Development of an instrument for the assessment of scenarios of work 4.0 based on socio-technical criteria

S. Jenderny, Marc Foullois, Anna-Lena Kato-Beiderwieden, Michael Bansmann, Lars Wöste, Josefine Lamß, G. W. Maier, C. Röcker
{"title":"Development of an instrument for the assessment of scenarios of work 4.0 based on socio-technical criteria","authors":"S. Jenderny, Marc Foullois, Anna-Lena Kato-Beiderwieden, Michael Bansmann, Lars Wöste, Josefine Lamß, G. W. Maier, C. Röcker","doi":"10.1145/3197768.3201566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mechanical engineering and related industries are increasingly being dominated by information and communication technology, leading to the development of cyber-physical systems. However, these systems have to be seen from a broader angle, incorporating several other environmental factors such as the organizational structure or human factors. For this reason, the technology cannot be seen as solitary system, but should rather be included in the context of a scenario of work 4.0. These scenarios can help to classify new technologies, their advantages and constraints in order to provide guidance for the digital development of organizations. While several frameworks have been proposed in terms of technological guidance, most of them focus heavily on technology, neglecting their organizational- and human factors. In order to form a uniform understanding of the construct of industry 4.0, we developed an instrument for rating scenarios of work 4.0 on the relevant dimensions 'technology', 'human' and 'organization'. This paper describes the chosen relevant criteria including possible constraints we encountered. Future work on this topic will include the creation of profiles of scenarios of work 4.0, further validation of the criteria.","PeriodicalId":130190,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3197768.3201566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The mechanical engineering and related industries are increasingly being dominated by information and communication technology, leading to the development of cyber-physical systems. However, these systems have to be seen from a broader angle, incorporating several other environmental factors such as the organizational structure or human factors. For this reason, the technology cannot be seen as solitary system, but should rather be included in the context of a scenario of work 4.0. These scenarios can help to classify new technologies, their advantages and constraints in order to provide guidance for the digital development of organizations. While several frameworks have been proposed in terms of technological guidance, most of them focus heavily on technology, neglecting their organizational- and human factors. In order to form a uniform understanding of the construct of industry 4.0, we developed an instrument for rating scenarios of work 4.0 on the relevant dimensions 'technology', 'human' and 'organization'. This paper describes the chosen relevant criteria including possible constraints we encountered. Future work on this topic will include the creation of profiles of scenarios of work 4.0, further validation of the criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发基于社会技术标准的工作4.0情景评估工具
信息通信技术日益成为机械工程及相关行业的主导,导致了信息物理系统的发展。然而,这些系统必须从更广泛的角度来看待,包括其他一些环境因素,如组织结构或人为因素。由于这个原因,这项技术不能被看作是一个孤立的系统,而应该包含在工作4.0场景的上下文中。这些场景可以帮助对新技术、它们的优势和限制进行分类,以便为组织的数字化发展提供指导。虽然在技术指导方面已经提出了几个框架,但大多数框架都着重于技术,而忽略了其组织和人为因素。为了形成对工业4.0构建的统一理解,我们开发了一种工具,用于在“技术”,“人”和“组织”相关维度上对工作4.0的场景进行评级。本文描述了所选择的相关标准,包括我们遇到的可能的约束。关于这个主题的未来工作将包括创建工作4.0场景的概要文件,进一步验证标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Video Based Fall Detection using Features of Motion, Shape and Histogram Evaluating the training transfer of Head-Mounted Display based training for assembly tasks A Taxonomy in Robot-Assisted Training: Current Trends, Needs and Challenges Bicycles and Wheelchairs for Locomotion Control of a Simulated Telerobot Supported by Gaze- and Head-Interaction Experiences with an Assistive System for Manual Assembly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1