Patterns and Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence among Pregnant Women Attending Healthcare Centers in Obio-Akpor, Rivers State

Israel Udo William, C. Onyema, Oparanma Florence Uche, Goodluck Azuonwu
{"title":"Patterns and Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence among Pregnant Women Attending Healthcare Centers in Obio-Akpor, Rivers State","authors":"Israel Udo William, C. Onyema, Oparanma Florence Uche, Goodluck Azuonwu","doi":"10.54117/sjmams.v2i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intimate partner violence though not consistent with our cultural and traditional values and beliefs as a people, is becoming rampant and this is a misnomer. Intimate partner violence (IPV) especially among women is a global phenomenon and has become a major public health concern. The researcher adopted a descriptive cross-sectional study design to assess patterns and predictors of intimate partner violence among pregnant mothers attending healthcare Centre’s in Obio/Akpor L.G.A., River’s state. A self-structured survey was utilized to gather information from 416 systematically selected pregnant mothers with a response rate of 412(99%). Data was evaluated utilizing descriptive and inferential statistics at a 5% degree of significance. Findings showed that many of the respondents ages 23 – 31years, married, with tertiary education, of Christian faith, were into business and had two children. The prevalence of IPV before pregnancy was 21.4% while in current pregnancy it was 20.1%. The most common violence act was physical 83(20.1%), followed by verbal violence 79(19.2%), emotional violence accounted for 76(18.4%), psychological violence 68(16.5%) while the least reported was sexual violence with about 57(13.8%). Domestic and financial issues were the cause of most violent experiences accounting for 19.9% and 19.4%. Statistical analysis using multinomial logistic regression showed that educational attainment (p; 0.000) and lifestyle of the husband (p = 0.000) were the socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors respectively associated with IPV. It is recommended that screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant women should be provided as uniform care during antenatal visits.","PeriodicalId":325436,"journal":{"name":"Scicom Journal of Medical and Applied Medical Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scicom Journal of Medical and Applied Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54117/sjmams.v2i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence though not consistent with our cultural and traditional values and beliefs as a people, is becoming rampant and this is a misnomer. Intimate partner violence (IPV) especially among women is a global phenomenon and has become a major public health concern. The researcher adopted a descriptive cross-sectional study design to assess patterns and predictors of intimate partner violence among pregnant mothers attending healthcare Centre’s in Obio/Akpor L.G.A., River’s state. A self-structured survey was utilized to gather information from 416 systematically selected pregnant mothers with a response rate of 412(99%). Data was evaluated utilizing descriptive and inferential statistics at a 5% degree of significance. Findings showed that many of the respondents ages 23 – 31years, married, with tertiary education, of Christian faith, were into business and had two children. The prevalence of IPV before pregnancy was 21.4% while in current pregnancy it was 20.1%. The most common violence act was physical 83(20.1%), followed by verbal violence 79(19.2%), emotional violence accounted for 76(18.4%), psychological violence 68(16.5%) while the least reported was sexual violence with about 57(13.8%). Domestic and financial issues were the cause of most violent experiences accounting for 19.9% and 19.4%. Statistical analysis using multinomial logistic regression showed that educational attainment (p; 0.000) and lifestyle of the husband (p = 0.000) were the socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors respectively associated with IPV. It is recommended that screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant women should be provided as uniform care during antenatal visits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
河流州奥比奥-阿克波尔保健中心孕妇亲密伴侣暴力的模式和预测因素
亲密伴侣暴力虽然不符合我们作为一个民族的文化和传统价值观和信仰,但正在变得猖獗,这是一种用词不当。亲密伴侣暴力,特别是妇女之间的暴力是一种全球现象,已成为一个主要的公共卫生问题。研究者采用描述性横断面研究设计来评估在River州Obio/Akpor L.G.A保健中心就诊的孕妇中亲密伴侣暴力的模式和预测因素。采用自结构调查,系统选取416名孕妇,回复率为412(99%)。数据评估利用描述性和推理统计在5%的显著性程度。调查结果显示,许多受访者年龄在23 - 31岁之间,已婚,受过高等教育,信仰基督教,从事商业活动,有两个孩子。妊娠前IPV患病率为21.4%,妊娠期为20.1%。最常见的暴力行为是肢体暴力83件(20.1%),其次是言语暴力79件(19.2%),情绪暴力76件(18.4%),心理暴力68件(16.5%),而最少的是性暴力57件(13.8%)。家庭和经济问题是导致暴力事件的主要原因,分别占19.9%和19.4%。采用多项逻辑回归进行统计分析,发现受教育程度(p;0.000)和丈夫的生活方式(p = 0.000)分别是与IPV相关的社会经济和社会人口因素。建议对孕妇进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查,作为产前检查期间的统一护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Modern Family Planning Methods among Men in Ogbogu Community in Ogba-Egbema-Ndoni Local Government Area of Rivers State Patterns and Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence among Pregnant Women Attending Healthcare Centers in Obio-Akpor, Rivers State Knowledge and Practice of Exclusive Breastfeeding among Working-Class Mothers in Rumuigbo Community, Obio Akpo Local Government Area of Rivers State Awareness level of Women of Abua Central on Cervical Cancer Screening and the Practice Effect of Formaldehyde Exposure on Oxidative Stress Markers, Liver and Kidneys of Medical Students during Dissection in Gross Anatomy Laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1