From individual symptoms to psychopathological fields. Towards a field perspective on clinical human suffering

G. Francesetti
{"title":"From individual symptoms to psychopathological fields. Towards a field perspective on clinical human suffering","authors":"G. Francesetti","doi":"10.53667/qqwt3472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Abstract: In this article I introduce the concept of psychopathological field to move from an individualistic psychopathology towards a radically relational one. I have sought to describe the concept by tracing its roots, which lie deep in Gestalt psychology, in Gestalt therapy and in phenomenology – in its classical and neo-phenomenological formulations and in its deriva- tions in psychopathology and psychiatry. From this perspective, the psychopathological field is the field of experience that is actualised in the therapeutic encounter, bringing into play at the contact-boundary the absence which it conveys. To grasp the actualisation of the field and its movements, the therapist must develop an aesthetic sensibility, which is what enables him to become attuned to the root of the experience, where the psychopathological field emerges as an atmospheric presence, a perceptive prius, before distinct subjects and objects emerge. In this way the therapist perceives how the intentionalities for contact at play in the field move and shift, so as to reveal the presence of an absence, which can then be transformed into presence itself and beauty. Taking the subject of psychopathology to be the field instead of the individual opens up a radically relational horizon, with significant implications for both clinical practice and therapy. This perspective on Gestalt therapy seeks to remain faithful to its epistemological roots while tuning in to the developments and needs of contemporary psychotherapy. Key words: psychopathological field, psychopathology, aesthetics, domains of contact, perception, Gestaltung, pain, beauty, almost-entities, new-phenomenology, trans- generational.\"","PeriodicalId":103162,"journal":{"name":"British Gestalt Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Gestalt Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53667/qqwt3472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

"Abstract: In this article I introduce the concept of psychopathological field to move from an individualistic psychopathology towards a radically relational one. I have sought to describe the concept by tracing its roots, which lie deep in Gestalt psychology, in Gestalt therapy and in phenomenology – in its classical and neo-phenomenological formulations and in its deriva- tions in psychopathology and psychiatry. From this perspective, the psychopathological field is the field of experience that is actualised in the therapeutic encounter, bringing into play at the contact-boundary the absence which it conveys. To grasp the actualisation of the field and its movements, the therapist must develop an aesthetic sensibility, which is what enables him to become attuned to the root of the experience, where the psychopathological field emerges as an atmospheric presence, a perceptive prius, before distinct subjects and objects emerge. In this way the therapist perceives how the intentionalities for contact at play in the field move and shift, so as to reveal the presence of an absence, which can then be transformed into presence itself and beauty. Taking the subject of psychopathology to be the field instead of the individual opens up a radically relational horizon, with significant implications for both clinical practice and therapy. This perspective on Gestalt therapy seeks to remain faithful to its epistemological roots while tuning in to the developments and needs of contemporary psychotherapy. Key words: psychopathological field, psychopathology, aesthetics, domains of contact, perception, Gestaltung, pain, beauty, almost-entities, new-phenomenology, trans- generational."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从个体症状到精神病理领域。对临床人类痛苦的实地观察
摘要:在本文中,我引入了精神病理场的概念,以从个人主义的精神病理学走向激进的关系精神病理学。我试图通过追溯它的根源来描述这个概念,它深深植根于格式塔心理学、格式塔治疗和现象学——在它的古典和新现象学公式中,在它在精神病理学和精神病学中的衍生中。从这个角度来看,精神病理学领域是在治疗遭遇中实现的经验领域,在接触边界上发挥它所传达的缺席。为了掌握场及其运动的实现,治疗师必须发展一种审美敏感性,这使他能够与经验的根源相协调,在那里,精神病理场在不同的主体和客体出现之前,作为一种大气的存在,一种感知的普锐斯出现。通过这种方式,治疗师感知接触的意向性如何在场域中移动和转移,从而揭示缺席的存在,然后将其转化为存在本身和美。将精神病理学的主题作为领域而不是个体,打开了一个根本的关系视野,对临床实践和治疗都具有重要意义。格式塔疗法的这种观点力求忠实于它的认识论根源,同时适应当代心理治疗的发展和需要。关键词:精神病理学领域,精神病理学,美学,接触领域,感知,完形,疼痛,美,几乎实体,新现象学,跨代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a relational/compassionate Gestalt understanding of trauma and addiction In and out the gender pail Gaslighting: how does a plant survive on fake watering? Artistic creativity as a resource in the work of the psychological support group of Kharkiv Institute of Gestalt and Psychodrama during wartime The Cure: working with separation and loss through song parody (lyric substitution)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1