FEVER Breaker’s Run of Team NbAuzDrLqg

Youngwoo Kim, J. Allan
{"title":"FEVER Breaker’s Run of Team NbAuzDrLqg","authors":"Youngwoo Kim, J. Allan","doi":"10.18653/v1/D19-6615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe our submission for the Breaker phase of the second Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Task. Our adversarial data can be explained by two perspectives. First, we aimed at testing model’s ability to retrieve evidence, when appropriate query terms could not be easily generated from the claim. Second, we test model’s ability to precisely understand the implications of the texts, which we expect to be rare in FEVER 1.0 dataset. Overall, we suggested six types of adversarial attacks. The evaluation on the submitted systems showed that the systems were only able get both the evidence and label correct in 20% of the data. We also demonstrate our adversarial run analysis in the data development process.","PeriodicalId":153447,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-6615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We describe our submission for the Breaker phase of the second Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Task. Our adversarial data can be explained by two perspectives. First, we aimed at testing model’s ability to retrieve evidence, when appropriate query terms could not be easily generated from the claim. Second, we test model’s ability to precisely understand the implications of the texts, which we expect to be rare in FEVER 1.0 dataset. Overall, we suggested six types of adversarial attacks. The evaluation on the submitted systems showed that the systems were only able get both the evidence and label correct in 20% of the data. We also demonstrate our adversarial run analysis in the data development process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
狂热破坏者队NbAuzDrLqg的运行
我们描述了我们对第二个事实提取和验证(FEVER)共享任务的断路器阶段的提交。我们的对抗性数据可以用两个角度来解释。首先,我们的目标是测试模型检索证据的能力,当不容易从索赔中生成适当的查询条件时。其次,我们测试了模型精确理解文本含义的能力,我们预计这在FEVER 1.0数据集中是罕见的。总的来说,我们提出了六种类型的对抗性攻击。对提交系统的评价表明,系统仅能在20%的数据中同时获得证据和标签的正确性。我们还演示了数据开发过程中的对抗性运行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Veritas Annotator: Discovering the Origin of a Rumour Neural Multi-Task Learning for Stance Prediction Hybrid Models for Aspects Extraction without Labelled Dataset Relation Extraction among Multiple Entities Using a Dual Pointer Network with a Multi-Head Attention Mechanism Team GPLSI. Approach for automated fact checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1