Reformholdninger og didaktiske positioner blandt lærere i den danske gymnasieskole

Steen Beck, Michael Paulsen
{"title":"Reformholdninger og didaktiske positioner blandt lærere i den danske gymnasieskole","authors":"Steen Beck, Michael Paulsen","doi":"10.57126/noad.v2i1.12778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analyze didactical positions among teachers in the Danish Upper Secondary School. We discuss how the positions are influenced by the reform from 2005. We argue that a social oriented constructivism has been strengthened by the reform and an objectivistic approach has been weakened. By analyzing data from three subjects – Social Science, Danish and Physics – we show that the changes of power relations have different didactical consequences within the three subjects. Another point is that the reform with its focus on application, innovative skills, inter-disciplinarity and study competence has not changed the didactical positions of teachers radically. They prefer to use already existing approaches to create a practice they can accept. Also we show that the reality of diversity among students is important when it comes to the question how teachers position themselves towards learning and teaching. In the end of the paper we discuss what it means to lead an Upper Secondary School where different positions towards didactics coexist.","PeriodicalId":211767,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57126/noad.v2i1.12778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we analyze didactical positions among teachers in the Danish Upper Secondary School. We discuss how the positions are influenced by the reform from 2005. We argue that a social oriented constructivism has been strengthened by the reform and an objectivistic approach has been weakened. By analyzing data from three subjects – Social Science, Danish and Physics – we show that the changes of power relations have different didactical consequences within the three subjects. Another point is that the reform with its focus on application, innovative skills, inter-disciplinarity and study competence has not changed the didactical positions of teachers radically. They prefer to use already existing approaches to create a practice they can accept. Also we show that the reality of diversity among students is important when it comes to the question how teachers position themselves towards learning and teaching. In the end of the paper we discuss what it means to lead an Upper Secondary School where different positions towards didactics coexist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文对丹麦高中教师的教学立场进行了分析。我们讨论了2005年以来改革对这些职位的影响。我们认为,改革加强了以社会为导向的建构主义,削弱了客观主义的研究方法。通过分析社会科学、丹麦语和物理这三门学科的数据,我们发现权力关系的变化在这三门学科中具有不同的教学后果。另一方面,以应用性、创新能力、跨学科性和学习能力为重点的改革并没有从根本上改变教师的教学地位。他们更喜欢使用已经存在的方法来创建他们可以接受的实践。我们还表明,当涉及到教师如何定位自己的学习和教学问题时,学生多样性的现实很重要。在文章的最后,我们讨论了在不同的教学立场共存的情况下,领导高中意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reformimplementering i förskolepraktik God udeskoleundervisning Alexander von Oettingen: Allmän didaktik – mellan normativitet och evidens. Lund: Studentlitteratur Att bilda eller bedöma? Mänskliga rättigheter som innehåll i undervisningen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1