A Study of Legal Philosophy on the 5·18 Civilian Militia's Activities: Centered on the Relationship between Governmental Authority and Vigilantism

Myeong-Soo Jeon
{"title":"A Study of Legal Philosophy on the 5·18 Civilian Militia's Activities: Centered on the Relationship between Governmental Authority and Vigilantism","authors":"Myeong-Soo Jeon","doi":"10.55082/jdp.2022.5.2.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The May-18 Citizen Militia, as a good-willed vigilante corps armed to resist the evil governmental authority after the mass firing of martial law forces on May 21, 1980, realized a peaceful world called Dae-dong-se-sang (or the wholly equalized one) for 5 days from the 22nd until the 26th of the month and publicized the New-Army Group's crime of destroying the constitutional order and Gwangju citizens' dedicated efforts around the world through the Final Resistance. This paper specifies the spirit of May 18 Demonstration Movement by examining the vigilante activities of the militia and illuminates its precious value in the light of Thomas Hobbes's and John Locke's philosophical idea on the relationship between governmental authority and people’s resistance right. As a research method, the discourse of vigilantism is applied to the formation and activities of the militia, and their vigilantism activities are studied in terms of legal philosophy. In the process, this research explains the rationale of exercising the governmental power by the idea of Hobbes' Leviathan and illuminates the legitimacy of the militia's activities of vigilantism by Locke's theory of governance. And also, it argues the value of studying the militia's formation and activities by confirming the contact points with Locke's idea through reinterpreting Hobbes's thought. Lastly, this study defines the 5·18 spirit as sovereignty vested in the people, vigilant resistance, Dae-dong-se-sang, the idea of human rights, and protection of democracy and expects that legal philosophical considerations integrating historical fact research and political interpretation will contribute to the investigation of the facts of May 18 Demonstration Movement and the commemoration and succession of the event.","PeriodicalId":263375,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Peace Institute, Chosun University","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democracy and Peace Institute, Chosun University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55082/jdp.2022.5.2.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The May-18 Citizen Militia, as a good-willed vigilante corps armed to resist the evil governmental authority after the mass firing of martial law forces on May 21, 1980, realized a peaceful world called Dae-dong-se-sang (or the wholly equalized one) for 5 days from the 22nd until the 26th of the month and publicized the New-Army Group's crime of destroying the constitutional order and Gwangju citizens' dedicated efforts around the world through the Final Resistance. This paper specifies the spirit of May 18 Demonstration Movement by examining the vigilante activities of the militia and illuminates its precious value in the light of Thomas Hobbes's and John Locke's philosophical idea on the relationship between governmental authority and people’s resistance right. As a research method, the discourse of vigilantism is applied to the formation and activities of the militia, and their vigilantism activities are studied in terms of legal philosophy. In the process, this research explains the rationale of exercising the governmental power by the idea of Hobbes' Leviathan and illuminates the legitimacy of the militia's activities of vigilantism by Locke's theory of governance. And also, it argues the value of studying the militia's formation and activities by confirming the contact points with Locke's idea through reinterpreting Hobbes's thought. Lastly, this study defines the 5·18 spirit as sovereignty vested in the people, vigilant resistance, Dae-dong-se-sang, the idea of human rights, and protection of democracy and expects that legal philosophical considerations integrating historical fact research and political interpretation will contribute to the investigation of the facts of May 18 Demonstration Movement and the commemoration and succession of the event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5.18民团活动的法哲学研究——以政府权力与民团的关系为中心
1980年5月21日戒严部队大规模射击后,为抵抗邪恶政权而武装起来的“5·18民团”从22日开始到26日为止,用5天时间实现了“大东世相”的和平世界,并通过“最后抵抗”向全世界宣传了新军集团破坏宪法秩序的罪行和光州市民的奉献精神。本文通过考察民团的民团活动,明确了五一八示威运动的精神,并结合霍布斯和洛克关于政府权威与人民抵抗权关系的哲学思想,阐释了五一八示威运动的宝贵价值。作为一种研究方法,将义警话语应用于民兵的形成和活动,并从法哲学的角度对其义警活动进行研究。在此过程中,本研究以霍布斯的利维坦思想解释了政府权力行使的基本原理,并以洛克的治理理论阐明了民兵的警戒主义活动的合法性。同时,通过对霍布斯思想的重新阐释,确认了与洛克思想的契合点,论证了研究民兵的形成和活动的价值。最后,本研究将5.18精神定义为主权归属于国民、警惕抵抗、大东世相、人权理念、保护民主主义,并期望将历史事实研究与政治解释相结合的法律哲学思考将有助于5.18事件的事实调查和纪念与传承。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Activity and Damage of Commissioner Ahn Byungha and the Police of Jeonnam Province during the 5·18 Period A Study of Legal Philosophy on the 5·18 Civilian Militia's Activities: Centered on the Relationship between Governmental Authority and Vigilantism A Study of Aesthetic Politics on the Well-Timed Value of May 18 Dance Problems after the Introduction of the Local Community Policing System and Civil-Police Cooperation as its Alternative Awakening of Wartime Sexual Assault in Paco's Story by Larry Heinemann
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1