Effect of Formaldehyde Exposure on Oxidative Stress Markers, Liver and Kidneys of Medical Students during Dissection in Gross Anatomy Laboratory

M. Olisah, S. Meludu, C. Dioka
{"title":"Effect of Formaldehyde Exposure on Oxidative Stress Markers, Liver and Kidneys of Medical Students during Dissection in Gross Anatomy Laboratory","authors":"M. Olisah, S. Meludu, C. Dioka","doi":"10.54117/sjmams.v1i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical students are routinely exposed to formaldehyde during their dissecting practical classes and human exposure to formaldehyde is associated with multiple adverse effects. Chronic exposures may cause oxidative stress and may result in some vital organ damage. Materials/Methods: The study included the total class population of the 2017 set of medical students (56 male students) from College of Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Uli. These students were recruited immediately after first year, that is, before the commencement of dissection. Baseline samples were collected before exposure to formaldehyde. Subsequent samples were collected at one month, three and six-month intervals. All samples were collected immediately after dissection at the required period. The dissection periods are two times per week each lasting for 3 hours (1-4 pm). Eight millilitres (8 ml) of fasting blood samples were collected from all subjects by sterile disposable syringes into a sterile plain container and allowed to clot, retracted and centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Thereafter, serum was separated into two aliquots. One part of the samples were stored at -20 ˚C for analysis of oxidative stress markers (GPx, SOD and MDA) within two weeks of collection, while the remaining aliquot was stored at -20 ˚C and used for the analysis of liver and kidney markers. Data obtained was analyzed using SPSS version 2021. Results: Glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were significantly reduced after one and three-month periodic exposures when compared with the baseline study. Malondialdehyde (MDA) level was significantly lower when the baseline study was compared with the one month and three-month exposure but does not differ significantly from that of six-month exposures. The activity of ALT was significantly higher after one and three-month periodic exposures when compared with the baseline study. However, when the baseline study was compared with six-month exposures, it was not significant. When the activities of AST, ALP and other liver markers which include albumin, AFP, total protein, conjugated and unconjugated bilirubin of baseline study were compared with the one, three and six-month periodic exposures, it was not statistically significant across all groups. When the concentrations of the serum electrolytes of the baseline study were compared with one, three and six-month periodic exposures, it was not statistically significant. However, the concentration of urea was found to be significant when one-month periodic exposures were compared with the baseline study.","PeriodicalId":325436,"journal":{"name":"Scicom Journal of Medical and Applied Medical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scicom Journal of Medical and Applied Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54117/sjmams.v1i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical students are routinely exposed to formaldehyde during their dissecting practical classes and human exposure to formaldehyde is associated with multiple adverse effects. Chronic exposures may cause oxidative stress and may result in some vital organ damage. Materials/Methods: The study included the total class population of the 2017 set of medical students (56 male students) from College of Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Uli. These students were recruited immediately after first year, that is, before the commencement of dissection. Baseline samples were collected before exposure to formaldehyde. Subsequent samples were collected at one month, three and six-month intervals. All samples were collected immediately after dissection at the required period. The dissection periods are two times per week each lasting for 3 hours (1-4 pm). Eight millilitres (8 ml) of fasting blood samples were collected from all subjects by sterile disposable syringes into a sterile plain container and allowed to clot, retracted and centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Thereafter, serum was separated into two aliquots. One part of the samples were stored at -20 ˚C for analysis of oxidative stress markers (GPx, SOD and MDA) within two weeks of collection, while the remaining aliquot was stored at -20 ˚C and used for the analysis of liver and kidney markers. Data obtained was analyzed using SPSS version 2021. Results: Glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were significantly reduced after one and three-month periodic exposures when compared with the baseline study. Malondialdehyde (MDA) level was significantly lower when the baseline study was compared with the one month and three-month exposure but does not differ significantly from that of six-month exposures. The activity of ALT was significantly higher after one and three-month periodic exposures when compared with the baseline study. However, when the baseline study was compared with six-month exposures, it was not significant. When the activities of AST, ALP and other liver markers which include albumin, AFP, total protein, conjugated and unconjugated bilirubin of baseline study were compared with the one, three and six-month periodic exposures, it was not statistically significant across all groups. When the concentrations of the serum electrolytes of the baseline study were compared with one, three and six-month periodic exposures, it was not statistically significant. However, the concentration of urea was found to be significant when one-month periodic exposures were compared with the baseline study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大体解剖实验室解剖过程中甲醛暴露对医学生氧化应激标志物及肝脏、肾脏的影响
背景:医学生在解剖实践课上经常接触甲醛,人体接触甲醛会产生多种不良反应。长期接触可能引起氧化应激,并可能导致一些重要器官受损。材料/方法:研究对象为乌利市楚库梅卡Odumegwu Ojukwu大学医学院2017届医学生总班级人口(男学生56名)。这些学生是在第一年之后立即招募的,也就是说,在解剖开始之前。基线样本是在接触甲醛之前收集的。随后的样本分别在1个月、3个月和6个月的间隔中收集。所有标本在解剖后立即采集。解剖期为每周两次,每次持续3小时(下午1-4点)。用一次性无菌注射器从所有受试者身上采集8毫升(8ml)空腹血液样本,放入无菌普通容器中,以3000转/分的速度凝血、缩回并离心10分钟。随后,将血清分成两等份。一部分样品在-20˚C保存,两周内用于氧化应激标志物(GPx、SOD和MDA)的分析,其余样品在-20˚C保存,用于肝脏和肾脏标志物的分析。获得的数据使用SPSS 2021版进行分析。结果:与基线研究相比,谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性在1个月和3个月的周期暴露后显著降低。当基线研究与一个月和三个月的暴露相比,丙二醛(MDA)水平显着降低,但与六个月的暴露没有显着差异。与基线研究相比,1个月和3个月的定期暴露后ALT活性显著升高。然而,当基线研究与六个月的暴露进行比较时,效果并不显著。将基线研究的AST、ALP及其他肝脏标志物白蛋白、AFP、总蛋白、偶联和未偶联胆红素的活性与1、3、6个月的周期暴露进行比较,各组间差异均无统计学意义。当基线研究的血清电解质浓度与1、3和6个月的定期暴露进行比较时,没有统计学意义。然而,当一个月的定期暴露与基线研究比较时,发现尿素浓度显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Modern Family Planning Methods among Men in Ogbogu Community in Ogba-Egbema-Ndoni Local Government Area of Rivers State Patterns and Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence among Pregnant Women Attending Healthcare Centers in Obio-Akpor, Rivers State Knowledge and Practice of Exclusive Breastfeeding among Working-Class Mothers in Rumuigbo Community, Obio Akpo Local Government Area of Rivers State Awareness level of Women of Abua Central on Cervical Cancer Screening and the Practice Effect of Formaldehyde Exposure on Oxidative Stress Markers, Liver and Kidneys of Medical Students during Dissection in Gross Anatomy Laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1