Occupational Accident and Occupational Disease as an Obstacle to Work on the Employee’s Side – the Czech Perspective

K. Štěpánková
{"title":"Occupational Accident and Occupational Disease as an Obstacle to Work on the Employee’s Side – the Czech Perspective","authors":"K. Štěpánková","doi":"10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/69-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper, the author deals with the issue of the current jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic regarding the employee’s right to wage compensation due to an obstacle to work on the employer’s side in the case the employer does not assign work to this employee according to the employment contract due to his or her common illness. She then assesses the relevance and applicability of these opinions in relation to occupational accidents and occupational diseases. At the same time, she bases her conclusions not only on the interpretation of the applicable Czech legislation, but also on a whole range of case law. In the conclusions, she also deals in detail with the employer’s obligation to transfer such an employee to another suitable job for him or her. The fact whether the employer has another suitable job available for the employee (and decides of his or her own free will not to transfer the employee to it) or, on the contrary, does not have another suitable job available for the employee is, in the opinion of the author, a key distinguishing criterion for considering whether the non-assignment of work by the employer should be assessed as an obstacle to work on the employer’s side (with the right to wage compensation) or as an obstacle to work on the employee’s side.","PeriodicalId":406988,"journal":{"name":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/69-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the paper, the author deals with the issue of the current jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic regarding the employee’s right to wage compensation due to an obstacle to work on the employer’s side in the case the employer does not assign work to this employee according to the employment contract due to his or her common illness. She then assesses the relevance and applicability of these opinions in relation to occupational accidents and occupational diseases. At the same time, she bases her conclusions not only on the interpretation of the applicable Czech legislation, but also on a whole range of case law. In the conclusions, she also deals in detail with the employer’s obligation to transfer such an employee to another suitable job for him or her. The fact whether the employer has another suitable job available for the employee (and decides of his or her own free will not to transfer the employee to it) or, on the contrary, does not have another suitable job available for the employee is, in the opinion of the author, a key distinguishing criterion for considering whether the non-assignment of work by the employer should be assessed as an obstacle to work on the employer’s side (with the right to wage compensation) or as an obstacle to work on the employee’s side.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从捷克的角度看,职业事故和职业病是员工工作的障碍
在本文中,作者讨论了捷克共和国最高法院目前关于雇员因雇主一方的工作障碍而获得工资补偿的权利的判例问题,即雇主因其常见病而未根据雇佣合同分配工作。然后,她评估了这些意见在职业事故和职业病方面的相关性和适用性。同时,她的结论不仅基于对适用的捷克立法的解释,而且也基于整个范围的判例法。在结论中,她还详细讨论了雇主将这样的雇员转移到另一个适合他或她的工作的义务。作者认为,雇主是否为雇员提供了另一份合适的工作(并根据自己的自由意志决定不将雇员转到另一份合适的工作),或者相反,是否为雇员提供了另一份合适的工作,考虑雇主不分配工作是应被评估为妨碍雇主一方工作(有权获得工资补偿)还是作为雇员一方工作的障碍,这是一个关键的区别标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulation of Unfair Contract Terms in Central and Eastern European Countries The Absence of the Employee due to the Medical or Diagnostic Examination of His or Her Child Between Scylla and Charybdis – Lawyers of the High Judge Conference in 1861 Occupational Accident and Occupational Disease as an Obstacle to Work on the Employee’s Side – the Czech Perspective Polish-German Dispute over WWII Reparations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1