Creativity Patterns in the Production of Scientific Theories and Literary Fiction

Coltan Scrivner, D. Maestripieri
{"title":"Creativity Patterns in the Production of Scientific Theories and Literary Fiction","authors":"Coltan Scrivner, D. Maestripieri","doi":"10.1086/696984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he process of knowledge formation and transmittal can be studied historically, at the level of societies and their cultures, or at the level of the individual and over the course of an individual’s life. Take scientific knowledge, for example. The production of scientific knowledge by an individual is often associated with the concept of “creativity.” According to social scientists, scientific knowledge production can qualify as creative if such knowledge is novel, is useful (e.g., it leads to theoretical advances in a discipline, or new technological applications), and has high impact. The concept of creativity, however, does not apply only to scientific inquiry, but also to human activities in many other domains such as, for the example, the arts. Whether similar or different types of creativity are involved in science and in the arts is a question that has generated a great deal of research. Two important aspects of creativity have been identified by research in psychology and cognitive science. First, creativity is usually the product of a gradual and complex process, rather than of a sudden leap of imagination. Second, there is a relationship between previous","PeriodicalId":187662,"journal":{"name":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/696984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

T he process of knowledge formation and transmittal can be studied historically, at the level of societies and their cultures, or at the level of the individual and over the course of an individual’s life. Take scientific knowledge, for example. The production of scientific knowledge by an individual is often associated with the concept of “creativity.” According to social scientists, scientific knowledge production can qualify as creative if such knowledge is novel, is useful (e.g., it leads to theoretical advances in a discipline, or new technological applications), and has high impact. The concept of creativity, however, does not apply only to scientific inquiry, but also to human activities in many other domains such as, for the example, the arts. Whether similar or different types of creativity are involved in science and in the arts is a question that has generated a great deal of research. Two important aspects of creativity have been identified by research in psychology and cognitive science. First, creativity is usually the product of a gradual and complex process, rather than of a sudden leap of imagination. Second, there is a relationship between previous
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学理论与文学小说生产中的创造模式
知识形成和传播的过程可以从历史的角度,在社会及其文化的层面上,或在个人的层面上,在个人的一生中进行研究。以科学知识为例。个人科学知识的产生通常与“创造力”的概念联系在一起。根据社会科学家的说法,如果科学知识是新颖的,有用的(例如,它导致了一个学科的理论进步,或新的技术应用),并且具有很高的影响力,那么科学知识的生产就可以被称为创造性。然而,创造力的概念不仅适用于科学探究,也适用于许多其他领域的人类活动,例如艺术。科学和艺术中是否涉及相似或不同类型的创造力,这是一个已经产生了大量研究的问题。心理学和认知科学的研究已经确定了创造力的两个重要方面。首先,创造力通常是一个渐进而复杂的过程的产物,而不是想象力的突然飞跃。第二,有前有后的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcreation and Postcolonial Knowledge Chomsky versus Foucault, and the Problem of Knowledge in Translation When Dragons Show Themselves: Research, Constructing Knowledge, and the Practice of Translation A Critique of Provincial Reason: Situated Cosmopolitanisms and the Infrastructures of Theoretical Translation Translation and the Archive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1