Out of the Closet and Up the Ladder? Diversity in Ontario’s Big Law Firms

Asher Alkoby, Pnina Alon-Shenker
{"title":"Out of the Closet and Up the Ladder? Diversity in Ontario’s Big Law Firms","authors":"Asher Alkoby, Pnina Alon-Shenker","doi":"10.22329/WYAJ.V34I2.5021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Canadian law generally provides protection against sexual orientation discrimination, and social acceptance is growing, there are some indications that LGBTQ lawyers face barriers relating to their sexual identity. Although more LGBTQ lawyers are now ‘out at work’, quantitative data is incomplete, and little is known about the actual experience of LGBTQ lawyers, who enter big firms in Ontario with the hope to advance through the ranks. This article begins to address this gap by providing qualitative analysis of the personal experience of LGBTQ lawyers entering the profession and the extent to which in-firm diversity initiatives shape their experience. Three main themes emerged from the interviews. First, racialized gay lawyers more consciously described their experiences at big law firms as negative and related it to their minority status. Second, the interviews offer insight into the ways in which gays and lesbians are forced to negotiate and perform their identity in a heteronormative workplace. Finally, the insights gleaned from the interviews suggest that the diversity programs devised by law firms may have helped diversify the lower ranks of law firms, but they seem to have failed to address the barriers that equity-seeking groups continue to face in retention and advancement through the ranks. The heteronormative organizational culture, as well as the promotion and compensation structures in firms continue to drive the composition of the leadership ranks and it arguably perpetuates homogeneity.","PeriodicalId":292127,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Employment Contract Law (Topic)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Employment Contract Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V34I2.5021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While Canadian law generally provides protection against sexual orientation discrimination, and social acceptance is growing, there are some indications that LGBTQ lawyers face barriers relating to their sexual identity. Although more LGBTQ lawyers are now ‘out at work’, quantitative data is incomplete, and little is known about the actual experience of LGBTQ lawyers, who enter big firms in Ontario with the hope to advance through the ranks. This article begins to address this gap by providing qualitative analysis of the personal experience of LGBTQ lawyers entering the profession and the extent to which in-firm diversity initiatives shape their experience. Three main themes emerged from the interviews. First, racialized gay lawyers more consciously described their experiences at big law firms as negative and related it to their minority status. Second, the interviews offer insight into the ways in which gays and lesbians are forced to negotiate and perform their identity in a heteronormative workplace. Finally, the insights gleaned from the interviews suggest that the diversity programs devised by law firms may have helped diversify the lower ranks of law firms, but they seem to have failed to address the barriers that equity-seeking groups continue to face in retention and advancement through the ranks. The heteronormative organizational culture, as well as the promotion and compensation structures in firms continue to drive the composition of the leadership ranks and it arguably perpetuates homogeneity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走出壁橱,爬上梯子?安大略省大型律师事务所的多样性
虽然加拿大法律一般都提供保护,防止性取向歧视,社会接受度也在增长,但有迹象表明,LGBTQ律师面临着与他们的性身份有关的障碍。虽然现在有更多的LGBTQ律师“出柜工作”,但定量数据不完整,而且对于LGBTQ律师的实际经历知之甚少,他们进入安大略省的大公司,希望能够晋升。本文通过对进入律师行业的LGBTQ律师的个人经历进行定性分析,以及律所内部多元化倡议在多大程度上影响了他们的经历,开始解决这一差距。采访中出现了三个主要主题。首先,种族化的同性恋律师更有意识地将他们在大型律师事务所的经历描述为负面的,并将其与他们的少数族裔身份联系起来。其次,这些访谈提供了对同性恋者被迫在异性恋规范的工作场所谈判和表现自己身份的方式的洞察。最后,从访谈中收集到的见解表明,律师事务所设计的多元化计划可能有助于使律师事务所的下层多样化,但它们似乎未能解决寻求平等的团体在保留和晋升方面继续面临的障碍。异质规范的组织文化,以及公司的晋升和薪酬结构,继续推动着领导阶层的构成,可以说,它使同质性永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The AB5 Experiment – Should States Adopt California’s Worker Classification Law? A Note on Antitrust, Labor, and 'No Cold Call' Agreements in Silicon Valley Critical Analysis of Violation of Work Agreement Clause The Economic Basis of the Independent Contractor/Employee Distinction Hierarchies without firms? Vertical disintegration, outsourcing and the nature of the platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1