及到优等生和初等生的主要句子类型、写作中的挑战和策略。这些问题是:(1)什么类型的句子主导了新手和优等生的句子构建?(2)新手和优等生在写作上的挑战是什么?(3)学生的写作策略是什么?为了回答这三个研究问题,我使用了两种数据收集方法。第一个是电子邮件观察,试图找到一个答案,以优势和新手学生的主要句型。第二种方法是面对面的面试,以获得更深入的洞察和理解写作中的挑战和策略。结果,成绩较好的学生出人意料地在她的段落写作作业中占据了主导地位,这表明她的写作技巧是她写作练习的结果。同时,新手为了避免出错,多是用简单的句子,因为练习不足,暴露了自己的恐惧。在挑战方面,本研究发现了五个项目,包括复杂的写作过程,焦虑和恐慌,时间限制,语法和词汇。就写作策略而言,研究结果揭示了四项内容,如简短写作、频繁写作、使用字典和阅读练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilizing Mobile Apps and Games to Implement MALL (Mobile Assisted Language Learning) during Covid-19 Pandemic Reading Self-Efficacy of EFL Students on Pre-Service Teaching Program and Practice in the EFL Classrooms The Effectiveness of Machine Translation Using “Google Translate” in English Language Learning in Bangladesh Indonesian Young EFL Learners’ Experiences in Learning Environmental Literacy through Digital Storytelling: A Case Study Tenth-Graders’ Perceptions towards the Use of Google Classroom for Writing Class
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1