What does the past teach?

F. Cardoso, Ana Karolina Félix da Silva
{"title":"What does the past teach?","authors":"F. Cardoso, Ana Karolina Félix da Silva","doi":"10.25247/hu.2022.v9n18.p197-214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The narratives constructed by the Brazilian military dictatorship relied on different spaces and subjects as a way of establishing themselves. In this sense, the Brazilian hegemonic media was directly involved in the practice of military dictatorship. However, the narrative about the dictatorship is still in dispute as to the objectives that were mobilized within certain events, which still need to be problematized. Thus, this study aims to investigate the narrative mobilized by periodicals that circulated between 1964 and 1985 in the city of Arcoverde, in the countryside of Pernambuco, during the dictatorship, in order to understand how the repression relied on the symbolic power of the press for its maintenance. We turn to the critique of the epistemological characteristic of narrative about the past and time in order to consider narration as an examination of linear historical time. The results obtained indicate that the media discourse was organized in favor of the ideological control forged by the dictatorial narrative, whether through the explicit defense of the regime or by subtle agency. The reconstruction of the narrative in question can be considered, even today, a field in dispute, which interferes decisively in the construction of memory and has repercussions in the reproduction of a social imaginary that congregates empty visions about what the military dictatorship meant in Brazil and in Pernambuco. The research, in the end, highlights the need to narrate as a way of reflecting the past as an epistemic and political strategy to value a minority history.","PeriodicalId":117088,"journal":{"name":"HISTÓRIA UNICAP","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTÓRIA UNICAP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25247/hu.2022.v9n18.p197-214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The narratives constructed by the Brazilian military dictatorship relied on different spaces and subjects as a way of establishing themselves. In this sense, the Brazilian hegemonic media was directly involved in the practice of military dictatorship. However, the narrative about the dictatorship is still in dispute as to the objectives that were mobilized within certain events, which still need to be problematized. Thus, this study aims to investigate the narrative mobilized by periodicals that circulated between 1964 and 1985 in the city of Arcoverde, in the countryside of Pernambuco, during the dictatorship, in order to understand how the repression relied on the symbolic power of the press for its maintenance. We turn to the critique of the epistemological characteristic of narrative about the past and time in order to consider narration as an examination of linear historical time. The results obtained indicate that the media discourse was organized in favor of the ideological control forged by the dictatorial narrative, whether through the explicit defense of the regime or by subtle agency. The reconstruction of the narrative in question can be considered, even today, a field in dispute, which interferes decisively in the construction of memory and has repercussions in the reproduction of a social imaginary that congregates empty visions about what the military dictatorship meant in Brazil and in Pernambuco. The research, in the end, highlights the need to narrate as a way of reflecting the past as an epistemic and political strategy to value a minority history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去教给我们什么?
巴西军事独裁政权构建的叙事依赖于不同的空间和主题作为一种建立自己的方式。从这个意义上说,巴西的霸权媒体直接参与了军事独裁的实践。然而,关于独裁统治的叙述在某些事件中动员的目标仍然存在争议,这仍然需要加以质疑。因此,本研究旨在调查1964年至1985年间在伯南布哥农村的阿科弗德市传播的期刊所动员的叙事,以了解镇压是如何依靠新闻界的象征力量来维持的。我们转向对过去和时间叙事的认识论特征的批判,以便将叙事视为对线性历史时间的检验。所获得的结果表明,无论是通过对政权的明确辩护还是通过微妙的代理,媒体话语都是为了支持独裁叙事所锻造的意识形态控制而组织起来的。即使在今天,有问题的叙事的重建也可以被认为是一个有争议的领域,它决定性地干扰了记忆的构建,并对社会想象的再现产生了影响,这种社会想象聚集了关于巴西和伯南布哥军事独裁意味着什么的空洞愿景。最后,这项研究强调了将叙事作为一种反映过去的方式,作为一种重视少数民族历史的认知和政治策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structural bases of the Terrorist State in Latin America «Salvaguardar dentro de la Ley el interés general». La declaración del estado de excepción durante la dictadura franquista. O lugar do testemunho, do acontecimento e das memórias em Ilda Quintas Gomes Silencios dictatoriales y resistencias. “Doctrina de la seguridad nacional, dispositivos de inteligencia y prácticas represivas de los agentes de castigos en la Argentina del terrorismo de Estado, 1976 a 1983.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1