Between Scylla and Charybdis – Lawyers of the High Judge Conference in 1861

Imre Képessy
{"title":"Between Scylla and Charybdis – Lawyers of the High Judge Conference in 1861","authors":"Imre Képessy","doi":"10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/56-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the proclamation of the October Diploma in 1860, Emperor Franz Joseph partially restored the Hungarian constitutional order. As soon as the decision had been made that the Hungarian judiciary was to be revived, the newly formed courts of law in the counties began to operate on the Hungarian laws. The issues presented themselves fairly quickly, since the Austrian laws enacted in the 1850s made so fundamental changes to the legal system that it seemed impossible to reinstate the Hungarian laws without any changes. A conference was convened by the highest-ranking judge of the country in January 1861, and its members had to resolve this seemingly impossible situation. Between Scylla (keeping the unconstitutionally introduced Austrian legal norms) and Charybdis (reinstating the “old” Hungarian laws at the expense of legal certainty), they had to find a way to restore the Hungarian legal order in such way that it would not harm the rights of the citizens.","PeriodicalId":406988,"journal":{"name":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/56-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the proclamation of the October Diploma in 1860, Emperor Franz Joseph partially restored the Hungarian constitutional order. As soon as the decision had been made that the Hungarian judiciary was to be revived, the newly formed courts of law in the counties began to operate on the Hungarian laws. The issues presented themselves fairly quickly, since the Austrian laws enacted in the 1850s made so fundamental changes to the legal system that it seemed impossible to reinstate the Hungarian laws without any changes. A conference was convened by the highest-ranking judge of the country in January 1861, and its members had to resolve this seemingly impossible situation. Between Scylla (keeping the unconstitutionally introduced Austrian legal norms) and Charybdis (reinstating the “old” Hungarian laws at the expense of legal certainty), they had to find a way to restore the Hungarian legal order in such way that it would not harm the rights of the citizens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在Scylla和Charybdis之间——1861年高级法官会议的律师
随着1860年十月文凭的宣布,弗朗茨·约瑟夫皇帝部分恢复了匈牙利的宪法秩序。匈牙利的司法机构一经作出恢复的决定,各郡新成立的法院就开始按照匈牙利法律运作。这些问题很快就出现了,因为19世纪50年代颁布的奥地利法律对法律制度进行了如此根本的改变,似乎不可能不做任何改变就恢复匈牙利的法律。1861年1月,全国最高级别的法官召开了一次会议,会议成员必须解决这个看似不可能的局面。在Scylla(保留违反宪法引入的奥地利法律规范)和Charybdis(以牺牲法律确定性为代价恢复“旧”匈牙利法律)之间,他们必须找到一种不损害公民权利的方式恢复匈牙利法律秩序的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulation of Unfair Contract Terms in Central and Eastern European Countries The Absence of the Employee due to the Medical or Diagnostic Examination of His or Her Child Between Scylla and Charybdis – Lawyers of the High Judge Conference in 1861 Occupational Accident and Occupational Disease as an Obstacle to Work on the Employee’s Side – the Czech Perspective Polish-German Dispute over WWII Reparations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1