MCDM methods to address sustainability challenges, such as climate change, resource management, and social justice

F. Riandari, Marc Z. Albert, Stanley S. Rogoff
{"title":"MCDM methods to address sustainability challenges, such as climate change, resource management, and social justice","authors":"F. Riandari, Marc Z. Albert, Stanley S. Rogoff","doi":"10.35335/idea.v1i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The novelty of the proposed research lies in its focus on developing and refining MCDM methods to address the complex and multifaceted nature of sustainability challenges, and evaluating the effectiveness and practicality of these methods in real-world decision-making contexts. While previous research has explored the application of MCDM methods to sustainability decision-making, this study aims to advance the field by addressing the following novel aspects: Comprehensive evaluation of MCDM methods: The study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of various MCDM methods in addressing sustainability challenges, including climate change, resource management, and social justice. This evaluation will consider the strengths and limitations of each method, and identify opportunities for improvement. Incorporation of stakeholder values: The study will incorporate stakeholder values into the decision-making process, ensuring that the resulting decisions reflect the diverse perspectives and priorities of all stakeholders. This approach differs from traditional decision-making methods, which often prioritize the perspectives of a select few. Real-world decision-making contexts: The study will evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of MCDM methods in real-world decision-making contexts, providing insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with the implementation of these methods. This will help decision-makers to better understand how to apply MCDM methods to real-world sustainability challenges. The proposed research offers a novel and comprehensive approach to addressing sustainability challenges through the development and application of MCDM methods. By evaluating the effectiveness and practicality of these methods in real-world decision-making contexts, this study aims to provide decision-makers with a more comprehensive and informed approach to sustainability decision-making that reflects the diverse perspectives and priorities of all stakeholders. Future research in the area of MCDM methods to address sustainability challenges could focus on several areas, including: Cross-disciplinary collaborations: Given the complex and multifaceted nature of sustainability challenges, there is a need for cross-disciplinary collaborations between decision-makers, scientists, and stakeholders to develop and implement effective sustainability strategies. Future research could explore how MCDM methods can facilitate these collaborations and promote interdisciplinary dialogue and knowledge sharing. Evaluation of long-term sustainability outcomes: While MCDM methods can help decision-makers to evaluate alternatives based on multiple criteria and stakeholder values, it may be challenging to evaluate the long-term sustainability outcomes of these decisions. Future research could explore how MCDM methods can be used to evaluate the long-term sustainability outcomes of decisions, and how the effectiveness of these methods can be measured over time. Incorporation of ethical considerations: Sustainability decision-making involves ethical considerations related to distributive justice, procedural justice, and environmental ethics. Future research could explore how MCDM methods can incorporate these ethical considerations into the decision-making process to ensure that sustainability decisions are not only efficient and effective but also ethically justifiable. Evaluation of MCDM methods in different decision-making contexts: MCDM methods may be more suitable for certain decision-making contexts than others. Future research could evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of MCDM methods in different decision-making contexts, such as public sector decision-making, corporate decision-making, or community-based decision-making. Development of user-friendly decision support tools: While MCDM methods can be effective in addressing sustainability challenges, they may be challenging to implement in practice. Future research could focus on the development of user-friendly decision support tools that can help decision-makers to implement MCDM methods more easily and effectively. Overall, future research in the area of MCDM methods to address sustainability challenges should focus on advancing the understanding and application of these methods in real-world decision-making contexts. By addressing the challenges and limitations of these methods and developing new approaches to address emerging sustainability challenges, researchers can help decision-makers to make more informed and sustainable decisions for the benefit of society and the environment.","PeriodicalId":344431,"journal":{"name":"Idea: Future Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Idea: Future Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35335/idea.v1i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The novelty of the proposed research lies in its focus on developing and refining MCDM methods to address the complex and multifaceted nature of sustainability challenges, and evaluating the effectiveness and practicality of these methods in real-world decision-making contexts. While previous research has explored the application of MCDM methods to sustainability decision-making, this study aims to advance the field by addressing the following novel aspects: Comprehensive evaluation of MCDM methods: The study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of various MCDM methods in addressing sustainability challenges, including climate change, resource management, and social justice. This evaluation will consider the strengths and limitations of each method, and identify opportunities for improvement. Incorporation of stakeholder values: The study will incorporate stakeholder values into the decision-making process, ensuring that the resulting decisions reflect the diverse perspectives and priorities of all stakeholders. This approach differs from traditional decision-making methods, which often prioritize the perspectives of a select few. Real-world decision-making contexts: The study will evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of MCDM methods in real-world decision-making contexts, providing insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with the implementation of these methods. This will help decision-makers to better understand how to apply MCDM methods to real-world sustainability challenges. The proposed research offers a novel and comprehensive approach to addressing sustainability challenges through the development and application of MCDM methods. By evaluating the effectiveness and practicality of these methods in real-world decision-making contexts, this study aims to provide decision-makers with a more comprehensive and informed approach to sustainability decision-making that reflects the diverse perspectives and priorities of all stakeholders. Future research in the area of MCDM methods to address sustainability challenges could focus on several areas, including: Cross-disciplinary collaborations: Given the complex and multifaceted nature of sustainability challenges, there is a need for cross-disciplinary collaborations between decision-makers, scientists, and stakeholders to develop and implement effective sustainability strategies. Future research could explore how MCDM methods can facilitate these collaborations and promote interdisciplinary dialogue and knowledge sharing. Evaluation of long-term sustainability outcomes: While MCDM methods can help decision-makers to evaluate alternatives based on multiple criteria and stakeholder values, it may be challenging to evaluate the long-term sustainability outcomes of these decisions. Future research could explore how MCDM methods can be used to evaluate the long-term sustainability outcomes of decisions, and how the effectiveness of these methods can be measured over time. Incorporation of ethical considerations: Sustainability decision-making involves ethical considerations related to distributive justice, procedural justice, and environmental ethics. Future research could explore how MCDM methods can incorporate these ethical considerations into the decision-making process to ensure that sustainability decisions are not only efficient and effective but also ethically justifiable. Evaluation of MCDM methods in different decision-making contexts: MCDM methods may be more suitable for certain decision-making contexts than others. Future research could evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of MCDM methods in different decision-making contexts, such as public sector decision-making, corporate decision-making, or community-based decision-making. Development of user-friendly decision support tools: While MCDM methods can be effective in addressing sustainability challenges, they may be challenging to implement in practice. Future research could focus on the development of user-friendly decision support tools that can help decision-makers to implement MCDM methods more easily and effectively. Overall, future research in the area of MCDM methods to address sustainability challenges should focus on advancing the understanding and application of these methods in real-world decision-making contexts. By addressing the challenges and limitations of these methods and developing new approaches to address emerging sustainability challenges, researchers can help decision-makers to make more informed and sustainable decisions for the benefit of society and the environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MCDM方法解决可持续发展的挑战,如气候变化、资源管理和社会正义
该研究的新颖之处在于其重点在于发展和完善MCDM方法,以解决可持续性挑战的复杂性和多面性,并评估这些方法在现实世界决策环境中的有效性和实用性。MCDM方法的综合评价:本研究旨在综合评价各种MCDM方法在应对气候变化、资源管理和社会正义等可持续发展挑战中的有效性和实用性。这种评价将考虑每种方法的优点和局限性,并确定改进的机会。纳入利益相关者价值观:本研究将把利益相关者价值观纳入决策过程,确保最终决策反映所有利益相关者的不同观点和优先事项。这种方法不同于传统的决策方法,传统的决策方法往往优先考虑少数人的观点。现实世界的决策环境:该研究将评估MCDM方法在现实世界决策环境中的有效性和实用性,提供与这些方法实施相关的挑战和机遇的见解。这将有助于决策者更好地了解如何将MCDM方法应用于现实世界的可持续性挑战。本研究通过MCDM方法的发展和应用,为解决可持续性挑战提供了一种新颖而全面的方法。通过评估这些方法在现实世界决策环境中的有效性和实用性,本研究旨在为决策者提供一个更全面、更明智的可持续发展决策方法,以反映所有利益相关者的不同观点和优先事项。未来在MCDM方法领域应对可持续性挑战的研究可以集中在以下几个方面:跨学科合作:考虑到可持续性挑战的复杂性和多面性,决策者、科学家和利益相关者之间需要跨学科合作来制定和实施有效的可持续性战略。未来的研究可以探索MCDM方法如何促进这些合作,促进跨学科对话和知识共享。长期可持续性结果的评估:虽然MCDM方法可以帮助决策者基于多种标准和利益相关者价值来评估备选方案,但评估这些决策的长期可持续性结果可能具有挑战性。未来的研究可以探索如何使用MCDM方法来评估决策的长期可持续性结果,以及如何随时间测量这些方法的有效性。纳入伦理考虑:可持续性决策涉及与分配公正、程序公正和环境伦理相关的伦理考虑。未来的研究可以探索MCDM方法如何将这些伦理考虑纳入决策过程,以确保可持续性决策不仅高效有效,而且在伦理上是合理的。不同决策环境下MCDM方法的评价:MCDM方法可能比其他方法更适合某些决策环境。未来的研究可以评估MCDM方法在不同决策背景下的有效性和实用性,如公共部门决策、企业决策或社区决策。开发用户友好的决策支持工具:虽然MCDM方法可以有效地应对可持续发展的挑战,但在实践中实施起来可能具有挑战性。未来的研究应侧重于开发用户友好的决策支持工具,帮助决策者更容易、更有效地实施MCDM方法。总体而言,未来在MCDM方法领域应对可持续性挑战的研究应侧重于促进这些方法在现实决策环境中的理解和应用。通过解决这些方法的挑战和局限性,并开发新的方法来应对新出现的可持续性挑战,研究人员可以帮助决策者做出更明智和可持续的决策,以造福社会和环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data driven approach for stochastic DEA in machine learning and artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy, stability, and interpretability of the model MCDM methods to address sustainability challenges, such as climate change, resource management, and social justice Expert system approach to improve the accuracy of prediction and solution of various agricultural scenarios Efficient optimization algorithms for various machine learning tasks, including classification, regression, and clustering Integrating the neural network into the stochastic DEA model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1