EVALUASI PROGRAM PRAKTIK INDUSTRI MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL CIPP

Budi Setyanto, Sukatiman Sukatiman, Aryanti Nurhidayati
{"title":"EVALUASI PROGRAM PRAKTIK INDUSTRI MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL CIPP","authors":"Budi Setyanto, Sukatiman Sukatiman, Aryanti Nurhidayati","doi":"10.20961/ijcee.v7i2.61095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak: Evaluasi merupakan komponen yang sangat penting dalam proses pengembangan program pendidikan. Dengan adanya evaluasi terhadap program praktik industri, diharapkan mampu mengetahui kelebihan dan kelemahan dari program yang telah berjalan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pelaksanaan program praktik industri Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan dilihat dari aspek konteks, input, proses, produk. Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode penelitian evaluatif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif. Pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik kuesioner/angket dan wawancara. Sampel yang digunakan adalah 38 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan (PTB) dari satu Universitas di Jawa Tengah, koordinator praktik industri Program Studi PTB, 9 dosen pembimbing, dan 4 pembimbing industri. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) evaluasi konteks pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan tinggi dengan persentase sebesar 80,22%; (2) evaluasi terhadap input pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan cukup dengan persentase sebesar 78,10%; (3) evaluasi terhadap proses pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan cukup dengan persentase sebesar 79,63%. (4) Evaluasi produk pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan tinggi dengan persentase sebesar 81,68%. Abstract: Evaluation is a very important component in the process of developing educational programs. With an evaluation of the industrial practical program, it is hoped that it will be able to find out the strengths and weaknesses of existing programs. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the industrial practical program of Building Engineering Education Students from the aspects of the context, input, process, product. This research was conducted using an evaluative research method with a descriptive quantitative approach. Data collection used questionnaires and interviews. The respondents came from one of the Building Engineering Education Study Program in one University in Central Java Indonesia. Respondents consist of 38 students, the industrial practice coordinator, 9 supervisors, and 4 industrial supervisors. Analysis of the data in this study using an average analysis technique that used assessment criteria. Research results showed: (1) evaluation of the context of industrial practice program implementation was classified as high with a percentage of 80.22%; (2) evaluation of the input for the implementation of industrial practice programs was classified as sufficient with a percentage of 78,10%; (3) evaluation of the industrial practice program implementation process was classified as sufficient with a percentage of 79,63%. (4) Evaluation of the product implementation of the industrial practice program was classified as high with a percentage of 81.68%.","PeriodicalId":416376,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal Of Civil Engineering Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal Of Civil Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/ijcee.v7i2.61095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstrak: Evaluasi merupakan komponen yang sangat penting dalam proses pengembangan program pendidikan. Dengan adanya evaluasi terhadap program praktik industri, diharapkan mampu mengetahui kelebihan dan kelemahan dari program yang telah berjalan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pelaksanaan program praktik industri Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan dilihat dari aspek konteks, input, proses, produk. Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode penelitian evaluatif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif. Pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik kuesioner/angket dan wawancara. Sampel yang digunakan adalah 38 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan (PTB) dari satu Universitas di Jawa Tengah, koordinator praktik industri Program Studi PTB, 9 dosen pembimbing, dan 4 pembimbing industri. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) evaluasi konteks pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan tinggi dengan persentase sebesar 80,22%; (2) evaluasi terhadap input pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan cukup dengan persentase sebesar 78,10%; (3) evaluasi terhadap proses pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan cukup dengan persentase sebesar 79,63%. (4) Evaluasi produk pelaksanaan program praktik industri dikategorikan tinggi dengan persentase sebesar 81,68%. Abstract: Evaluation is a very important component in the process of developing educational programs. With an evaluation of the industrial practical program, it is hoped that it will be able to find out the strengths and weaknesses of existing programs. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the industrial practical program of Building Engineering Education Students from the aspects of the context, input, process, product. This research was conducted using an evaluative research method with a descriptive quantitative approach. Data collection used questionnaires and interviews. The respondents came from one of the Building Engineering Education Study Program in one University in Central Java Indonesia. Respondents consist of 38 students, the industrial practice coordinator, 9 supervisors, and 4 industrial supervisors. Analysis of the data in this study using an average analysis technique that used assessment criteria. Research results showed: (1) evaluation of the context of industrial practice program implementation was classified as high with a percentage of 80.22%; (2) evaluation of the input for the implementation of industrial practice programs was classified as sufficient with a percentage of 78,10%; (3) evaluation of the industrial practice program implementation process was classified as sufficient with a percentage of 79,63%. (4) Evaluation of the product implementation of the industrial practice program was classified as high with a percentage of 81.68%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用CIPP模型进行学生建筑工程教育的工业实践项目评估
摘要:评估是教育项目发展过程中非常重要的组成部分。通过对行业实践项目的评估,我们希望能够评估项目的优点和缺点。本研究旨在从环境、输入、过程、产品等方面对学生工业实践项目的实施进行评估。该研究采用定量描述性方法进行评价研究。数据收集使用问卷/问卷技术和访谈。该样本包括来自爪哇岛中部一所大学的38名建筑工程教育项目学生(PTB)、PTB研究项目的工业实践协调员、9位导师和4名工业顾问。研究结果显示:(1)对工业实践项目实施环境的评估为最高,百分比为80.22%;(2)对行业实践计划实施输入的评估被归类为78.10%;(3)对工业实践项目实施过程的评估被认为是79.63%。(4)工业实践项目实施产品评估的比例为81.68%。摘要:在发展教育程序的过程中,评估是一个非常重要的补充。通过对工业实践项目的评估,它希望能够发现存在项目的力量和weaknesses of industrial practical program, it hoped that it will be able to find out strengths and weaknesses of existing program。这项研究旨在评估工业实践工程教育学生项目的实施,该项目来自背景、输入、过程、产品。这一研究采用了一种量化研究方法的方法。收集数据提问和面试。这项反应来自印尼中央爪哇一所大学的大楼工程教育学习项目。反应考虑到38个学生,工业活动协调器,9个主管,4个工业主管。这项研究中的数据分析使用的平均资产分析技术。研究结果显示:(1)对工业化实践项目的可行性评估为82.22%;(2)对工业实践项目实施的输入进行分类,以78.10%的效率;(3)对工业实践项目的评估与79.63%的进度是机密的。(4)对该项目的产品实施的评估是81.68%的机密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perbandingan Metode Federal Aviation Administration dan Software FAARFIELD dalam Menentukan Tebal Perkerasan Runway Pengaruh Fly Ash sebagai Pengganti Sebagian Semen terhadap Berat Isi dan Kuat Tekan Segmen Kolom Praktis Modular Ramah Lingkungan Perencanaan Kebutuhan Lubang Resapan Biopori (LRB) dalam Rangka Konservasi Air di Kampus A Universitas Negeri Jakarta Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Impact on Time and Cost of East Java'S National Road Projects Efforts to Overcome the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Through Lesson Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1