Clausewitz’s “Strange Trinity” and the Dysfunctionality of War

T. M. Holmes
{"title":"Clausewitz’s “Strange Trinity” and the Dysfunctionality of War","authors":"T. M. Holmes","doi":"10.22618/tp.pjcv.20226.1.127.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By contrast with the Holy Trinity, Clausewitz’s “strange trinity” is an unstable system, whose three “dominant tendencies” compete for mastery over the realm of war. One tendency is the subordination of war to the aims of policy, but that is constantly challenged by the other two—blind hatred and the enjoyment of adventure. The political tendency is the only one that treats war as the function of a purpose beyond war, but only intermittently does that tendency predominate, meaning that war is more often than not a dysfunctional undertaking and always a highly dubious instrument of policy.","PeriodicalId":220201,"journal":{"name":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22618/tp.pjcv.20226.1.127.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By contrast with the Holy Trinity, Clausewitz’s “strange trinity” is an unstable system, whose three “dominant tendencies” compete for mastery over the realm of war. One tendency is the subordination of war to the aims of policy, but that is constantly challenged by the other two—blind hatred and the enjoyment of adventure. The political tendency is the only one that treats war as the function of a purpose beyond war, but only intermittently does that tendency predominate, meaning that war is more often than not a dysfunctional undertaking and always a highly dubious instrument of policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克劳塞维茨的“奇怪的三位一体”与战争的功能失调
与“神圣三位一体”相比,克劳塞维茨的“奇怪三位一体”是一个不稳定的体系,它的三种“主导倾向”争夺对战争领域的控制权。一种倾向是使战争服从于政策目标,但这种倾向不断受到另外两种倾向的挑战——盲目的仇恨和冒险的乐趣。政治倾向是唯一一种将战争视为超越战争目的的功能,但这种倾向只是断断续续地占主导地位,这意味着战争往往是一项功能失调的事业,总是一种高度可疑的政策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Haneke, Moral Violence and Morbid Curiosity Accounting for Alliances in Clausewitz’s Theory of War Three Platonic Themes in Clausewitz: A Forgotten Legacy The Conception of stasis and pleonexia in Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings: Platonic Influences and Bricolages ‘They’re Saved from the Blessings of Civilization’: Violence, Law, and Progress in the Westerns of John Ford
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1