Examining the factors that influence medication administration errors and the reporting of these among mental health nurses in the hospital setting: a systematic review

Pearl Casey, James O Mahony, E. Lehane, S. McCarthy
{"title":"Examining the factors that influence medication administration errors and the reporting of these among mental health nurses in the hospital setting: a systematic review","authors":"Pearl Casey, James O Mahony, E. Lehane, S. McCarthy","doi":"10.12968/bjmh.2021.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A medication administration error is defined as ‘any difference between what the patient received or was supposed to receive and what the prescriber intended in the original order’. Medication administration errors are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. They occur frequently in the mental health setting and pose a serious risk of patient harm. The factors leading to medication administration errors in the mental health care setting is under researched and the potential for mental health services to prevent harm from medication administration error is unknown. The aim of this study was to understand factors that influence medication administration errors, and the reporting of these, among mental health nurses in the mental health hospital setting. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (2015) checklist. A total of 3625 studies were identified, nine of which were included for final review. The CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, Medline, Medline Ovid, Psych Info and PubMed databases were searched, as well as grey literature. Medication administration errors and their reporting are complex, multifaceted and show organisational and individual overlap. Heavy workload, staffing shortages, differing levels of experience, ward dynamics, lack of knowledge, interruptions, communication and patient interaction contributed to the occurrence of medication administration errors. Key factors included rationale on why not to report an error, lack of knowledge regarding how to report, what to report, as well as fear and stigma. Many factors lead to the occurrence of a medication administration error or why they are not reported. More education is needed to help reduce medication administration errors. Further research may understand the behavioural patterns of mental health nurses and at-risk behaviour. This may help identify adequate interventions to reduce the risk of medication administration errors in this setting.","PeriodicalId":149493,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjmh.2021.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A medication administration error is defined as ‘any difference between what the patient received or was supposed to receive and what the prescriber intended in the original order’. Medication administration errors are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. They occur frequently in the mental health setting and pose a serious risk of patient harm. The factors leading to medication administration errors in the mental health care setting is under researched and the potential for mental health services to prevent harm from medication administration error is unknown. The aim of this study was to understand factors that influence medication administration errors, and the reporting of these, among mental health nurses in the mental health hospital setting. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (2015) checklist. A total of 3625 studies were identified, nine of which were included for final review. The CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, Medline, Medline Ovid, Psych Info and PubMed databases were searched, as well as grey literature. Medication administration errors and their reporting are complex, multifaceted and show organisational and individual overlap. Heavy workload, staffing shortages, differing levels of experience, ward dynamics, lack of knowledge, interruptions, communication and patient interaction contributed to the occurrence of medication administration errors. Key factors included rationale on why not to report an error, lack of knowledge regarding how to report, what to report, as well as fear and stigma. Many factors lead to the occurrence of a medication administration error or why they are not reported. More education is needed to help reduce medication administration errors. Further research may understand the behavioural patterns of mental health nurses and at-risk behaviour. This may help identify adequate interventions to reduce the risk of medication administration errors in this setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查影响药物管理错误的因素和报告这些在医院设置的精神卫生护士:一个系统的回顾
给药错误被定义为“患者收到的或应该收到的药物与处方者在原始订单中的预期药物之间的任何差异”。给药错误与发病率和死亡率增加有关。这种情况在精神卫生机构中经常发生,对患者造成严重伤害。导致精神卫生保健机构给药错误的因素正在研究中,精神卫生服务预防给药错误危害的潜力尚不清楚。本研究的目的是了解影响药物管理错误的因素,并报告这些因素,在精神卫生医院设置的精神卫生护士。根据系统评价和荟萃分析方案(2015)的首选报告项目清单进行了系统评价。总共确定了3625项研究,其中9项纳入最终审查。检索CINAHL、Cochrane、EMBASE、Medline、Medline Ovid、Psych Info和PubMed数据库,以及灰色文献。药物管理错误及其报告是复杂的,多方面的,并显示组织和个人重叠。繁重的工作量、人员短缺、不同水平的经验、病房动态、缺乏知识、中断、沟通和患者互动导致了给药错误的发生。关键因素包括为什么不报告错误的理由,缺乏关于如何报告,报告什么的知识,以及恐惧和耻辱。许多因素导致药物管理错误的发生或为什么他们没有报告。需要更多的教育来帮助减少药物管理错误。进一步的研究可能会了解精神卫生护士的行为模式和高危行为。这可能有助于确定适当的干预措施,以减少在这种情况下药物管理错误的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How carers' needs can be met by staff within inpatient settings: a qualitative study Move to improve physical and mental health Community rehabilitation for people with severe and enduring mental health difficulties: a description and evaluation of a new community enhanced rehabilitation team Misuse of the Mental Capacity Act: ‘you have capacity to end your life and there is nothing we can do about it’ The experiences, views and beliefs of emerging adults and their carers of receiving adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic review and meta-ethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1