Parametric Comparative Analysis between Virtual Synchronous Generator and Droop-based Inertia for Inverter-Based Microgrids

Daniel D. Campo-Ossa, Enrique A. Sanabria-Torres, Jesus D. Vasquez-Plaza, Juan F. Patarroyo-Montenegro, Andres F. Lopez-Chavarro, Fabio Andrade-Rengifo
{"title":"Parametric Comparative Analysis between Virtual Synchronous Generator and Droop-based Inertia for Inverter-Based Microgrids","authors":"Daniel D. Campo-Ossa, Enrique A. Sanabria-Torres, Jesus D. Vasquez-Plaza, Juan F. Patarroyo-Montenegro, Andres F. Lopez-Chavarro, Fabio Andrade-Rengifo","doi":"10.1109/IECON48115.2021.9589766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a parametric comparative analysis between the virtual synchronous generator (VSG) method and the droop control method to emulate inertia in the voltage-source inverter (VSI). Droop controllers are commonly used to regulate sharing power in microgrids and distribute power generation proportionally among VSI’s depending on their rated power. Additionally, VSG has been used to regulate the Rate-of-Change-of-Frequency (RoCoF) of the microgrid using virtual inertia. Although both methods can be used to regulate the frequency variation, the influence of each method on the closed-loop eigenvalues is not the same. In this work, the transient response of the frequency is analyzed for each method to determine their advantages and disadvantages regarding frequency regulation in microgrid applications. The results were verified by conducting experimental trials using VSI’s. These experiments demonstrated that VSG is more suitable for regulating RoCoF and frequency nadir than droop controllers since it provides inertial support and improves frequency response.","PeriodicalId":443337,"journal":{"name":"IECON 2021 – 47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IECON 2021 – 47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON48115.2021.9589766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a parametric comparative analysis between the virtual synchronous generator (VSG) method and the droop control method to emulate inertia in the voltage-source inverter (VSI). Droop controllers are commonly used to regulate sharing power in microgrids and distribute power generation proportionally among VSI’s depending on their rated power. Additionally, VSG has been used to regulate the Rate-of-Change-of-Frequency (RoCoF) of the microgrid using virtual inertia. Although both methods can be used to regulate the frequency variation, the influence of each method on the closed-loop eigenvalues is not the same. In this work, the transient response of the frequency is analyzed for each method to determine their advantages and disadvantages regarding frequency regulation in microgrid applications. The results were verified by conducting experimental trials using VSI’s. These experiments demonstrated that VSG is more suitable for regulating RoCoF and frequency nadir than droop controllers since it provides inertial support and improves frequency response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于逆变器的微电网虚拟同步发电机与下垂惯性的参数比较分析
本文对虚拟同步发电机(VSG)方法和下垂控制方法模拟电压源逆变器(VSI)惯性进行了参数比较分析。下垂控制器通常用于调节微电网中的共享功率,并根据其额定功率在VSI之间按比例分配发电量。此外,VSG还被用于利用虚拟惯性调节微电网的频率变化率(RoCoF)。虽然两种方法都可以用来调节频率变化,但每种方法对闭环特征值的影响是不一样的。在这项工作中,分析了每种方法的频率瞬态响应,以确定它们在微电网应用中频率调节的优缺点。利用VSI进行的实验验证了结果。实验结果表明,相对于下垂控制器,VSG提供了惯性支撑,改善了频率响应,更适合用于调节RoCoF和频率最低点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Improved Extended Phase Shift Modulation for DAB Converter with the Blocking Capacitor An Online Noninvasive Estimation Method of Electrolytic Capacitor for Boost Converters Control of Grid-tied Dual-PV LLC Converter using Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Interface System (ANFIS) Space Vector Modulation Scheme for Three-Phase Single-Stage SEPIC-Based Grid-Connected Differential Inverter Dynamic Phasor-Based Modeling and Analysis of Dual-Loop Controlled DC-DC Converters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1